Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

King v. State......

Knight v. Morrison...

Leonard v. Poole....
Lewis v. Long....
Loveless v. Fowler.

Lansford v. Dietrich..

Maloney v. Dewey....
Manning v. Pippen......

Marshall ▼. Widdicomb Furni.
ture Co.........
McClellan v. Solomon....

McDade v. State.....

McKay v. Williams..

McNulty, Ex parte..
Medis v. State....
Moritz v. Lavelle.

Murray v. McNealy..

National Park Bank of N. Y. v.
Seaboard Bank..

National Ulster Co. Bank v.
Madden.....

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

79 Ga. 234....... 410

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Norris v. Savannah eta. R'y Co....Carrier of freight.. 23 Fla. 182...... 355

Orthwein v. Thomas

Bastards.........................127 Ill. 554. ...... 159

Palatka etc. R. R. Co. v. State...Obstruct'g highway. 23 Fla. 546....... 395

Patterson v. Hayden..........

Peek v. Peek...

Pennsylvania Schuylkill Valley
R. R. Co. v. Cleary...

People v. Aikin....

People v. Bentley..

......

.....

People v. Parker...

Perkins v. Stimmel..

[blocks in formation]

...Robbery...
Forgery...
Guardian and

[ocr errors]

sureties.

.....

77 Cal. 7......... 225 67 Mich. 222............. 578

[blocks in formation]

Perry v. City of Big Rapids..............Taxation........ 67 Mich. 146..... 570 Peterson v. Chicago etc. R'y Co... Master and servant. 67 Mich. 102..... 564 Philadelphia etc. R. R. Co. v. Beck. Carriers.....

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Sawyer v. Bray..............

.Executions................102 N. C. 79...... 713

Schmittler v. Simon..............Parol testimony....114 N. Y. 176........... 621 Seitherv. Philadelphia Traction Co. Trespass....... .125 Pa. St. 397.... 905

Seymour v. Smith.....

[blocks in formation]

Stevenson v. Fox.....

Stilly v. State........

...

.Appeal bond..........114 N. Y. 481..... 683 School dist't-order. 77 Cal. 638....... 327 ....Deed or will...... 86 Ala. 110...... 28 ..Carrying pistol.... 27 Tex. App. 443. 200 .Sale..... 66 Mich. 568..... 531 .......Master and servant. 67 Mich. 523..... 593 ...Evidence..... ....114 N. Y. 190..... 627

...

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

{Judgment corpus.} 77 Cal. 156....... 251

Wills......

.125 Pa. St. 568.... 922

Carrying pistol.... 27 Tex. App. 445. 201

Stock Exchange v. Board of Trade. Market quotations..127 Ill. 153.

Sullivan v. Lear....

Tapia v. Demartini.

Temple v. Baker..

Terry v. Rodahan.

[ocr errors]

107

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

Deeds......

...

79 Ga. 382....... 439

Insurance..... ..125 Pa. St. 427.... 909

........

..............Landl'd and tenant. 114 N. Y. 312..... 655 Township of Plymouth v. Graver..Highways... ........125 Pa. St. 24..... 867 Ulbright v. Eufaula Water Co........ Watercourses...... 86 Ala. 587...... 72

Village of Jefferson v. Chapman.. Munic. corporat'ns. 127 Ill. 438....... 136

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

AMERICAN STATE REPORTS.

VOL XL

CASES

IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF

ALABAMA.

SMITH V. STATE.

[86 ALABAMA, 57.]

CRIMINAL LAW — ADULTERY. -Conviction for adultery is proper upon proof

showing adulterous intercourse between the parties not less than four different times within the period of a month, with a confession by defendant that he had indulged in such illicit intercourse whenever ne desired; and the jury may determine whether there existed in the minds of the parties a purpose to continue the adulterous intercourse, so as to constitute "living together in adultery," within the meaning of section 4012, Criminal Code of Alabama.

CONVICTION FOR ADULTERY. -The instructions asked and refused were as follows: "1. The jury are not authorized to infer that the parties lived together in a state of adultery or fornication from the mere fact that they had sexual intercourse as many as four times within the same month; nor are they authorized to infer, from these facts alone, an intention on their part to continue these acts; there must be evidence to show a living together in adultery. 2. The fact that defendant and said female lived in the same house for about a month, and had sexual intercourse four times, two of which were in the house and the other two at other places, is not, of itself, sufficient to show the state or condition existing between the parties, but there must be other evidence to show the state or condition denounced by the statute."

J. D. Gardner, for the appellant.

Thomas N. McClellan, attorney-general, for the state.

SOMERVILLE, J. The evidence in this case, introduced on the trial, unquestionably authorized the jury to infer that the defendant lived in a state of adultery with the female named in the indictment. The facts show adulterous intercourse not less than four different times, extending through a period of

AX. ST. REP.. VOL. XL-2

17

« AnteriorContinuar »