| United States. Supreme Court - 1816 - 786 páginas
...case as that of Mills v. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held was, that the judgment of a state court should have...credit, validity, and effect, in every other court in the United States, which it had in the state where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1818 - 712 páginas
...case as that of Mills v. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held was that the judgment of a state court should have...other court of the United States, which it had in the state where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would be good to a suit thereon in such state,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1818 - 712 páginas
...case as that of Mills v. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish th« two cases. The doctrine there held was that the judgment of a state court should have...other court of the United States, which it had in the state where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would be good to a suit thereon in such state,... | |
| Maryland. Court of Appeals, Richard W. Gill, John Johnson, Richard Wordsworth Gill - 1838 - 572 páginas
...case as that of Miles vs. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held, was, that the judgment of a State court should have...credit, validity, and effect, in every other court in the United States, which it had, in the State where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would... | |
| Alabama. Supreme Court, George Noble Stewart - 1832 - 558 páginas
...«3Wh«a. 5J4 to recognise the former doctrine, said that it was held in the case of Mills v. Duryee "that the judgment of a State Court should have the same credit, validity and efft'ct, in every other Court in the United States, which it hnd in the State where it was pronounced... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1854 - 650 páginas
...case as that of Mills vs. Duryee. The Court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held, was that the judgment of a State Court should have the same faith, validity and effect, in every other Court in the United States, which it had in the State where... | |
| United States. Court of Claims - 1856 - 858 páginas
...case as that of Mills vs. Duryee. The court cannot distinguish the two cases. The doctrine there held was, that the judgment of a State court should have...credit, validity, and effect in every other court in the United States which iff had in the same where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would... | |
| 1856 - 764 páginas
...Hampton v. Me Council, 3 Wheat 234, rot viii. — NO. rr. — NEW SKIUKS. 28 Chief Justice MARSHALL says, "that the judgment of a State court should have the...same credit, validity and effect in every other court in the United States which it had in the State where it was pronounced, and that whatever pleas would... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1908 - 708 páginas
...admitted by appellant, and he also admits that the judgment or decree of a sister State is entitled to the same credit, validity and effect in every other court of the United States as it enjoys in the State where pronounced, if the court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 726 páginas
...subject-matter." In the case of Hampton v. McConnel,^ this court reiterated the doctrine of Mills v. Duri/ee, that "the judgment of a State court should have the...other court of the United States which it had in the State courts where it was pronounced; and that whatever pleas would be good to a suit therein in such... | |
| |