...even the slightest redeeming social importance — unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion — have...obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance. Pp. 484-485. •Together with No. 61, Alberts v. California, appeal from the Superior Court of California,...

...even the slightest redeeming social importance — unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion — have...obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance. Difficulties of enforcement locality may not be deemed so in another, under the test laid down by the...

...even the slightest redeeming social importance — unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion — have...they encroach upon the limited area of more important interests.14 But implicit in the history of the First Amendment is the rejection of obscenity as utterly...

...even the slightest redeeming social importance — unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion — have...they encroach upon the limited area of more important interests.14 But implicit in the history of the First Amendment is the rejection of obscenity as utterly...

...constitutiinallty of statutes to repress obscene and salacious books and plays, Justice Brennan added : "But implicit in the history of the first amendment is the rejection of obsceity as utterly without social importance." If all the cases henceforth would be as clear-cut as...

...even the slightest redeeming social importance — unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion — have...obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance. Difficulties of enforcement sality may not be deemed so in another, under the test laid down rthe Supreme...

...against obscene publications." Roth v. Vnited States, 354, US 476; 1 L. Ed. 2d 1498; 77 S. Ct. 1304: "But implicit in the history of the first amendment...obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance. * * » We hold that obscenity is not within the area of constitutltionally protected speech or press."...

...even the slightest redeeming social importance — unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion — have the full protection of the guaranties * * *" (Roth v. US, 354 US 476, 484 (1957)). Nor can the Commission take refuge in the fact that these...

...even the slightest redeeming social importance - unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion - have the full protection of the guarantees, unless excludable because they encroach upon the limited area of more important interests....

...even the slightest redeeming social importance — unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion — have the full protection of the guarantees, unless excludable because they encroach upon the limited area of more important interests....