Yale University Press, 1984 - 351 páginas
Among Plato's later dialogues, the Parmenides is one of the most significant. Not only a document of profound philosophical importance in its own right, it also contributes to the understanding of Platonic dialogues that followed it, and it exhibits the foundations of the physics and ontology that Aristotle offered in his Physics and Metaphysics VII.
In this book, R.E. Allen provides a superb translation of the Parmenides along with a structural analysis that procedes on the assumption that formal elements, logical and dramatic, are important to its interpretation and that the argument of the Parmenides is aporetic, a statement of metaphysical perplexities. Allen's original translation of and commentary on the Parmenides were published in 1983 to great acclaim and have now been revised by the author.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
absurd aporetic appears argu argument Aristotle Aristotle's assumes assumption becoming older claim Clazomenae conclusion consequences contained contradiction Cornford criticisms denial deny derived dialectical dialogue Dilemma of Participation distinction distinguished doctrine Eleatic equal exist extensive magnitude extent of Ideas fact follows further G. E. L. Owen given Greek Greek mathematics hypothesis Idea of Unity Ideas are thoughts incommensurability indivisible lines inference infinitely divisible infinity insofar large things Largeness and Smallness Largeness Regress logical mathematics mean Meta Metaphysics motion nature ness Not-being objects opposite Paradox of Divisibility Parmenides Phaedo Philebus philosophy Phys Plato Plotinus predicate premise Proclus proof proposition proved that Unity qualified ratio reason relation relative Republic respect rest result second disjunct sense sensible world separate Simmias smaller Socrates Sophist substance suggests suppose Theaetetus theory of Ideas Timaeus tion true unlike unlimited in multitude virtue whole Zeno Zeno's paradox