(3) Guarantees in which any condition, qualification, or contingency applied by the guarantor thereto is not fully and nondeceptively stated therein, or is stated in such manner or form as to be deceptively minimized, obscured, or concealed, wholly or in part; or

(4) Guarantees which are stated, phrased, or set forth in such manner that although the statements contained therein are literally and technically true, the whole is misleading in that purchasers of users are not made sufficiently aware of certain contingencies or conditions applicable to such guarantees which materially lessen the value or protection thereof as guarantees to purchasers or users; or

(5) Guarantees which purportedly extend for such an indefinite or unlimited period of time or for such long period of years as to have the capacity and tendency or effect of thereby misleading or deceiving purchasers or users into the belief that the product has or is definitely known to have a longer period of serviceability or greater durability in actual use than is in fact true; or

(6) Guarantees which in themselves or in the manner of their use are otherwise false, misleading, or deceptive.

(c) The section shall be applicable not only to guarantees but also to warran

ties, to purported warranties and guarantees, and to any promise or representation in the nature of or purporting to be a guarantee or warranty. § 30.9 Use of lottery schemes, etc.

It is an unfair trade practice to sell, distribute, or promote the sale or distribution of any industry product by means of a game of chance, gift, enterprise, or lottery scheme.

§ 30.10 Prohibited forms of trade restraints (unlawful price fixing, etc.).1

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, either directly or indirectly, to engage in any planned common course of action, or to enter into or take part in any understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy, with one or more members of the industry, or with any other person or persons, to fix or maintain the price of any goods or otherwise unlawfully to restrain trade; or to use any form of threat, intimidation, or coercion to induce any member of the industry or other person or persons to engage in any such planned common course of action, or to become a party to any such understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy. § 30.11 Prohibited sales below cost.

(a) The practice of selling products of the industry at a price less than the cost thereof to the seller, with the purpose or intent, and where the effect is, or where

same

1 The inhibitions of this section are subject to Public Law 542, approved July 14, 1952-66 Stat. 632 (the McGuire Act) which provides that with respect to a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trade-mark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open comthe petition with commodities of general class produced or distributed by others, a seller of such a commodity may enter into a contract or agreement with a buyer thereof which establishes a minimum or stipulated price at which such commodity may be resold by such buyer when such contract or agreement is lawful as applied to Intrastate transactions under the laws of the State, Territory, or territorial jurisdiction in which the resale is to be made or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale, and when such contract or agreement is not between manufacturers, or between wholesalers, or between brokers, or between factors, or between retailers, or between persons, firms, or corporations in competition with each other.

there is a reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifle competition or tend to create a monopoly, is an unfair trade practice.

(b) This section is not to be construed as prohibiting all sales below cost, but only such selling below the seller's cost as is resorted to and pursued with the wrongful intent or purpose referred to and where the effect is, or where there is reasonable probability that the effect will be, to substantially injure, suppress, or stifle competition or to create a monopoly. Among the situations in which the requisite purpose or intent would ordinarily be lacking are cases in which such sales were: (1) of seasonal goods near the conclusion of the season; (2) of obsolescent goods; (3) made under judicial process; or (4) made in bona fide discontinuance of business in the goods concerned.

(c) As used in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the term "cost" means the respective seller's cost and not an average cost in the industry whether such average cost be determined by an industry cost survey or some other method. It consists of the total outlay or expenditure by the seller in the acquisition, production, and distribution of the products involved, and comprises all elements of cost such as labor, material, depreciation, taxes (except taxes on net income and such other taxes as are not properly applicable to cost), and general overhead expenses, incurred by the seller in the acquisition, manufacture, processing, preparation for marketing, sale, and delivery of the products. Not to be included are dividends or interest on borrowed or invested capital, or nonoperated losses, such as fire losses and losses from the sale or exchange of capital assets. Operating cost should not be reduced by items of nonoperating income, such as income from investments, and gain on the sale of capital assets.

(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed as relieving an industry member from compliance with any of the requirements of the Robinson-Patman Act.

which effect unlawful price discrimination. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to grant or allow, secretly or openly, directly or indirectly, any rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, where such rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, effects a discrimination in price between different purchasers of goods of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved therein are in commerce, and where the effect thereof may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of either of them: Provided, however:

(1) That the goods involved in any such transaction are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, or charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use;

(2) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold or delivered;

NOTE: Cost justification under the above proviso depends upon net savings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transactions under the terms of subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a specified quantity by a single order for a single delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not follow that the same discount can be cost justified if granted to a purchaser of the

between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation. or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States."

same quantity by multiple orders or for multiple deliveries.

(3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade;

(4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned;

(5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good faith of an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor (see paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section.

(NOTE: In complaint proceedings, justification of price differentials under subparagraphs (2), (4), and (5) of this paragraph is a matter of affirmative defense to be established by the person or concern charged with price discrimination.)

(b) The following are examples of price differential practices to be considered as subject to the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when involving goods of like grade and quality which are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and which are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, or charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, and when:

(1) The commerce requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section are present; and

(2) The price differential has a reasonable probability of substantially lessening competition or tending to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or of injuring, destroying, or preventing competition with the industry member or with the customer receiving the benefit of the price differential, or with customers of either of them; and

(3) The price differential is not justified by cost savings (see paragraph (a) (2) of this section); and

(4) The price differential is not made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the market

(see

ability of the goods concerned paragraph (a) (4) of this section; and (5) The lower price was not made to meet in good faith an equally low price of a competitor (see paragraph (a) (5) of this section).

Example No. 1. At the end of a given period an industry member grants a discount to a customer equivalent to a fixed percentage of the total of the customer's purchases during such period and fails to grant such discount to other customers under like conditions.

Example No. 2. An industry member sells goods to one or more of his customers at a higher price than he charges other customers for like merchandise. It is immaterial whether or not such discrimination is accomplished by misrepresentation as to the grade and quality of the products sold.

(c) Prohibited brokerage and commissions. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other intermediary therein where such intermediary is acting in fact for or in behalf or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid.

(d) Prohibited advertising or promotional allowances, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of advertising or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connection with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufactured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or consideration is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers competing in the distribution of such products or commodities.

(e) Prohibited discriminatory services or facilities. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to discriminate in

favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity to purchaser upon terms not according to all competing purchasers on proportionally equal terms.

(f) Inducing or receiving an illegal discrimination in price. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by the foregoing provisions of this section.

NOTE: This paragraph is a restatement of section 2(f) of the Clayton Act as amended. In a complaint proceeding under this section, in order to make out a prima facie violation, the Commission must show that the favored buyer induced or received the lower price knowing, or knowing facts from which he should have known, that such price was violative of section 2(a) of said act and not justified under subparagraphs (2), (4), or (5) of paragraph (a) of this section. When, in any such proceeding, the issue is limited to the question of whether the price differential involved made only due allowance for differences in cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered, the Commission may establish a prima facie case in a number of ways, including:

(1) By showing that the buyer paying the lower price knew that the methods by, and quantities in, which the goods were sold and delivered to him by the seller were the same as in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices; or

(2) By showing, when there is a difference in the methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered by the seller to the buyer than in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices, that the buyer paying the lower price or prices knew the nature and extent of such differences and knew or should have known that they could not have resulted in sufficient cost savings of the kind and character specified as to justify the price differential.

products and to handle such member's products exclusively, and where the effect of such act or practice may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of

commerce.

§ 30.14 Defamation of competitors or false disparagement of their products.

The defamation of competitors by falsely imputing to them dishonorable conduct, inability to perform contracts, questionable credit standing, or by other false representations, or the false disparagement of competitors' products in any respect, or of their business methods, selling prices, values, credit terms, policies, or services, is an unfair trade practice.

§ 30.15 Procurement of competitors' confidential information by unfair means and wrongful use thereof.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to obtain information concerning the business of a competitor by bribery of an employee or agent of such competitor, by false or misleading statements or representations, by the impersonation of one in authority. or by any other unfair means, and to use the information so obtained in such manner as to injure said competitor in his business or to suppress competition or unreasonably restrain trade.

§ 30.16 Enticing away employees of competitors.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry willfully to entice away employees or sales representatives of competitors with the intent and effect of thereby unduly hampering or injuring competitors in their business and destroying or substantially lessening competition: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting employees from seeking more favorable employment, or as prohibiting employers from hiring or offering employment to employees of competitors in good faith and not for the purpose of injuring, destroying, or preventing competition.

§ 30.17 Commercial bribery.

It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry, directly or indirectly, to give, or offer to give, or permit or cause to be given, money or anything of value to agents, employees, or representatives of customers or prospective

customers, or to agents, employees, or representatives of competitors' customers or prospective customers, without the knowledge of their employers or principals, as an inducement to influence their employers or principals to purchase or contract to purchase products manufactured or sold by such industry member or the maker of such gift or offer, or to influence such employers or principals to refrain from dealing in the products of competitors or from dealing or contracting to deal with competitors.

§ 30.18 Unlawful interference with competitors' purchases or sales.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, by means of any monopolistic practices or through combination, conspiracy, coercion, boycott, threats, or any other unlawful means, directly or indirectly, to interfere with a competitor's right to purchase his raw materials and supplies from whomsoever he chooses, or to sell his product to whomsoever he chooses.

§ 30.19 Exclusive deals.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to contract to sell or sell any industry product, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condition, agreement, or understanding that the purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the products of a competitor or competitors of such industry member, where the effect of such sale or contract for sale, or of such condition, agreement, or understanding, may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. § 30.20 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices.

It is an unfair trade practice for any person, firm, or corporation to aid, abet, coerce, or induce another, directly or indirectly, to use or promote the use of any unfair trade practice specified in the rules in this part.

§ 31.1 Inducing breach of contract.

Maliciously inducing or attempting to induce the breach of existing contracts between competitors and their customers by any false or deceptive means whatsoever, or interfering with or obstructing the performance of any such contractual duties or services by any such means, with the purpose and effect of unduly hampering, injuring, or embarrassing competitors in their businesses, is an unfair trade practice.

§ 31.2 False marking or branding.

The false marking or branding of products of the industry with the effect of misleading or deceiving purchasers with respect to the quantity, quality, size, grade, or substance of the materials purchased, is an unfair trade practice. § 31.3 Deceptive selling methods.

The sale or offering for sale of any product of the industry by any false means or device which has the tendency and capacity to mislead or deceive customers or prospective customers as to the quantity, quality, substance, or size of such product, is an unfair trade practice. § 31.6 Defamation of competitors.

The defamation of competitors by falsely imputing to them dishonorable conduct, inability to perform contracts, questionable credit standing, or by other false representations, or the false disparagement of the grade or quality of their goods, with the tendency and capacity to mislead or deceive purchasers or prospective purchasers, is an unfair trade practice.