"Together both, ere the high lawn appear'd We drove a-field; and both together heard Battening our flocks with the fresh dews of night, Towards Heaven's descent had sloped his westering wheel. Temper'd to the oaten flute : Rough satyrs danced, and fauns with cloven heel But oh! the heavy change, now thou art gone, The willows and the hazel copses green Shall now no more be seen Fanning their joyous leaves to thy soft lays. As killing as the canker to the rose, Or taint-worn to the weanling herds that graze, Or frost to flowers that their gay wardrobe wear When first the white-thorn blows; Such, Lycidas, thy loss to shepherd's ear!" After the fine apostrophe on Fame which Phœbus is invoked to utter, the poet proceeds:- "Oh fountain Arethuse, and thou honour'd flood, But now my oat proceeds, And listens to the herald of the sea That came in Neptune's plea. He ask'd the waves, and ask'd the felon winds, What hard mishap hath doom'd this gentle swain? And question'd every gust of rugged winds That blows from off each beaked promontory. They knew not of his story: And sage Hippotades their answer brings, That not a blast was from his dungeon stray'd, The air was calm, and on the level brine Sleek Panope with all her sisters play'd." If this is art, it is perfect art; nor do we wish for anything better. The measure of the verse, the very sound of the names, would almost produce the effect here described. To ask the poet not to make use of such allusions as these is to ask the painter not to dip in the colours of the rainbow, if he could.In fact, it is the common cant of criticism to consider every allusion to the classics, and particularly in a mind like Milton's, as pedantry and affectation. Habit is a second nature; and, in this sense, the pedantry (if it is to be so called) of the scholastic enthusiast, who is constantly referring to images of which his mind is full, is as graceful as it is natural. It is not affectation in him to recur to ideas and modes of expression with which he has the strongest associations, and in which he takes the greatest delight. Milton was as conversant with the world of genius before him as with the world of nature about him; the fables of the ancient mythology were as familiar to him as his dreams. To be a pedant is to see neither the beauties of nature nor of art. Milton saw both; and he made use of the one only to adorn and give new interest to the other. He was a passionate admirer of nature; and, in a single couplet of his, describing the moon, "Like one that had been led astray Through the heaven's wide pathless way," there is more intense observation, and intense feeling of nature (as if he had gazed himself blind in looking at her,) than in twenty volumes of descriptive poetry. But he added in his own observation of nature the splendid fictions of ancient genius, enshrined her in the mysteries of ancient religion, and celebrated her with the pomp of ancient names. "Next Camus, reverend sire, went footing slow, The pilot of the Galilean lake." There is a wonderful correspondence in the rhythm of these lines to the ideas which they convey. This passage, which alludes to the clerical character of Lycidas, has been found fault with, as combining the truths of the Christian religion with the fiction of the Heathen mythology. I conceive there is very little foundation for this objection, either in reason or good taste. I will not go so far as to defend Camoens, who, in his Lusiad, makes Jupiter send Mercury with a dream to propagate the Catholic religion; nor do I know that it is generally proper to introduce the two things in the same poem, though I see no objection to it here; but of this I am quite sure, that there is no inconsistency or natural repugnance between this poetical and religious faith in the same mind. To the understanding, the belief of the one is incompatible with that of the other; but, in the imagination, they not only may, but do constantly, co-exist. I will venture to go farther, and maintain that every classical scholar, however orthodox a Christian he may be, is an honest Heathen at heart. This requires explanation.-Whoever, then, attaches a reality to any idea beyond the mere name, has, to a certain extent (though not an abstract,) an habitual and practical belief in it. Now, to any one familiar with the names of the personages of the Heathen mythology, they convey a positive identity beyond the mere name. We refer them to something out of ourselves. It is only by an effort of abstraction that we divest ourselves of the idea of their reality; all our involuntary prejudices are on their side. This is enough for the poet. They impose on the imagination by all the attractions of beauty and grandeur. They come down to us in sculpture and in song. We have the same associations with them as if they had really been for the belief of the fiction in ancient times has produced all the same effect as the reality could have done. It was a reality to the minds of the ancient Greeks and Romans, and through them it is reflected to us. And, as we shape towers, and men, and armed steeds, out of the broken clouds that glitter in the distant horizon, so, throned above the ruins of the ancient world, Jupiter still nods sublime on the top of blue Olympus, Hercules leans upon his club, Apollo has not laid aside his bow, nor Neptune his trident; the sea-gods ride upon the sounding waves, the long procession of heroes and demi-gods passes in endless review before us, and still we hear "The muses in a ring Aye round about Jove's altar sing: Have sight of Proteus coming from the sea, And hear old Triton blow his wreathed horn." If all these mighty fictions had really existed, they could have done no more for us!-I shall only give one other passage from Lycidas; but I flatter myself that it will be a treat to my readers, if they are not already familiar with it. It is the passage which contains that exquisite description of the flowers: "Return, Alpheus; the dread voice is past That shrunk thy streams; return, Sicilian Muse, The white pink, and the pansy freaked with jet, The musk-rose, and the well-attired woodbine, And daffadillies fill their cups with tears, Let our frail thoughts dally with false surmise. Dr. Johnson is very much offended at the introduction of these Dolphins; and indeed, if he had had to guide them through the waves, he would have made much the same figure as his old friend Dr. Burney does, swimming in the Thames with his wig on, with the water-nymphs, in the picture of Barry, at the Adelphi. There is a description of flowers in the Winter's Tale, which I shall give as a parallel to Milton's. I shall leave my readers to decide which is the finest; for I dare not give the preference. Perdita says, "Here's flowers for you, Hot lavender, mints, savoury, marjoram, To men of middle age. Y' are welcome. "Camillo. I should leave grazing, were I of your flock, And only live by gazing. "Perdita. Out, alas! You'd be so lean that blasts of January Would blow you through and through. Now, my fairest friends, I would I had some flowers o' th' spring, that might Become your time of day. O Proserpina, For the flowers now that, frighted, you let fall That come before the swallow dares, and take Dr. Johnson's general remark, that Milton's genius had not room to shew itself in his smaller pieces, is not well-founded. Not to mention Lycidas, the Allegro, and Penseroso, it proceeds on a false estimate of the merits of his great work, which is not more distinguished by strength and sublimity than by tender |