Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

BEFORE EXAMINING MAGISTRATES.

Statement of cases finally disposed of before examining magistrates.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

COURT PROCEEDINGS.

During Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1900.

CASE NO. 31.

PEOPLE VS. AUGUST VOSS.

Charge: Serving oleomargarine in hotel without displaying sign.

In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899: Case pending. 1899:

September 22,

Statute under which complaint was made repealed by act of legislature. Case nolle prossed.

CASE NO. 32.

PEOPLE VS. FRANK C. BOSS.

September 22,

Charge: Serving oleomargarine in restaurant without displaying sign. In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899: Case pending. 1899: Statute under which complaint was made repealed by act of legislature. Case nolle prossed.

CASE NO. 35.

PEOPLE VS. WILLIAM P. MURRAY, JR.

Charge: Serving oleomargarine in restaurant without displaying sign.

In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899: Case pending. September 22, 1899: Statute under which complaint was made repealed by act of legislature. Case nolle prossed.

CASE NO. 86.

PEOPLE VS. CLARENCE CHRYSLER.

Case pending.

September 18,

Charge: Selling artificially colored oleomargarine. In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899: 1899: Case nolle prossed, Supreme Court having decided that the section of the statute under which complaint was made is unconstitutional.

CASE NO. 87.

PEOPLE VS. JAMES DOWNIE.

Charge: Selling artificially colored oleomargarine.
In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899:

Case pending. September 18,

1899: Case nolle prossed, Supreme Court having decided that the section of the statute under which complaint was made is unconstitutional.

CASE NO. 88.

PEOPLE VS. FREDERICK ADDISON.

Case pending. September 18,

Charge: Selling artificially colored oleomargarine. In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899: 1899: Case nolle prossed, Supreme Court having decided that the section of the statute under which complaint was made is unconstitutional.

CASE NO. 89.

PEOPLE VS. THOMAS HORIGAN.

Charge: Selling artificially colored oleomargarine.

In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899:. Case pending. September 18, 1899: Case nolle prossed, Supreme Court having decided that the section of the statute under which complaint was made is unconstitutional.

CASE NO. 90.

PEOPLE VS. CHARLES ADDISON.

Case pending. September 18,

Charge: Selling artificially colored oleomargarine. In Recorder's Court, City of Detroit, July 1, 1899: 1899: Case nolle prossed, Supreme Court having decided that the section of the statute under which complaint was made is unconstitutional.

CASE NO. 110.

PEOPLE VS. CASPER RINSEY.

Case pending. September 18,

Charge: Selling artificially colored oleomargarine. In Justice Court, City of Ann Arbor, July 1, 1899: 1899: Case nolle prossed, Supreme Court having decided that the section of the statute under which complaint was made is unconstitutional.

CASE NO. 111.

PEOPLE VS. FRANK A. LINCOLN.

Charge: Selling artificially colored oleomargarine.

In Circuit Court, County of Jackson, July 1, 1899: Case pending. September 18, 1899: Case nolle prossed, Supreme Court having decided that the section of the statute under which complaint was made is unconstitutional.

CASE NO. 118. •

PEOPLE VS. JOHN ROBSON.

Charge: Selling adulterated cream of tartar.
In Circuit Court, County of Ingham, July 1, 1899:

Case pending. October 9, 1899: Defendant arraigned. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury. Defendant convicted. Sentence stayed, pending an appeal to the Supreme Court.

CASE NO. 120.

PEOPLE VS. SAM C. MILLER.

(Merriam, Collins & Co.)

Charge: Selling adulterated cream of tartar.

In Circuit Court. County of Berrien. July 1, 1899: Case pending. August 1, 1899: Defendant arraigned. Plea, guilty. Fined $30.00 and costs.

CASE NO. 121.

PEOPLE VS. JACOB HEETHUIS.

Charge: Selling adulterated mustard.

In Circuit Court, County of Muskegon. July 1, 1899: 18, 1889: Defendant arraigned. Plea, guilty. Fined $25.00.

Case pending. September

CASE NO. 122.

PEOPLE VS. HANS HANSEN.

Charge: Selling adulterated cream of tartar.

In Circuit Court, County of Muskegon, July 1, 1899:

Case pending. September

20, 1899: Defendant arraigned. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury. Defendant acquitted.

CASE NO. 123.

PEOPLE VS. CHARLES H. CAMP.

(W. J. Quan & Co.)

Charge: Selling adulterated vinegar.

In Justice Court, City of Muskegon, July 1, 1899: Case pending. July 18, 1899: Defendant arraigned. Plea of not guilty withdrawn and a plea of guilty entered. Fined $50.00 and $10.00 costs.

CASE NO. 124.

PEOPLE VS. PHIPPS, PENOYER & CO.

Charge: Selling adulterated cream of tartar.

Ex

In Justice Court, City of Caro, July 1, 1899: Case pending. July 7, 1899: amination held. Defendant bound over to the Circuit Court for the County of Tuscola for trial. In the Circuit Court for the County of Tuscola. September 6, 1899: Defendant arraigned. Motion to quash information made and denied. 1899: Defendant entered a plea of guilty. Fined $100.00 and costs.

CASE NO. 125.

PEOPLE VS. CHARLES P. DOWNEY.

Charge: Serving oleomargarine in hotel without displaying sign.

September 11,

In Justice Court, City of Lansing. August 29, 1899. Complaint made by L. H. Kirtland, Inspector. September 22, 1899: Statute under which complaint was made repealed by act of legislature. Case nolle prossed.

CASE NO. 126.

PEOPLE VS. ISAAC N. BROWN.

Charge: Serving oleomargarine in hotel without displaying sign.

In Justice Court, City of Lansing, August 29, 1899. Complaint made by L. H. Kirtland, Inspector. September 22, 1899: Statute under which complaint was made repealed by act of legislature. Case nolle prossed.

CASE NO. 127.

PEOPLE VS. FRANK WENTWORTH.

Charge: Serving oleomargarine in hotel without displaying sign.

In Justice Court, City of Lansing, August 29, 1899. Complaint made by L. H. Kirtland, Inspector. September 22, 1899: Statute under which complaint was made repealed by act of legislature. Case nolle prossed.

« AnteriorContinuar »