Fourth Generation EvaluationSAGE Publications, 1989 - 294 páginas Publisher's description: Fourth Generation Evaluation represents a monumental shift in evaluation practice. Guba and Lincoln point to the inherent problems faced by previous generations of evaluators--politics, ethical dilemmas, imperfections and gaps, inconclusive deductions--and lay the blame for failure and nonutilization at the feet of the unquestioned reliance on the scientific/positivist paradigm of research. Fourth Generation Evaluation, a more informed and sophisticated approach, moves beyond science to include the myriad human, political, social, cultural, and contextual elements that are involved. Based upon relativism, a unity between knower and known, and a subjective epistemology, the authors show how fourth generation evaluation unites the evaluator and the stakeholders in an interaction that creates the product of the evaluation. Differing from previously existing generations, this new approach moves evaluation to a new level, whose key dynamic is negotiation. The constructivist paradigm is espoused by the authors and shown to offer multiple advantages, including empowerment and enfranchisement of stakeholders, as well as an action orientation that defines a course to be followed. Not merely a treatise on evaluation theory, Guba and Lincoln also comprehensively describe the differences between the positivist and constructivist paradigms of research, and provide a practical plan of the steps and processes in conducting a fourth generation evaluation. |
Contenido
Foreword | 17 |
What Is Fourth Generation Evaluation? | 50 |
What Is This Constructivist Paradigm Anyway? | 79 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 5 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
action agenda for negotiation American Evaluation Association analysis approach argue assertion assessment audiences basic belief system believe CC&I Chapter claims client concerns consensus constructivist inquiry constructivist paradigm constructors context conventional paradigm criteria determine developed emerge emic epistemological ethical evaluand evaluator's example exist experience fact findings fourth generation evaluation given hermeneutic circle hermeneutic dialectic human identified informed and sophisticated informed consent inputs instrument interaction internal validity interpretation involved issues joint construction judgment Lincoln & Guba means methodology methods Michael Scriven naturalistic evaluation Naturalistic Inquiry nature objective observation participants persons political positivism positivist possible problem proposition qualitative qualitative methods Qualitative research questions realist ontology reality reconstruction represent require respondents role scientific scientists sense simply social socially constructed realities stake stakeholder groups standards subjects tacit knowledge theorems theory tion truth value-free value-pluralism values