Report of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Alabama, Volumen3West Publishing Company, 1912 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 8
... charge of self defense which singles out a part of the evidence and gives it undue prominence , and limits the question of freedom from fault and duty to retreat to a restricted ' time , and which is involved in its statements as to ...
... charge of self defense which singles out a part of the evidence and gives it undue prominence , and limits the question of freedom from fault and duty to retreat to a restricted ' time , and which is involved in its statements as to ...
Página 13
... charge set out ignores the element of retreat . The third charge set out as refused singles out a part of the evidence and gives undue prominence to it and limits the question of freedom from fault and duty to retreat . to a restricted ...
... charge set out ignores the element of retreat . The third charge set out as refused singles out a part of the evidence and gives undue prominence to it and limits the question of freedom from fault and duty to retreat . to a restricted ...
Página 14
... charge that whether the danger was real or apparent makes no difference provided it was such as to convince a reason- able man that it was necessary for him to act to save himself does not relieve the charge of the vice pointed out , as ...
... charge that whether the danger was real or apparent makes no difference provided it was such as to convince a reason- able man that it was necessary for him to act to save himself does not relieve the charge of the vice pointed out , as ...
Página 15
... charged it is not rendered inadmissible because tending to prove defendant's guilt of another offense . 5. Charge of Court ; Reasonable Doubt . - Where there were con- flicts in the evidence , it was error to refuse to charge that if ...
... charged it is not rendered inadmissible because tending to prove defendant's guilt of another offense . 5. Charge of Court ; Reasonable Doubt . - Where there were con- flicts in the evidence , it was error to refuse to charge that if ...
Página 16
... Charge 38 is in almost the exact language . JAMES J. RAY , for appellant . The point that the in- dictment was void ... charge of the court with citation of authority . Counsel also discuss the charges refused with citation of authority ...
... Charge 38 is in almost the exact language . JAMES J. RAY , for appellant . The point that the in- dictment was void ... charge of the court with citation of authority . Counsel also discuss the charges refused with citation of authority ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
57 South action affidavit affirmative charge agent Alabama alleged Anniston appellant appellant's appellee appellee's assignments of error Assistant Attorney Assumpsit averments bill of exceptions Birmingham Railway Bros charges requested Circuit Court City Court claim Code Coffee County complaint Constitution contract contributory negligence convicted Counsel discuss court erred Cullman county damages Decided Jan defendant's delivered Demmins demurrer dence detinue ditch entitled evidence tending fact fendant filed grand jury guilty Harmless Error Heard Heard before Hon indictment injury Jefferson county Jonesboro levy Light & Power liquor ment mortgage motion negligence objection offense oral charge overruling party person plaintiff plea pleading properly refused question R. C. BRICKELL reasonable record Reversed and remanded reversible error rule sheriff statute sufficient supra sustained telegram tending to show testified testimony tion trial court verdict W. L. MAR WALKER Western Union Western Union Telegraph witness
Pasajes populares
Página 541 - ... no officer, agent, or representative shall have such power or be deemed or held to have waived such provisions or conditions unless such waiver, if any, shall be written upon or attached hereto, nor shall any privilege or permission affecting the insurance under this policy exist or be claimed by the insured unless so written or attached.
Página 541 - This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing stipulations and conditions, together with such other provisions, agreements, or conditions as may be indorsed hereon or added hereto, and no officer, agent, or other representative of this company shall have power to waive any provision or condition of this policy except such as by the terms of this policy may be the subject of agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto...
Página 572 - SECTION 1. The judicial power of the State shall be vested in the Senate, sitting as a court of impeachment, in a Supreme Court, District Courts of Appeal, Superior Courts, Justices of the Peace, and such inferior courts as the Legislature may establish in any incorporated city or town, or city and county.
Página 644 - The verdict of the jury was as follows: "We, the jury, find for the defendant, HW Moore, one-half of the 1,020 acres of land claimed by him.
Página 485 - If the Jury believe from the- evidence in this case that at the time of the...
Página 232 - The records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any State or Territory, or of any such country, shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, that the said attestation is in due form.
Página 36 - But the defendant is in no position to complain of the action of the court...
Página 540 - This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy...
Página 37 - Before the jury can convict the defendant they must be satisfied to a moral certainty not only that the proof is consistent with...
Página 634 - There are three assignments of error; the first being that the court erred in refusing to grant defendant a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the Jury was contrary to the law and the evidence.