Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Trial of Judge Pickering.

Mr. TRACY reported from the committee appointed on the 3d instant to examine precedents, and to prepare the forms necessary in the trial of John Pickering, impeached by the House of Representatives of high crimes and misdemeanors; and the report was read.

Ordered, That it be printed for the use of the members.

The Court adjourned to 12 o'clock to-morrow.

TUESDAY, January 10.

The Court took into consideration the report of the committee made yesterday; and, after discusson, and agreeing that the words "Michael McClary, Esq., marshal of the district of New Hampshire," in the first resolution, should be struck out, Ordered, That the report be recommitted to the original committee, further to report thereon. The Court adjourned to 12 o'clock to-morrow.

WEDNESDAY, January 11.

Mr. TRACY, from the committee appointed on the 3d instant to examine precedents, and to prepare the forms necessary in the trial of John Pickering, impeached by the House of Representatives of high crimes and misdemeanors, made report in part, which was read; and, after progress, The Court adjourned to 11 o'clock to-morrow morning.

THURSDAY, January 12.

The Court resumed the consideration of the report made yesterday.

On motion, to fill the second blank in the form of the writ of summons, prescribing the day on which the defendant shall appear, with the words "second Tuesday of December next," it passed in the negative-yeas 6, nays 21, as follows:

YEAS-Messrs. Bradley, Brown, Condit, Jackson, Plumer, and Samuel Smith.

ments, articles of impeachment against you the said John Pickering, charging you with high crimes and misdemeanors, therein specially set forth in the words following, viz: [Here insert the articles] And did demand that you the said John Pickering should be put to answer the accusations of high crimes and misdemeanors, as set forth in said articles; and that such proceedings, examinations, trials, and judgments, might be thereupon had, as are agreeable to law and justice. You, the said John Pickering, are therefore hereby summoned to be and appear before the Senate of the United States of America, in their capacity of a Court of Impeachments, at their chamber in the City of Washington, on the second day of March next, then and there to answer to the said articles of impeachment, and then and there to abide by, obey, and perform, such orders and judgments as the Senate of the United States, acting in their said capacity of a Court of Impeachments, shall make in the premises, according to the Constitution and laws of the said United States. Hereof you are not to fail.

Witness, AARON BURR, Vice President of the United States of America, and President of the Senate thereof, at the City of Washington, this 12th day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and four, and of the Independence of the United States the twenty-eighth.

the Senate, and sealed with their seal, and served by Which summons shall be signed by the Secretary of

James Mathers, Sergeant-at-Arms to the Senate, who shall serve the same pursuant to the directions given in the next following resolution;

2d Resolved, That a precept shall be endorsed on said writ of summons, in the form following, viz: United States of America. ss.

The Senate of the United States, in their capacity of a Court of Impeachments, to James Mathers, Sergeantat-Arms to the Senate, greeting: You are hereby commanded to deliver to and leave with John Pickering, Esq., district judge of the district of New Hampshire, if to be found, a true and attested copy of the within writ of summons, together with a like copy of this precept, showing him both; or in case he cannot with convenience

NAYS-Messrs. Adams, Anderson, Armstrong, Bald-be found, you are to leave true and attested copies of win, Breckenridge, Cocke, Franklin, Hillhouse, Logan, Maclay, Nicholas, Olcott, Pickering, Potter, I. Smith, John Smith, Tracy, Venable, Wells, White, and Worthington.

On motion, it was agreed to fill the blank with the words, "second day of March next."

On motion, it was agreed to fill the blank in the clause of the report providing that the Secretary of the Senate advance a sum of money out of the contingent fund, towards the travelling expenses of the Sergeant-at-Arms, with the words "two hundred dollars."

And the report having been further amended, was adopted, as follows:

Resolved, That a summons issue, directed to the said John Pickering, in the form following:

United States of America-sct:

The Senate of the United States of America, in their capacity of a Court of Impeachments, to John Pickering, judge of the district court for the district of New Hampshire, greeting:

Whereas the House of Representatives of the United States of America did, on the fourth day of January, exhibit to the Senate, then sitting as a Court of Impeach

the said summons and precept at his usual place of residence; and in which ever way you perform the service, let it be done at least thirty days before the appearance day mentioned in the said writ of summons. Fail not, and make return of this writ of summons and precept, with your proceedings thereon endorsed, on or before the appearance day therein mentioned in said writ of summons. Witness, AARON BURR, Vice President of the United States of America, and President of the Senate thereof, at the City of Washington, this 12th day of January, in the year of our Lord 1804, and of the Independence of the United States the twenty-eighth. the Senate, and sealed with their seal. Which precept shall be signed by the Secretary of

and he is hereby, directed to pay the necessary expenses 3d. Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate be, arising upon the process aforesaid, after the same shall be allowed by the President of the Senate for the time being, out of the fund appropriated to defray the contingent expenses of the two Houses of Congress, and the Secretary of the Senate is hereby authorized and directed to advance, out of said fund, to said James Mathers, for his travelling expenses, the sum of two hundred dollars, to be by said James Mathers accounted for in a final settlement for his services.

Trial of Judge Pickering.

4th. Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate do acquaint the House of Representatives of the foregoing resolutions, and deliver to them a copy of the same.

Mr. TRACY, from the committee last mentioned, further reported, in part, and the report was amended, as follows:

Resolved, That whenever application shall be made to the Secretary of the Senate for a subpoena or subpœnas for witnesses, by the House of Representatives, either by their managers of the impeachment, or in any other proper way, or by the party impeached, or his counsel, acknowledged as such, by the Senate, sitting as a Court of Impeachments, he shall issue to such applicant a subpoena, or subpœnas, in the following form, viz :

To [here name the witnesses and residence] Greeting: You and each of you are hereby commanded, laying aside all excuses, to appear before the Senate of the United States, in their capacity of a Court of Impeachments, on the day of at the Senate Chamber, in the City of Washington, then and there to testify your knowledge in the cause which is before said Court of Impeachments for trial, in which the House of Representatives have impeached John Pickering, judge of the district court for the district of New Hampshire, of high crimes and misdemeanors. Fail not. Witness, AARON BURR, Vice President of the United States of America, and President of the Senate thereof, at the City of Washington, this day of, in the year of our Lord 1804, and of the Independence of the United States the twenty-eighth.

Which shall be signed by the Secretary of the Senate and sealed with their seal.

Which subpoenas shall be directed in every case to the marshal of the districts where such witnesses reside, to serve and return.

Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate do issue twelve subpoenas for witnesses, in the above form, for the use of the said Pickering, with blanks therein for such witnesses as he the said Pickering may think proper to summon, which subpoenas shall be delivered by the Sergeant-at-Arms to him at the time he shall serve the summons aforesaid, on the said Pickering.

On the question to adopt this report, as amended, it was determined in the affirmative-yeas 23, nays 5, as follows:

YEAS-Messrs. Anderson, Armstrong, Baldwin, Bradley, Breckenridge, Brown, Cocke, Condit, Ellery, Franklin, Logan, Maclay, Nicholas, Pickering, Potter, Israel Smith, John Smith, Samuel Smith, Stone, Tracy, Wells, White, and Worthington.

NAYS-Messrs. Adams, Hillhouse, Olcott, Plumer, and Venable.

Ordered, That the Secretary lay these resolutions before the House of Representatives.

The Court adjourned to 12 o'clock to morrow.

FRIDAY, January 13.

Form of direction to the Marshal for the service of the subpana. [L. S.] The Senate of the United States of America, sitting as a Court of Impeachments: To the Mar

shal of the district of

You are hereby commanded to serve and return the within subpoena according to law.

and of the Independence of the United States the twenty-eighth.

[From January 13 to Febuary 9 the Court met and adjourned, without transacting any business.]

THURSDAY, February 9.

The following return made by the Sergeantat-Arms, on the summons issued against John Pickering, was filed; also, his return of the subpœna served upon Michael McClary, to wit: United States of America, ss.

I, James Mathers, Sergeant-at-Arms to the Senate of the United States, in obedience to the within summons, did proceed to the house of the within named John Pickering, on the twenty-fifth day of January, in the year one thousand eight hundred and four, and did then and there leave a true copy of the said writ of summons, together with a true copy of the articles of impeachment annexed, with him the said John Pickering. JAMES MATHERS. United States of America, ss.

I, James Mathers, Sergeant-at-Arms to the Senate of the United States, did, on the twenty-sixth day of January, in the year one thousand eight hundred and four, proceed to the house of the within named Michael McClary, and served this subpoena by reading the same, and leaving with him a copy thereof.

JAMES MATHERS.

The Court adjourned to 12 o'clock on Monday next.

MONDAY, February 20.

The returns of the Sergeant-at-Arms on the writ against John Pickering was read; also, the return on the subpoena issued in the case of Michael McClary, marshal of the district of New Hampshire.

The Court adjourned to 12 o'clock on Monday

next.

[The Court met daily, but no business reported on the Record till]

THURSDAY, March 1.

Mr. TRACY, from the committee appointed to examine precedents, and to prepare the forms necessary in the trial of John Pickering, made a report, which was in part adopted.

The Court adjourned to 12 o'clock to-morrow.

FRIDAY, March 2.

The PRESIDENT administered the oaths prescribed to Messrs. JOHN SMITH of New York, SUMTER, and WRIGHT.

The report of the committee, appointed to examine precedents, and to prepare forms necessary in the trial of John Pickering, impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors was resumed, and sundry amendments agreed to; and the report was adopted, as follows:

Resolved, That the President of the Senate shall direct all the forms of proceeding, while the Senate are sitting as a Court of Impeachments, as to opening, adDated at Washington, this day of, in the journing, and all forms during the session, not otheryear of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and four,wise specially provided for by the Senate.

Trial of Judge Pickering.

And that the President of the Senate be requested to direct the preparations in the Senate Chamber for the accommodation of the Senate while sitting as a Court, and for the reception and accommodation of the parties to the impeachment, their counsel, witnesses, &c.

If a Senator wishes a question to be put to a witness, it shall be reduced to writing, and put by the President.

The summons to John Pickering was read, together with the return made thereon by the Sergeant-at-Arms, and the oath prescribed was

And that he be authorized to direct the employment of the marshal, or any officer, or officers, of the District of Columbia, during the session of the Court of Im-administered to the returning officer by the Secpeachments, whose services he may think requisite, and which can be obtained for the purpose.

And all the expenses arising under this resolution, after being first allowed by the President of the Senate, shall be paid by the Secretary, out of the fund appropriated to defray the contingent expenses of both Houses of Congress.

Resolved, That, on the second day of March instant, at one o'clock, the Legislative and Executive business of the Senate be postponed, and that the Court of Impeachments shall then be opened. After which, the process, which, on the twelfth day of January last, was directed to be issued and served on John Pickering, and the return thereon, shall be read. And the Secretary of the Senate shall administer an oath to the returning officer, in the following form, to wit:

retary.

Subpoenas having been issued in the form prescribed, and directed for service to the marshal of the district of New Hampshire, upon Joseph Whipple, John S. Sherburne, Jonathan Steele, Richard Cutts Shannon, Thomas Chadbourne, Edward Hart, and Ebenezer Chadwick, the following return was made to them respectively:

NEW HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT, 88.

January 28, 1804. Pursuant to this precept, I have served the same by reading it to the within named Ebenezer Chadwick, &c. MICHAEL M'CLARY,

Marshal for the New Hampshire district. Ordered, That the Secretary give notice to the House of Representatives that the Senate, in their "I, James Mathers, do solemnly swear, that the re- capacity of a Court of Impeachments, are ready turn made and subscribed by me, upon the process to proceed upon the impeachment of John Pickissued on the twelfth day of January last, by the Sen-ering, in the Senate Chamber, which Chamber is ate of the United States, against John Pickering, is prepared with accommodations for the reception truly made, and that I have performed said services as of the House of Representatives; and that the there described. So help me God." Secretary communicate a copy of the regulations agreed on to that House.

Which oath shall be entered at large on the records. The Secretary shall then give notice to the House of Representatives, that the Senate, in their capacity Whereupon, the managers on the part of the of a Court of Impeachments, are ready to proceed upon House of Representatives attended; and the said the impeachment of John Pickering, in the Senate John Pickering was three times called, to answer Chamber, which Chamber is prepared with accommo- the articles of impeachment exhibited against dations for the reception of the House of Representa-him by the House of Representatives, but came

tives.

not.

Petition of Jacob S. Pickering.

At a Court of Impeachments holden before the honorable the Senate of the United States of America, sitting in their capacity of a High Court of Impeachment at the City of Washington, on the second day of March, 1804:

Resolved, That counsel for the parties shall be ad- A petition of Jacob S. Pickering, son of John mitted to appear and be heard upon said impeachment. Pickering, and a letter from Robert G. Harper, And upon the attendance of the House of Representa- enclosed to the Vice President, were submitted by tives, their managers, or any person, or persons admit-him to the court, and read as follows: ted to appear for the impeachment, the said John Pickering shall be called to appear and answer the articles of impeachment exhibited against him. If he appears, or any person for him, the appearance shall be recorded, stating particularly if by himself, or if by agent or attorney-naming the person appearing, and the capacity in which he appears. If he does not appear, either personally or by agent or attorney, the same shall be recorded. All motions made by the parties or their counsel shall be addressed to the President of the Senate, and, if he shall require it, shall be committed to Jacob S. Pickering, of Portsmouth, in the district of writing, and read at the Secretary's table; and, after New Hampshire, and son of the said John Pickering, the parties shall be heard upon such motion, the Senate against whom articles of impeachment have been exhibshall retire to the adjoining committee room for con-ited by the House of Representatives of the United sideration, if one-third of the members present shall require it; but all decisions shall be had in open court, by ayes and noes, and without debate, which shall be

entered on the records.

Witnesses shall be sworn in the following form, viz: "I, A B, do swear (or affirm, as the case may be,) that the evidence I shall give to this court in the case now depending shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help me God."

Witnesses shall be examined by the party producing them, and then cross examined in the usual form.

If a Senator is called as a witness, he shall be sworn and give his testimony standing in his place.

The House of Representatives of the United States, vs. John Pickering, judge of the district court for the district of New Hampshire:

States, conceives it his duty most respectfully to state to this high and honorable Court, the real situation of the said John Pickering, the facts and circumstances relative to said articles, wherein he stands charged of supposed high crimes and misdemeanors, and to request that this court would grant him such term of time as they shall think fit and reasonable to substantiate this statement.

Your petitioner will be able to show that, at the time when the crimes wherewith the said John stands charged, are supposed to have been committed, the said John was, and for more than two years before, and ever since has been, and now is, insane, his mind

Trial of Judge Pickering.

wholly deranged, and altogether incapable of transacting any kind of business which requires the exercise of judgment, or the faculties of reason; and, therefore, that the said John Pickering is incapable of corruption of judgment, no subject of impeachment, or amenable to any tribunal for his actions.

That this derangement has been constant and permanent, every day of his life completely demonstrating his insanity; every attempt for his relief, which has been prescribed by the Faculty, who have been consulted on his case, has proved unavailing, and his disorder has baffled all medical aid.

Your petitioner is well aware that the most conclusive evidence of the aforegoing fact would result from an actual view of the respondent, which unfortunately, by reason of his great infirmities cannot now be, but at the hazard of his life-he is wholly unable at this inclement season to support the fatigue of so long a journey; yet if the respondent's life be spared, and his health in any degree restored, it will be the endeavor of your petitioner, that the said John shall make his personal appearance before this honorable court at any future day they shall think proper to assign.

Your petitioner will be able to show, any pretence to the contrary notwithstanding, that the decisions made in the cause stated in the first article of impeachment, although not the result of reflection, or grounded on any deductions of reason, were, nevertheless, correct, perfectly consonant to the principles of justice, and conformable to the laws of the land; and the refusal of the said judge to grant the appeal claimed by the said John S. Sherburne, in behalf of the United States, was not against law, or to the injury of the public revenue, as the third article of the impeachment supposes; there being no law to warrant such appeal in such a case.

While, with deep humility, your petitioner admits and greatly laments the indecorous and improper expressions used by the said judge on the seat of justice, as mentioned in the last article of impeachment, he will clearly evince the injustice of that part thereof which respects his moral character, and show abundantly, that from his youth upward, through a long, laborious, and useful life, and until he was visited by the most awful dispensation of Providence, and the most deplorable of all human calamities, the loss of reason, he was unexceptionable in his morals, remarkable for the purity of his language, and the correctness of his habits, and the deviations in these particulars now complained of, are irresistible evidence of the deranged state of his mind.

When this high and honorable Court shall take into their consideration the situation of this respondent, oppressed with infirmity, incapable of making arrangements for his defence, the inclemency of the season, his great distance from the place of trial, and the shortness of notice—when your honors reflect on the high and atrocious crime with which he stands charged; in the decision of which is involved, not his life, (indeed his remains of life would be but a slender sacrifice,) but that which, to an honest mind, is more dear than life itself, his good name-when you advert to the consequences attached to a conviction; the indelible stigma which will befall a numerous family whose only patrimony was the unsullied reputation of their parent, which they have ever cherished, and of which they fondly, perhaps too fondly, hoped, no time, or circumstance, or adverse fortune could deprive themwhen your honors shall think of these things, your petitioner has strong confidence that the wisdom and justice of this Court will permit a respondent,

whose integrity until now has been unexpected; who has sustained offices high and honorable, through a long life, and the general tenor of whose character and conduct has hitherto furnished him with a coat of armor against the assaults of his enemies, but who is now incapable of defending himself, to be defended by his friends.

Audi alteram partem is a maxim held in reverence wherever liberty yet remains. The Senate of America will be the last tribunal on earth that will cease to respect it; they will never condemn unheard; they will never refuse time for a full and impartial trial.

That time, that impartial trial, your petitioner prays for; the charity of the law presumes the innocence of the respondent; and your petitioner, also, respectfully entreats that, in the meantime, and more especially as the evidence on which the impeachment is founded, was taken ex parte, no unfavorable impressions may be made on the minds of this honorable Court, by any report or extra-judicial representations which may have been made on the subject before them.

JACOB S. PICKERING.

Letter of Robert G. Harper.

SIR: Mr. Jacob S. Pickering, the son of Judge Pickering of New Hampshire, has forwarded to me, through one of his friends here, the enclosed petition, with a request that I will lay it before the Court of Impeachments, and will appear on his part, if permitted, and support the prayer of it. I am also furnished with several depositions, showing that Judge Pickering, from bodily infirmity, and total derangement of mind, is wholly incapable of appearing before the Court at this time, of making a defence, or of giving authority to any person to appear for him.

The process of subpoena heretofore issued by the Court not being compulsory, and Judge Pickering's narrow circumstances not enabling his son to defray the expenses of the witnesses whose testimony it is important for him to produce, it was judged necessary to serve the subpoena. The object of the petition is to obtain a postponement of the trial, and either compulsory process, or an order to take depositions, which may be received in evidence. Be pleased, sir, to lay the petition before the Court, and to inform me whether I shall be received to appear on the part of the petitioner, Mr. Jacob S. Pickering, in its support. In that case I will attend in the capacity of agent or counsel for the petitioner, and submit to the Court the reasons and proofs with which I am furnished in support of his application.

With the highest respect, I have the honor to be, sir, your most obedient very humble servant,

ROBERT G. HARPER.

[blocks in formation]

honorable Court in the case now before it, Į Mr. President: Before I proceed to address this think it proper to repeat explicitly what is stated in the letter just now read, that I do not appear as the counsel, agent, or attorney of Judge Pickering, or by virtue of any authority derived from him, he being in a state of absolute and long-continued insanity, can neither appear himself nor authorize another to appear for him. I present myself to this honorable Court, at the request of

Trial of Judge Pickering.

Jacob S. Pickering, son of Judge Pickering, stating his father's insanity, and praying that time may be allowed for collecting and producing complete proof of the melancholy fact. This application for postponement I am prepared to support by depositions now in my possession; and it is also my intention, if permitted, to make a further application on the part of Judge Pickering, for compulsory process to compel the attendance of such witnesses as it may be necessary to produce in proof of the fact of insanity, or for an order to take their depositions in writing on interrogatories, and notice to the prosecutors.

It rests with this honorable Court whether it will receive such an application, and hear counsel so appearing in its support.

After a short pause, Mr. HARPER again rose and inquired, whether his appearance in support of the petition would be construed as the appearance of John Pickering, by counsel ?

The PRESIDENT answered, he presumed that it would not be so construed.

Mr. NICHOLAS, in behalf of the managers, objected to the hearing of Mr. HARPER, in any other capacity than as counsel of the accused; and remarked, that, as Mr. HARPER disclaimed appearing in that capacity, he could not, in his opinion, be heard.

Several additional remarks, to the same point, were made by Messrs. G. W. CAMPBELL, EARLY, and J. RANDOLPH.

Mr. RODNEY.-Mr. President; I rise to make a few observations on this case, in addition to those which have fallen from my colleagues who have preceded me; and to submit to the consideration of this Court remarks which have suggested themselves to my mind, on the application made, at the present stage of this business.

to decide that the case is properly before them, agreeably to the rules which have been established. If no appearance in person nor by attorney has been entered, unless proceedings have been had which they shall consider tantamount to an appearance, there is no cause regularly in Court, and it would be idle for any person to talk of postponing the consideration of that which really was not before the Court. A question of this kind must, from the nature of it, ever be incidental to the principal or main question. When a writ is in court according to the rules of the court, a motion for postponement may with propriety, if the circumstances justify it, be made. This must always be a subsequent consideration, after the court are in full possession of the case. Agreeably to the correct course of proceeding in ordinary courts, until bail and appearance, there can be no case in court. The party has no day given him, because he is, until this takes place, considered to be out of Court; nor would any counsel, though duly authorized, be heard in his behalf. There has in his case, then, been no appearance in person or by agent or counsel. The accused has made default, and no agent or attorney has been recorded for him. Surely then his default should be first recorded, and if the Court consider that after his having been duly served, and making default, they will proceed to a hearing and determination of the principal question, it will then be proper to listen to those which are necessarily incidental. It will be at this stage of the business competent for the Court, if at all, to hear the gentleman. But I am decidedly of opinion, there is no period in which it will be proper so to do, unless he claims this right as the agent or counsel of the accused. In that capacity he has a right to be heard-and in that capacity alone. Our Constitution has wisely secured to every man this privilege, and I would not deprive the humblest object in the community of this inestimable benefit. I flatter myself, therefore, that this honorable Court will adhere strictly to the rules which they have prescribed for themselves, and that they will for these reasons, and those which have been assigned by my colleague, refuse the present application.

Mr. HARPER inquired, whether it would be regular in him to reply to these remarks?

I understand the President as having declared that, agreeably to the rules of proceeding adopted by the Senate, no person can be heard in this case but the accused, or his agent or counsel. I believe I have correctly understood what was expressed, (the Vice President nodded assent;) I also understand the gentleman who appeared on this occasion, as clearly and explicitly stating, that he does not appear as the counsel of Mr. Pickering, nor does he wish it so to be understood. That gentleman has informed us in a very fair and candid manner of the only character in which he does appear, and has assumed very properly and correctly the only ground upon which he wishes to stand. He has in positive terms disavowed the idea of his being the agent or counsel of the accused, because he has protested against Mr. Whereupon the Senate retired to a private Pickering's being affected by any act done by him. chamber; from which they returned about three On this single ground then, I respectfully submit o'clock, when the PRESIDENT advised the manwhether it would be proper to hear the gentle-agers that the Senate would take further time to man under these circumstances, and whether it be not manifested that he does not come within the rules laid down by the Senate for the government of this High Court of Impeachments.

But if the gentleman is to be heard on this subject in the anomalous character in which he appears, with a view of postponing the proceedings of this Court, it will first be necessary for the Court

The PRESIDENT said, it would not; and immemediately after put the question to the Senate, whether Mr. HARPER should be heard in support of the prayer of the petition of Jacob S. Pickering.

consider the question before them, and would make them acquainted with their decision.

During the ensuing day and Monday, the Senate were engaged in private debate on granting the prayer of the petition; about four o'clock of the last day their doors were opened, and the sense of the Senate taken on the following question:

On the question, "Will the Court hear evidence

« AnteriorContinuar »