 The burden to show discrimination rests on the party challenging the validity of the statute, but "[w]hen discrimination against commerce * * * is demonstrated, the burden falls on the State to justify it both in terms of the local benefits flowing from...  Coordination Act--Lacey Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Fisheries ... - Página 147por United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment - 1980 - 346 páginasVista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | Nicholas A. Robinson, Kevin Reilly - 2023 - 1386 páginas
...discriminates against interstate commerce has met the burden of proof, then the state must justify its statute "in terms of the local benefits flowing from the statute...alternatives adequate to preserve the local interests at stake."57 [b] — "Flow Control" Ordinances and Municipal Waste Disposal In more recent years, the... | |
 | Damien Geradin - 1997 - 268 páginas
...Washington State Apple Advertising Commission, 432 US 333 (1977) ('[w]hen discrimination against interstate commerce ... is demonstrated, the burden falls on...adequate to preserve the local interests at stake') (emphasis added). 9 See. eg, C&A Carbone Inc. v. Town ofClarckstown, 114 S. Ct 1,677 (1994); Oregon... | |
| |
