Deliberative Democracy and Its DiscontentsSamantha Besson, José Luis Martí Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2006 - 261 páginas Drawing on political, legal, national, post-national, as well as American and European perspectives, this collection of essays offers a diverse and balanced discussion of the current arguments concerning deliberative democracy. The essays consider the thr |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 65
Página ix
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Página xi
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Página 4
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Página 6
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Página 9
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido..
Contenido
Is the Ideal of a Deliberative Democracy Coherent? | 3 |
The Epistemic Conception of Deliberative Democracy Defended | 27 |
The Value Added by Theories of Deliberative Democracy | 57 |
Democracy and the Real Speech Situation | 75 |
Depoliticizing Democracy | 93 |
Conflict and SelfInterest in Deliberation | 107 |
Framing Public Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy in | 133 |
The People in Deliberative Democracy | 159 |
Francis Cheneval | 181 |
Institutional Reform and Democratic Legitimacy | 215 |
| 233 | |
| 253 | |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents Jose Luis Marti,Samantha Besson Vista previa limitada - 2017 |
Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents Jose Luis Marti,Samantha Besson Sin vista previa disponible - 2016 |
Términos y frases comunes
argue authors bargaining Benhabib Besson Bohman Cambridge University Press Christiano citizens civility claims Cohen Comitology commitment conception conflict consensus constitutional context cosmopolitan cosmopolitan democracy Court decision-making Deliberative Democracy Cambridge deliberative ideal deliberative model Deliberative Politics deliberative procedure democratic deliberation democratic legitimacy democratic theory demoi-cracy depoliticization deterritorialization Disagreement discussion Dryzek Elster epistemic value epistemic virtues Estlund European Commission European demos European Parliament European Union Fishkin Goodin Gutmann and Thompson Habermas hypothetical ideal deliberation ideal deliberative situation institutions interests issues judicial judicial review Jürgen Habermas legitimate liberal liberal democratic majoritarian Manin Mansbridge Martí meta-ethical moral mutual justifiability national demoi negotiation normative outcomes participants Pettit political community political decisions Political Theory possible post-national preferences principle problem public deliberation public sphere question reasons reflective equilibrium Rehg relevant representation representatives requires self-interest Social Choice Theory social rights Sunstein territorial transnational transparency voting
Pasajes populares
Página 233 - That the people have an original right to establish, for their future government, such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected.
Página 233 - Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both ; and that where the will of the legislature, declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people, declared in the Constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws rather than by those which are not fundamental.
Página 233 - The exercise of this original right is a very great exertion; nor can it, nor ought it, to be frequently repeated. The principles, therefore, so established are deemed fundamental. And as the authority from which they proceed is supreme and can seldom act, they are designed to be permanent.