Investigation of the Schools and Poverty in the District of Columbia, Hearings Before the Task Force on Antipoverty in the District of Columbia...89-1 and 2, October 7-8, 12, 26-27, 1965, and January 13, 1966
1966 - 868 páginas
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
ability achievement additional administration assistant average basic Board Board of Education budget building Chairman child classes committee complete concerned Congress cost counselors course cultural curriculum Department District of Columbia dropouts elementary schools enrollment fact families feel figures funds give given going grade graduates HANSEN hearings high school hope included income indicate interest junior high school kind mean Miss needs Negro Office opportunity parents percent performance population positions poverty prepared present problem projects public schools PUCINSKI pupils question reading reason record regular request responsibility retarded School Board school system segregation senior served social statement Superintendent talking teachers teaching things tion track system trying Washington youngsters
Página 270 - Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments. Compulsory school attendance laws and the great expenditures for education both demonstrate our recognition of the importance of education to our democratic society. It is required in the performance of our most basic public responsibilities, even service in the armed forces. It is the very foundation of good citizenship.
Página 574 - Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Página 387 - I think the time is coming when we are going to have to face up to the fact that if you want teachers and you want good policemen and you want good firemen, it costs money.
Página 270 - In approaching this problem, we cannot turn the clock back to 1868 when the Amendment was adopted, or even to 1896 when Plessy v. Ferguson was written. We must consider public education in the light of its full development and its present place in American life throughout the Nation. Only in this way can it be determined if segregation in public schools deprives these plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws.
Página 270 - In these days, it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority...
Página 451 - Our progress as a nation can be no swifter than our progress In education. Our requirements for world leadership, our hopes for economic growth, and the demands of citizenship itself in an era such as this all require the maximum development of every young American's capacity. The human mind is our fundamental resource.
Página 411 - Section 1. These bylaws may be amended at any regular or special meeting of the board...
Página 245 - How will you ever straighten up this shape; Touch it again with immortality; Give back the upward looking and the light; Rebuild in it the music and the dream; Make right the immemorial infamies, Perfidious wrongs, immedicable woes?
Página 270 - Liberty under law extends to the full range of conduct which the individual is free to pursue, and it cannot be restricted except for a proper governmental objective. Segregation in public education is not reasonably related to any proper governmental objective, and thus it imposes on Negro children of the District of Columbia a burden that constitutes an arbitrary deprivation of their liberty in violation of the Due Process Clause.