Cases and Materials on Local ApportionmentJoseph S. Ferrell Institute of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1965 - 265 páginas |
Contenido
Both Houses of State Legislatures must be apportioned | 4 |
No rigid mathematical test of apportionment plans favored | 4 |
Rights of plaintiffs are personal in nature | 4 |
Otras 4 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
14th Amendment action adopted Alabama Legislature applies apportioned areas Assembly Baker Baltimore City Board of County Board of Supervisors Carteret County census Charter citizens City Council Commission Commissioners represent five constitutionally Council of Baltimore councilmanic districts councilmen county board County Commissioners COUNTY Five commissioners county government County The governing Creek decision defendants defined by Sess dismissed District Court districts as defined effect elected at large enacted Equal Protection Clause equal representation exercise federal constitutional Fourteenth Amendment Gomillion governing board consists governmental Index of Inequality invalid Kent County L.Ed Laws legislative body legislative power legislative representation malapportionment ment Modified Plan N. C. Sess nominated and elected North Carolina plaintiffs political subdivisions population basis principle reapportion reapportionment redistricting registered voters represent five districts Reynolds right to vote S.Ct Sims State's statute Suffolk County supervisory districts Supp supra Supreme Court tion town townships unconstitutional validity Ward boundaries weighted voting Wesberry WMCA