Reports of Cases Decided in the Court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey, Volumen22Soney & Sage, 1871 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 39
Página 516
... witnesses was commenced on the 14th of May , 1868 , and the complainant was sworn as a witness in his own . behalf on the 26th of June , 1869 , under objection from the defendants ' counsel . Before the passage of the act of 1859 ...
... witnesses was commenced on the 14th of May , 1868 , and the complainant was sworn as a witness in his own . behalf on the 26th of June , 1869 , under objection from the defendants ' counsel . Before the passage of the act of 1859 ...
Página 566
... witnesses are necessary to overcome the answer of the defendant . This is not universally true ; one witness and corroborating circumstances are sufficient . " The early rule of the English Court of Chancery was that two witnesses were ...
... witnesses are necessary to overcome the answer of the defendant . This is not universally true ; one witness and corroborating circumstances are sufficient . " The early rule of the English Court of Chancery was that two witnesses were ...
Página 654
... WITNESS . Ib . 1. The complainant is inadmissible as a witness where the answer is by al 3 . party in a representative capacity . Sweet v . Parker , 453 The general rule is , that the com- petency of a witness is determined by his ...
... WITNESS . Ib . 1. The complainant is inadmissible as a witness where the answer is by al 3 . party in a representative capacity . Sweet v . Parker , 453 The general rule is , that the com- petency of a witness is determined by his ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
agreement alleged amount answer appear appellant apply assignment Atwater authority bill Black Boisaubin C. E. Green Camden and Amboy Canal Company Chancellor charter claim complainant connected consent consolidation Constitution construction contract convey conveyance corporation Court of Chancery court of equity creditors debts declared decree deed defendants Delaware and Raritan directors eminent domain entitled execution executor fact filed franchises fraud granted Hackensack Haughwout held highways injunction interest Jersey City Jersey Railroad Company judgment lands lease legislature Lemercier lessee lessors ment Morris Morris Canal mortgage Murphy notice object opinion owner paid pany parties payment Pennsylvania Railroad Company person Philadelphia and Trenton premises purchase money question Railway Raritan Canal Raritan Canal Co rent restrain road rule statute stockholders suit taken tion Trenton Railroad Company trust ultra vires United Companies usury Wardell widow witness York