Bench Vs. Bar, Or, Judicial Answers to Saloon ArgumentsAmerican Issue Publishing Company, 1910 - 47 páginas |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
BENCH VS BAR OR JUDICIAL ANSW Lemuel D. (Lemuel Dyer) B. 1862 Lilly Sin vista previa disponible - 2016 |
Términos y frases comunes
advocates of personal amount of crime Anti-Saloon Anti-Saloon League ardent spirits beer beverage bread and butter brewers cities citizen constitution contracts crime and misery declared demoralizing deprived destroys due process enact enforce exercise fair and liberal fourteenth amendment gambling immoral impaired individual inherent injury interfere judicial opinions Justice justified Kansas Prohibition legislation legislature LEMUEL D License liquor advocates liquor business liquor dealers Liquor League liquor traffic means ment misery to society moral character Mugler necessary Ohio Ohio Supreme Court option law pauperism and crime personal right police power preservation principles process of law promote proposition protect public morals public health public safety public welfare purposes reason restraint right to protect sale of intoxicating saloon business saloon revenue saloonkeeper secure selling intoxicating liquors source of crime statute Supreme Court things tion U. S. Supreme Court United States Supreme WESTERVILLE whiskey
Pasajes populares
Página 29 - Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy. A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or to despotism.
Página 45 - Generally it is for the Legislature to determine what laws and regulations are needed to protect the public health and secure the public comfort, and safety, and while its measures are calculated, intended, convenient and appropriate to accomplish these ends, the exercise of its discretion is not subject to review by the courts.
Página 5 - The power we allude to is rather the police power, the power vested in the legislature by the Constitution, to make, ordain, and establish all manner of wholesome and reasonable laws, statutes, and ordinances, either with penalties or without, not repugnant to the Constitution, as they shall judge to be for the good and welfare of the commonwealth and of the subjects of the same.
Página 37 - Amendment ; and it has never been regarded as incompatible with the principle, equally vital, because essential to the peace and safety of society, that all property in this country is held under the implied obligation that the owner's use of it shall not be injurious to the community.
Página 36 - If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution.
Página 38 - No legislature can bargain away the public health or the public morals. The people themselves cannot do it, much less their servants. The supervision of both these subjects of governmental power is continuing in its nature, and they are to be dealt with as the special exigencies of the moment may require.
Página 3 - Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.
Página 5 - Under it the conduct of an individual and the use of property may be regulated so as to interfere, to some extent, with the freedom of the one and the enjoyment of the other...
Página 24 - But the liberty secured by the Constitution of the United States to every person within its jurisdiction does not import an absolute right in each person to be, at all times and in all circumstances, wholly freed from restraint.
Página 26 - Nor can it be said that government interferes with or impairs any one's constitutional rights of liberty or of property when it determines that the manufacture and sale of intoxicating drinks, for general or individual use, as a beverage, are, or may become, hurtful to society, and constitute, therefore, a business in which no one may lawfully engage.