BANKSJer of unacceprockville v. s

Nationand. S. C.).....a title of its depoan v. Mason

110

BAIL. See Appeal.

PAGE | CARRIER OF PASSENGERS-Continued. PAGE.
BAILMENT. Conversion, a refusal or neglect to de-

5.- Negligence, contributory; injury to passenger on
liver an article unintentionally left in store, is prima

street railroad resulting from sitting on front plat-
facie evidence of. Osgoodby v. Limeburner (Buil.

form. Wills v. Lynn & B. R. R. Co. (Mass. S. C.) . 49
S. C ).......

114

6.-Duty to furnish safe means of alighting Foulkes
2.-Duty of pledgee of securities to collect interest ;

v. Metrop. Dist. Railway Co. (Eng. App.) ............. 38
negligenco; depreciation of securities. Whiton v.

CEMETERY. See Mortgage; Taxation.
Paul (R. I. S. C.) ....

.... 236
See Auctioneer; Criminal Law; Negligence.

CHARGE TO JURY. See Criminal Law.
BANKRUPTCY. Collection and conversion to his

CHILDREN. See Conflict of Law.
own use of the proceeds of a note by a bankrupt by CHINESE. See Constitutional Law.
a foreign correspondent does not fall within the ex.

CIVIL DAMAGE ACT. Statutory construction:
ception in act as to fiduciary debts. Green's Bank

"other person” does not include drinker. Brooks
v. Chilton (Miss. S. C.). .....

.. 382 |

v. Cook (Mich. S. C.).................
2.-Discharge of one partner does not release other.
Hill v. Trainer (Wis. S. C.)......

136 COMPOUNDING CRIME. See Consideration ;
......... 136 0

Public Policy.
BANKS AND BANKING. Action against bank
by holder of unaccepted check not maintainable.

CONFESSION. See Criminal Law.
National Bank of Brockville v. Second National CONFISCATION ACT. United States not liable

for moneys deposited in proceedings for confiscation.
2.-Bank may not dispute title of its depositor to do.

Branch v. U.S. (U.S. S. C.)................ .......
posit. First National Bank of Lock Haven v. Mason
(Penn. S. C.).........

412 | CONFLICT OF LAW. Attachment valid against
3.--Meaning of word "discount ;" includes purchase of

previous assignment for creditors in another State.
notes ; negotiable instrument;indorsement by part-

Pierce v. O'Brien (Mass. S. C.)...
ner of frin name without authority ; bona file

2.-Federal provision as to standing of State judgments,
holder; defense; corporation; notice. Atlantic

want of jurisdiction ; divorce. Morey y. Morey

(Minn. S. C.).............
State Bank v. Savely (N. Y. App.) ................ 454, 462

..................... ..... 397
4.-Liability for mistake; protesting negotiable instru-

3.-Foreign judgment; jurisdiction ; enticing party
ment for customer; custom ; current funds; grace.

into State to serve process. Wood v. Wood (Ky.
Haddock v. Citizens' Nat. Bank (Iowa S. C.) ....... 76

APP.) .... .......... ................ ..... ............ 456
5.--kight to appropriate securities of third person

1. Jurisdiction as to claims for moneys stolen from
deposited by debtor as his own. Wood v. Boylston

mails and recovered: trust deed of property stolen.
Nat. Bank (Mass. S. C.)...........

Laws y. Burt (Mass. S. C.).....

,... ...

inici

5.-Utah divorce without jurisdiction invalid : parol
See National Banks ; Savings Banks.

evidence showing want of jurisdiction. State of
BASTARDY. Evidence; not error to allow the

Iowa v. Fleak (lowa S. C.)........
alleged bastard child to be exhibited to jury to

6.-Legitimacy of children born abroad. Re Good-
determine resemblance to alleged putative father.

man's Trusts (Eng. Ch. D.)....
State v. Smith (Iowa S. C.).........................

7.--Domicile; Scoich marriage ; divorce. Harvie v.
BENEVOLENT SOCIETIES. Status of, insuring

Farnie (Eng. Pro. and A. D.)....,
the lives of their members. State of Missouri v.

8.-Law of Lower Canada as to sales of chattels -
Merchants' Ex. Mut. Ben. Soc. (Mo. S. C.)...........

comity will not be exercised to deprive citizen of

title. Edgerly v. Bush (N. Y. App.) .................. 15
BEQUEST. Of bonds does not include overdue cou-

pöns. McGrath v. Van Stavoren (N. Y. C. P.)........ 271 See Contract; Divorce; Marriage; Negotiable Instruments.
BIGAMY. See Criminal Law.

CONSIDERATION. Compounding a crime; need
BILL OF LADING Sets of three; rights of in-

not be felony to avoid contract McMahon v. Smith

(Conn. S. C.)...............
dorsee; entry under second bill; liability of ware-

... .........

....... 416
houseman. Glyn Mills & Co. v. East and W. I. D. Co. 2.-Illegal; proof of ; threat of prosecutio wope v.
(Eng. Q. B. D.)....

Jefferson Fire Ins. Co. (Penn. S. C.).....
"See Maritime Law.

See Married Woman.
BOARD OF AUDIT. See Mandamus.

CONSIGNMENT. Sale of consigned goods and
BONDS. Municipal; board of education; acts in issu-

goods of consignee at one time, right of action by
ing bonds in excess of power do not render bonds

consignor against purchaser. Roosevelt v. Doherty
void ; innocent holder. State of Ohio v. Board of

(Mass. S. C.)......... . .,
Education (Ohio S. C.). .. .. ........................ 118 CONSPIRACY. See Criminal Law.
2.-Coupon; holder not bound to present coupon within

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS. Ratif-
a reasonable time after due. Williamsport Gas Co.

cation of, by people. Matter of Indiana Constitu-
v. Pinkerton (Penn. S. C.).............. ........... 478

tional Amendments (Ind. S. C.)....................... 147
3.-Oficial; mistake in name of obligee does not invali-
date. County of Bay v. Brock (Mich. S. C.)...... .. 199
See Appeal; Municipal Corporations ; Suretyship

tutional. Mowery v. Salisbury (N.C.S. C.).......... 218

2.- Taxation, exemption by charter binding on State
BOTTOMRY. See Maritime Law.

(111. S. C.)................................................
BOUNDARY. Along highway. Leigh v. Jack (Eng. 3.-Eminent domain; taking private property for public
App.) .......

use ; assessment for sidewalk not. White y. People
BREACH OF PROMISE. See Marriage.

(II. S. C.) ..

4.- Eminent domain: railroad track in highway.
BUILDING ASSOCIATION. Usury; provisions.

Houston & Tex. C. R. R. Co. v. Odom (Tex. S. C.)... 157
of act of 1851, ch. 1222, 87. Erie Co. Savings Bank v.

5.--Act embracing limited district when not local; fish-
Baldwin (Buff. S. C.).....

............ 34

eries. Doughty y. Connover (N. J.S. C.)..............
BURIAL. Disinterment of body for surgical examin-

6.-Act requiring construction of fishways by dam
ation, what necessary to authorize. Grangers' Ins.

owners Unconstitutional. Woolever v. Stewart
Cu, v. Brown (Miss. S. C.)..........

.. 444 (Ohio S. C.)..... .............................

7.--Corporations, State under power to amend charter

cannot take away property rights from. City of De-
CARRIER OF ANIMALS. Liability beyond his

troit v. Detroit & 11. P. R. Co. (Mich. 8. C.)........... 95
own line. Stewart v. Terre Haute & Ind. R. R. Co.

8.--Chinese religious customs; State law regulating re-
(U.S. C. C., Mo.) ......................

moval of dead bodies valid. In re Wong Yung Quy
CARRIER OF GOODS. Lien for freight on goods

(U.S. C. C., Cal.).....
shipped by consignee of owner; when lien attaches.

9.-State cannot be sued without its consent. American
Hayes v. Campbell (Cal. S. C.)......... ......... 417

Dock & Imp. Co. v. Trustees of Public Schools
2.-Has no right to examine contents of parcels in

(N, J. Ch..................... ............ :
trusted to him. Dinsmore v. Louisville, New A. & C.

10.-Legislative authority as to concract of public officers:
R. R CC. (U. S. C. C., Ind.) ............

removing from office; “inisfeasance in office." Com-

....................... 435
3.-Bound to carry for another common carrier. Dins-

monwealth v. Williams (Ky. App.) .......
more v. Nashville R. R. Co, (U.S. C. C.. Ky.) ......

11.-Lottery grants not contracts protected by Federal

Constitution. Stone y. State (U.S.S. C.)
See Counter-claim; Maritime Law.

2.-Salary of judicial officers ; right of Legislature to
CARRIER OF PASSENGERS. Liability for

change term and compensation. State ex rel. Martin
merchandise as baggage. Pennsylvania Co. v. Miller

v. Kalb (W is. S. C.)...........
(Ohio S. C.)..................................... ... 223 13.-Effect of statute law upon provisions of Constitu-
2.- Liability of railroad company for injury to pas

tion. Morley v. Thayer (U, S. C. C., Mass.).....
senger in Pullman car. Pennsylvania Co, v. Roy (U. 14. -Statute shortening term of office of alderman
S. S. C.)....

.............. ..........
................ 510

valid: New York city. Long v. Mayor (N. Y. App.).. 196
3.--When not liable for injury to passenger. Interna-

15.-Municipality may not levy local tax for general pur-
tional & G. W. R. R. Co. v. llalloren (Tex. S. C.).....

poses. Dvar v, Farmington (Me. S. C.)................ 235
4.-Negligence; landing of passengers ; safe transit 16. - Impairing contract ; exemption from taxation;
must be provided by officers of steamboat. Eagle

Federal jurisdiction. Louisville & U. R. R. Co. V
Packet Co. v. Defries (III. S. C.)..................... 116 Gaines, Com't'r (U.S. C. C., Tenn.)................

..... 115

.......

.......... 423

CARRIER OF GOD

...... 396

.

... 372

S.

C.

.....

.........

......................

............

18

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Continued. PAGE.

PA&E.
17.-Impairing contract; statute impeding collection of CORPORATION. De facto, what is. Buffalo C. Ry.
judgment. State ex rel. Ranger v. New Orleans

Co. v. N. Y, Cent. R. Ř. Co. (Buff. S. C.)... ....... 134
(U.S. S. C.).....

. .

2.-De facto, mortgage to; estoppel. Erie County Sav-

............ 496
18.-Impairing obligation of contract; State law altering

ings Bank v. Baldwin (Buff. S. C.).................... 134
remedy. Hardin's Adm'r v. Taylor (Ky. App.)...... 457 3.-Issue of new certificate of stock without surrender
19.-Taxation; assessment for street sewer according to

of old ; liability for wrongful issue; dividends.
frontage and area valid, Cleveland v. Tripp (R. I.

Cleveland & M. R. Co. v. Tapett's Admrs. (Ohio
S. C.) .......

.......... 316
20.-Usury; statute abolishing penalty for, affects exist 4.- Notice ; when knowledge of director not that of“
ing defenses and is valid. Mosby v. St. Louis M.

corporation. Lothian v. Wood (Cal. S. C.)....
Ins. Co. (Va. S. C.).......

..... 56

Subscription to stock; what constitutes valid sub-
21.-Validating invalid contracts. U.S. Mortgage Co. v.

scription. Nulton v. Clayton (Iowa S. C.).......... 435
Gross (III. S. C.) ........................

........... 17 6.-Individual members of board of managers cannot
See Criminal Law; Elections; Insurance, Life: Na-

bind, and contracts not implied from their declara-
tional Banks.

tions. Allegheny County Work-house v. Moore
(Penn. S. C.).....

. . .. ................... ....... .. .... ..
CONTEMPT. Right to strike out answer for con-

7.-Rights of stockholders : foreclosure; formation of
tempt in action for divorce. Walker v. Walker (N.

new company. Thornton v. Wabash R’y Co. (N. Y.
Y. App.)..........

App.) ...
See Appeal; Municipal Corporations.

8.-Liability of company issuing a certificate of stock

under a forged transfer; estoppel. Sim v. Anglo-
CONTINGENT REMAINDER. See Wil.

American Tel. Co. (Eng. App.).................
CONTRABAND BUSINESS. Business privati

9.-Liability of trustee; presumption as to hol
juris and publici juris. Ladd v. Southern Cotion P.

over; assignment of stock. Philadelphia & R. C. &
& Mi'g Co. (Tex. S. C.)................................

I. Co. v Hotchkiss (N. Y. App.) ...
CONTRACT. Act of God, non-performance caused

10.-Sabbath breaking, may be indicted for. State v.

Balt, & O. R. R. Co. (W. Va, S. C.). ..........
by, no breach. Ward v. Vance (Penn. S. C.) .........

... ...

11.-Transfer of shares; liability of corporation for
2.-Conflict of laws; husband and wife; enforcement.

wrongful issue of certificate. Strange v. Houston
Hayden v. Stone (R. I. S. C.) ......

& T. C. Ry. Co. (Tex. S. C.)......
3.-Construction of; advertisement in book sold by 12.-Not a " person” within Pharmacy Act. Pharmaceu-
subscription. Burr & Hyde v. American S. S. Co. (

tical Society v. London & P. S. Asso. (Eng. App.).... 158
Y. App.) ............

13.-- When liable to officer of, for services. Santa Clara
4.--Consideration; marriage. Gerlock V. Steinke (DUI.

M. Asso. v. Meredith (Md. App.)................... 58

See Constitutional Law; Municipal Corporations;
5.-Deed for land accepted binds grantee not signing ;

Receiver; Taxation.
parol proof to contradict. Hubbard v. Marshall
7 W is. S. C.).......

.................. 338 COUNSEL. See Criminal Law.
6.-Duress; illegal consideration, compounding felony;
rescinding of contract. Heckman v. Swartz (Wis.

COUNTER-CLAIM. Arising out of same transac-
S. C.) ...

tion allowable, though not existing when action

................ 396
7.-Impossibility of performance; construction. Re

commenced, Howard v. Johnston (N, Y. App.)... 433
Arthur's Estate (Eng. Ch. D.)..

2.-When adinission of plaintiff's claim does not shut
8.-Inconsistent contracts ; right of action. Wilmott

out; carrier of goods; liability for damage to goods
v. Barber (Eng. Ch. D.)......

carried. Schwinger v. Raymond (N. Y. App.)........ 515

. .. ...... ... 358
9.-Lien in nature of a mortgage, what is. Sawyer v.

See Removal of Cuuses.
Gerrich (Me. S. C.).....

................... 3

COUPON. See Bonds.
10.--Representations influencing conduct; mutuality;

COUSIN. Who are second cousins ? Re Parker ;
interest in lands; statute of frauds, $ 4; executed
consideration. Alderson v. Maddison (Eng. Ex. D.), 419

Bantham v. Wilson (Eng. Ch. D.).............. ...... 352
11.--Void by public policy ; release without considera-

COVENANT. By tenant to pay taxes and assess
tion to influence voters. Harvey v. Tama County

ments. Budd v. Marshall (Eng. C. P. D.)........... 158
(Iowa S. C.). ....

18

See Ancient Lights; Lease.
12. -Void as against public policy. Williamson v. Chi.,
R. I. & P. Ry. Co. (Iowa S. C.)......

CRIMINAL CONVERSATION. Action for, not
....... .........

dependent on wife's consent; evidence; husband
13.--Void as against public policy; constructive posses-

and wife not competent to prove want of sexual
sion dependent on. Clements v. Yturria (N. Y. App.) 155

intercourse; presumption of legitimacy of child
14.-Between railroad and telegraph company to send
private messages free of charge, against public

born aster. Egbert v. Greenwalt (Mich. s. C.).. .... 376
policy and immoral. Western Un. Tel. Co. v. U. P. CRIMINAL LAW. Abortion by administering a
R. R. Co. (U. S. C. C., Kans.)..........

.. 143 drug; name of drug need not be stated in indict-
15.-In restraint of trade; foreign judginent. Rouissil-

ment; woman on whom committed not accomplice.
lon v. Rouissillon (Eng. Ch. D.)....

Watson v. State (Tex. App.) .....

.: ....... 318
16.-Wagering, what is; sale of merchandise for future

2.- Appeal, escaped criminal may not maintain, from
delivery. Marx v. Ellsworth (Tex. Comin. App.).... 19 conviction. People v. Redinger (Cal. S. C).........
See Action ; Attorney; Consideration ; Constitutional

3.- Assault and manslaughter; constitutional law;
Law; Corporations ; Eviction; Firtures; Husband

former conviction. State of Maine v. Littlefield
and Wife; Insurance, Fire: Lunatic; Maritime Law;

(M e . S. C )..................... ........................ 318
Marriage; Married Woman : Sule; Statute of Frauds;

4.- Attempt, solicitation to another to commit crime,
Tclephone; Trade; Usury: Will.

not. Stablier v. Comm. (Penn. S. C.)....

5.-Attempt to steal, indictment need not specify
CONVERSION. Of buildings belonging to another

articles. State v. Utley (N. C. S. C.).......
by land-owner, when_buildings personal property. 6.-Bigamy; presumption of death from absence. Hull
Doliver v. Ela (Mass. S. C.)...

y. Texas (Tex, App.) ......
2.-Laches; action will not lie where property changed

7.- Confession not proof of corpus delicti. Priest v.
to real estate. Detroit & B. C. R. R. Co. v. Burch

State (Neb. S. C.). ................... .......
(Mich. S. C.)........

......
............ 198

8.- Conspiracy; to make liable, party must consent to
3.- When demand before action for, not necessary.

criminal act; no implied assent; unlawful act not
Harpending v. Myers (Cal. S. C.).............

of dangerous character. Lamb v. People (III. S. C.). 418
See Bailment.

9.-Constitutional law; right of trial by jury in vicinage.

Swart v. Kimball (Mich. S. C.) .......
CONVEYANCE. Fraudulent; conveyance in con-

).- Counsel, right of public prosecutor to be assisted
sideration of marriage not voluntary. National

by: evidence ; testimony of deceased witness admis-
Exchange Bank v. Watson (R. I, S. C.). ..........

sible. State v. Wilson (Kans. S. C.) .....
2.-Fraudulent; when voluntary conveyance to child,

11.- Cumulative sentences, power of court to pass.
not presumption of acceptance of deed. Herring v.

Castro v. Queen (Eng. App.).........
Richards (U. S. C. C., Minn)....

12.- Evidence; conversations accompanying acts proved
3.-Fraudulent; settlement by husband on wife: what

admissible. Macky. State (Wis. S. C.).....
does not constitute fraud. Carr v. Breese (N. Y.

13.- Evidence; dying declarations; hope of recovery
A
App.).
pp.)............ ................ .......... .. ..... 037

renders incompetent. People v. Hodgdon (Cal.
4.-Fraudulent; innocent vendee from one fraudu-

S. C.) ......... ..... ................... ........... 15
lently selling, protected. Beurman v. Van Buren
(Mich. S. C.)........................................

14.- Evidence ; intoxication may be shown in order to

determine degree of crime. Willis v. Commissioner
COPYRIGHT Chromo printed Berlin woolwork

(Va. S. C.) ..............

::::::
in

176
pattern not a piratical copy of an engraving from

15.- Evidence; larceny; charge to jury; expressing opin-
the same design. Dicks v. Brooks (Eng. App.).....

ion as to guilt. Tenze v. People (N. Y. App.) ...... 433
2.-In article in encyclopedia. foreign and native 16.— False pretenses ; evidence; intent; proof of other
owners: injunction when will not issue. Scribner

acts of like character, when admissible. Trogden y.
v. Stoddart (U. S. C. C., Penn.)............

Commissioners (Va. S. C.) ........................... 138
3.-Foreign publication, sale of chromo designed from

17.- False pretenses; one falsly representing himself to
picture in: when does not constitute a breach.

be a " store-keeper" and obtaining goods is guilty
Johnson v. Donaldson (
U S, C. C., N. Y.)........... 1431 of. Higler v. People (Mich. S. C.)......

........ 344

3

.... 212

413

......

4

....

75

.......

PAGE. | HUSBAND AND WIFE - Continued

PAGE.
EXECUTION. Officer's return on, conclusive until 17.-Liability of husband for repairs on wife's house.
directly impeached. Barrows V. National Rubber

Ross V. Janes (Buff. S. C.)......
Co. (R. 1. S. C.)............ .. ... ....... ..... ......

8.- Valid mortgage by wife rendered invalid by forgery
EXEMPTION. Attachment ; sewing-inachines and

of note it was given to secure; jurisdiction. Mers-
piano are "household furniture, and exempt from.

man v. Werges (U. S. C. C., Iowal....

....... 316
Van Storck v. Winslow (R. I. S. C.) .....

202 | 9.-Replevin does not lie between. Hobbs v. Hobbs (Me.
2.- Execution ; unfinished burial cases; debtor's right

S. C.)..... ............. .. .
to exemption not waived by neglect to claim it. Mc-

See Contract; Conveyance; Criminal Conversation;
Abe v. Thompson (Minn. S. C.) ......................

Criminal Law: Married Woman: Mechanics Lien :

Recording Acts; Set-off.
EXPERT. See Evidence.
EXTRADITION. Detention of extradited pris.
oner under civil process; "offense," what is, within

ICE. See Negligence.
meaning of act; contempt. Pooley v. Whetham INDIANA. See Constitutional Amendments.
(Eng. App.).....

INDICTMENT. See Criminal Law
2.- Inter-State; duty of executive of whom fugitive is
demanded. State of North Carolina v. Perry (D.C.

INFANT. See Guardianship: Marriage; Married
S. C.)......... ........... ............ ................

Woman; Parent and Child ; Pleading.

INFANTICIDE. See Criminal Law.
FALSE PRETENSES. See Criminal Law.

INJUNCTION. May be issued in one equitable action
FELONY. See Criminal Law.

to restrain another iu same court. Mann v. Flower
FIDUCIARY DEBT. See Bankruptcy.

(Minn. S. C).....
FISHERIES. See Constitutional Law.

2.–Of publication injurious to trade ; jurisdiction.

Croft v. Richardson (N. Y. S. C.).
FIXTURES. Erected by one in possession under

-Publication injurious to trade; not necessary to
contract of purchase. "Hinkley & E. Iron Co. v.

prove actual damage in an action to restrain.
Black (Me. S. C.) .........

Thomas v. Williams (Eng. Ch. D).................... 419
2.When machinery in factory is, as between yendor

4.- Publication and circulation of a li

atent laws.
and vendee. Shelton v. Ficklin (Va. S. C.) ............

Bell v. Singer Mfg. Co. (Ga. S. C.)....

... 436
See Real Estate.

5.-Street railroad, preliminary injunction to prevent,
FORECLOSURE. Defendant cannot set up para-

from running cars on rails made, without having
mount title. Yerks v. Roots (Buff. S. C.).....

compensated owners of the fee, etc. Buffalo City
2.-Rights of mortgagees as to sale of parcels. Bern-

Cemetery v. Buffalo E. S. S. R. Co. (Buff. S. C.)..... 156
hardt v. Lymburner (Bull. S. C.)......

See Practice.
See Corporations; Former Adjudication.

INSANITY. Of widow excuses laches in dissenting
FOREIGN JUDGMENT. See Contract.

from husband's will. Wright v. West (Tenn. S. C.).. 123

See Evidence.
FORGERY. See Criminal Lau.

INSOLVENCY. Rights of creditor secured by lien.
FORMER ADJUDICATION. Action by pledgee

Petition of Knowles (R. I. S. C.)...

... 317
of mortgage to foreclose ; payment of judgment by

See Partnership.
owner of mortgage restores his right to foreclose.
Dougherty v. Remington Paper Co. (N. Y. App.)..... 273

INSURANCE, FIRE. Action by insurer against
2.-What does and what does not constitute; estoppel.

one negligently causing fire; joinder of parties.
Radford y Folsom (U. S. D. C., Mich.)............... 295

Swarthout v. Chicago & N. W. R. R. CN. (Wis. S. C.), 256

2. Contract between insured and mutual company may
FRANCHISE. What is ; right of railroad company

be cancelled and note surrendered by agreement of
to lay track through city; right need not be exclu-

parties. Acker, Rec'r, v. Hite (Penn. S. C.)...
sive, but must be from sovereign power. Chicago &

3. - Policy a contract of indemnity only. Darrell v.
W. Ind. R. R. Co. v. Dunbar (III. S. C). ...........

Tibbetts (Eng. App.)...........
2.- Does not include immunity from taxation; rail-

pp.)................................... 257

4-Agent, authority of; non-payment of premium;
road. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. Co. v. Hamblin

waiver. Critchett v. American Ins. Co. (Iowa 8. C), 137
Co. (U.S. C.)........................... ............... 516 5.-Concealment; stipulation against; fraud; articles
FRAUD. “Catching bargains : loaning of money on

not concealed and actually destroyed, company
expectation." Nevill v. Snelling Eng. Ch. D).....

liable for Austrian case. ..

................. 02
See Attorney ; Conveyance; Negotiable Instruments.

6.-Insurance of goods sold but not delivered; insur-

ance for another's benefit. Reitenbach v. Johnson
GAMBLING Statutory construction ; poker not

(Mass. S. C.).......................................... 375

7.-Dower, inchoate right of, not an incumbrance
game like faro, keno, etc. Nuckolls v. Comm. (Va.

avoiding policy. Southern Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kloeber
S. C. .............. ... ............... . ..............

(Va. S. C.)......
GIFT. Causa mortis ; of check ; of bills of exchange.

8.-Conditions as to incumbrances; waiver by examin-
Re Mead Austin v. Mead (Eng. Ch. D)........

ation of insured. Titus v. Glen's Falls Ins. Co. (N.Y.
2. Of notes to take effect at death of donor. Merri.

A p p .) ... ......... ...... ........... ... ....... .... 173
wether v. Morrison (Ky. App.)........................4

-Ownership of money for insurance as between ven.
See Will.

dor and purchaser. Rayner v. Preston (Eng. Ch. D.) 339
GUARANTY. Conditional; necessity of notice of 10.-" Riot," what constitutes. Lycoming Ins. Co. v.
acceptance; when not transferable. King v. Batter-

Schwenk (Penn S. C.).....

................... 403
son (R. I. S. C.)..........

........... 203.11.-Loss after premium paid, but before issue of policy;
GUARDIANSHIP. Court must have jurisdiction ;

equity may enforce payment; misrepresentation;
what does not constitute jurisdiction ; infant sur-

title : notice of loss. Woody v. Old Dominion Ins.
reptitiously brought into State. In the Matter of

Co. (Va, S. 1.) ....
Guardianship of llubbard Infants (N. Y. App.) ... 315 | 12.-Total loss, what is. Williams v. Hartford F. Ins. Co.

(Cal. S. C.).............

....... 256
GRAND JURY. Statutory construction: irregular-

13.- Payable to mortgagee; not defeated by mortgagor's
ity in drawing juror does not vitiate acts of jury.

subsequent act. Black v. Nat'lns Co. (L. Can).... 123
United States v. Ambrose (U.S. C. C., Ohio)....... 318

14.--Over valuation without wrongful intent, in proof
See Criminal Law,

of loss, does not avoid policy. Dogge v. Northwest-

ern Nat. Ins. Co. (Wis. S. C.).........
HIGHWAY. Alley in city not. Bagley v. People 15.-Vacancy of dwelling, temporary absence of family
(Mich. S. C.).....

not. Stupetzki v. Transatlantic F. Ins. Co. (Mich.
2.-Dedication to use for specified persons not dedica-
tion to public. Talbott v. Richmond & D. R. R. Co.

i.......... 256

16.-Vacancy, condition against; school-house; vaca-
(V a. S. C.)........... ......... . ........... .... .....

tion. American Ins. Co. v. Foster (Ill. S. C.)........ 164
HOMESTEAD. May be in building upon leased 17.-Waiver of condition; what is not. Farmers' F.
ground; use of part of premises for business pur-

Ins. Co. v. Mispelhorn (Md. App.).................. 118
poses. Hogan v. Manners (Kans. S. C.)..............

18.- Warranty, breach of, not defense in action on;
HUSBAND AND WIFE. Action of assumpsit not

compromise of loss; misrepresentations as to owner-
maintainable between. Hobbs v. Hobbs (Me. S. C.),

ship. Stache v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. (Wis. S. C.) 37
2.- Contract by wife before marriage: non-responsibil INSURANCE, LIFE. Accident ; death by drown-
ity of husband. Biery v. Ziegler (Penn. S. C.). ...... 398

ing induced by epileptic fit. Winspear v. Accident
3.-Clothing furnished by husband does not become

Ins. Co. (Eng. Ex. D.) .......
separate estate. Pratt v. State (Ohio S. C.).....

2. For benefit of child; construed to include grand-
4.-Conveyance of land to them makes them tenants in

child ; stipulation in policy contravening charter of
entirety. Marburg v. Cole (Md. App.)....

company ; life policy construed like a will. Duvall
5.-Authority to pledge credit during cohabitation;

v. Goodson (Ky. App.) .......................... 479
necessaries; revocation of implied authority. Deben.

--Domicile of insurance company from another State
ham v. Mellor (Eng. App.)..........

complying with State laws as to business. Cowardin
6.-That a wife living with her husband is authorized

v. Universal Life Ins. Co (Va. S. C.)...

...... 37
to pledge his credit for articles suitable to her

Taxation

...... 118

ces; waiver h

S. C.)...........

......... 223

136

..... 357

.... 316

....

.......

115

INSURANCE LIFE-Continued.
PAGE.

PAGE
5. – Forfeitures by failure to pay premium when due; LIEN. See Attorney: Carrier of Goods ; Debtor and
reluctance of courts to enforce forfeitures. Sea-

Creditor ; Insolvency; Maritime Law.
mane v, North W. Mutual Life Ins. Co. (U. S. C. C.,

LIMITATIONS. See Statute of Limitations.
M inn.) .... ... ............... ........... ... .. ......
6.- Insolvent company; non-payment of premiums. LOTTERY. See Constitutional Law.

Matter of Attorney-General v. Guardian Mutual Life LUNATIC. Deed of, when avoided; ratification;
Ins. Co. (N. Y. App.) .....

when contract held valid Crawford v. Scovell
7.-Insolvent company; right of receiver to appear in

(Penn. 3. C.). ...:
proceedings to determine priorities; constitutional

See Deed; Suitutory Construction.
law; obligation of contract; registered policies ;
annuities; computation of value; forfeitures ; un-

MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. Ground of; what
conscionable agreement; usury. Matter of Attor-
ney-General v. N. A. L. Ins. Co. (N. Y. App.) ...... 394

must be shown; failure of prosecution. Thaule v.

Krekeler (N. Y. App.). ............................ 114
8.- Non-payment of premium invalidating policy. Gid-
dings y. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. (U.

MANDAMUS. Will not lie against executive of State.
S. C.).....

Western R. R. Co. v. DeGrail (Minn. S. C.)..
9.- Vested interest of beneficiary in policy. Ricker v. 2.-Will lie against town board of audit to compel spe-
Charter Oak Life Ins. Co. (Minn. S. C.).............. 419

cific examination of claim. People ex rel. Thurston
See Benevolent Societies.

v. Board of Town Auditors (N. Y. App.) ... ........ 273

See Religious Society.
INSURANCE, MARINE. Unseaworthy ship; what

MANSLAUGHTER. See Criminal Law.
constitutes. Lawton v. Royal Canadian Ins. Co.
· (W is. S. C.)...

MAILS. Obstructing passage of; railroad train wrong.
*** See statutes of Frauds.****

fully passing over defendants' land: statutory con-

struction. United States v. De Mott (Com. Ct.,
INTENT. Criminal Law.

N. J.)....... ....... ......

............. 263
INTEREST. On mortgage after due not at contract

MARINE INSURANCE. See Insurance, Marine.
but at usual rate. Goodchap v. Roberts (Eng. App.). 218
2.-- When at contract rate after due, Union last. for

MARITIME LAW. Contract for repair of vessel:
Sav, v. Boston (Mass. S. C.)............................ 353

adiniralty jurisdiction. Town of Pelham v. Schooner
See Notice ; Usury.

(U. S. D. C.. N. Y.)......

2.- Bill of lading; for what goods owners of vessels re-
INTERLINEATION. See Alteration.

sponsible; authority of master; nature of instru-
INTOXICATION. See Criminal Law.

ment; contradicting by parol. Witzler v. Collins

(Me S. C.).........
JOINDER. In actions for tort ; release of one party

3.-Bottomry bond; collision; order of liens. Forcev.

Pride of the Ocean (U. S. D. C., N. Y) .........
when not release of others. Ellis v. Essau (Wis.

4.- Carrier of goods; stoppage in transitu. Ex partc Fa
S. C.). ............::::

Re Keill (Eng. App.).......
2.- Judgment in joint action for tort not divisible.

5.-Charter of mortgaged ship. The Fanchon (Eng. Pro.
McCool v. Mahoney (Cal. S. C.). ...,

& Adm. D.).......
See Criminal Law ; Insurance, Fire.

6.--Contract to furnish sails to vessels building; fur.
JUDGMENT. Founded upon illegal contract, va-

pished after launching, a land contract and lien
cating of Bredier y. Dorsey (Penn. S. C.).....

under State law valid. Wilson v. Lawrence (N. Y.
2.- Of justice's court; cost beyond statutory limit

A pp ).. . . .... ................... ....... ........... 413
vitiates. Kunz y. Ech hert (Bufl. S. C.).......

7.-Duty of ship-owner to return mariner to port of ship-
3.- Or justice of'the peace cannot be upheld by mere in-

ment. Worth v. Steamboat (U. S. D. C., Mo.)...... 494
tendment. Chappell v. Truscott (Buff. S. C.)....... 8.-General average, subject of. Atwood v. Sellar (Eng.
See Conflict of Laws; Criminal Law; Joinder ; Ju-

App.)......

.................... ........ ....
risdiction; Practice.

9.-Jurisdiction of admiralty as to crew of foreign ves-

sel. Amalia, The (U. S. D. C., Me.) ............... 198
JURISDICTION. Admiralty; collisions on Ohio

10.-Liability for loss of cargo; deviation from course to
river; Federal question. Schoonmaker v. Gilmore
(U. S.S. C.)

save property. Scaramanga v. Stamp (Eng. App.). 39
.......
2.-Circuit Courts, suit brought by assignee of munici-

11.-Rule in case of collision. Shepherd v. Clara (0.s.

S. C.)....
pal bond; acknowledgment of indebtedness. Porter

.......... . .

. Smith
v. Jonesville (U. S. C. C., Wis.)......................

12.-Sunday, seamen can be required to work on. Smith

v. Schooner (U. S. D. C., Peon.)...
3.-Federal court; suit founded on contract in favor of

See Jurisdiction; Sunday.
an assignee when Circuit Court has no jurisdiction.
Stanley v. Supervisors (U. S.C. C, N. Y.).... ...... 441

MARRIAGE. Action for breach of promise; con-
4.-of Federal courts over suits by States. New Orleans

sanguinity; nephew and aunt; conflict of law.
M. & T. R. R. Co. v. State (U. S. S. C.). ..... ........ 489

Campbell v. Crampton (U. S. C. C., N. Y.).....
5.-Of Federal courts not cnferable by consent of

2.- Breach of promise; infant; ratification or fresh
parties, removal of cause from State court depend-

promise. Ditchain v. Worrall (Eng. C. P. D.)........ 419
ent upon subject matter. People's Bank of Belle-

3.- Ante-nuptial settlement as against creditors; con-
ville v. Winslow (U.S.S. C.).........

sideration. Nat. Exchange Bank v. Watson (R. I.
6 -Foreign judgment on substituted service. Shepard

S. C.)........
v. Wright (N. Y. S. C.)............................. 302

4.- Contract of, before witnesses without ceremonial
7.-State courts have, of actions in personam for mari-

provided in statute, when no marriage. Common-
time torts. Brown v. Gilmore (Penn. S. C.)... ...... 338

wealth v. Munson (Mass. S. C.).. ..... ....
8.-Service of process ; railroad company of one State :

- Oral contract made before witnesses in foreign
leasing railroad in another, not citizen of latter

countries, and on ship crossing English channel ;
State. Brownell v. Troy & B. R. R. Co. (U.S.C. C.,

adıninistration and succession; confiict of law (N.
Vt.).....

.. 497
Y. App.)...........

..... 301
See' Conflict of Laws; Constitutional Law; Guard- "" | 6.- By divorced party in another State. Kerrison v. ...
ianship; Injunction ; Maritime Law; National Banks ;

Kerrison (N. Y. Spec. Term)......
Practice ; Waiver.

7.-Verba de futuro and cohabitation do not constitute.

Hebblethwaite v. Hepworth (III. S. C.)....
JUROR. Ignorance of English as affecting qualifica-

8.- Validity of foreign : proof of handwriting ; proof
tion of. Town of Trinidad v. Simpson (Colo. S. C.).. 409
See Criminal Law.

of foreign law ; presumptions; evidence. Hynes v.

McDermott (N. Y. App.) .........
JURY Must understand English. McCampbell v.

See Conveyance.
State (Tex. App ). ......
See Grand Jury.

MARRIED WOMAN.Debt of a married wo-

man, which she is not bound to pay, will prove a suffi-
JUSTICES' COURTS. Misjoinder of defendants.

cient consideration to support an obligation under
Haminer v. Knell (Buff. S. C.) ......

........... 97 seal, by a third person, to pay it. Leonard v. Duffin
See Judgment.

(Penn. S. C.) .....

2.-- Deed by: cannot be contradicted by parol. Ætna
JUSTICE OF PEACE. See Judgment.

Life Ins Co. v. Franks (Iowa S. C.).....

3.- Disaffirmance of contracts made by, when infant ;
LARCENY. See Criminal Law.

when need not be during coverture : estoppel ; in-

fant not bound by. Sims v. Everhardt (U. S. S. C.), 455
LEASE.. Covenant to pay taxes and assessments;

- Not liable for improvements to separate property
what is an assessment. Budd v. Marshall (Eng.

made on husband's credit. Holmes v. Bronson (Mich.
A pp.).... ...... ... . . .......... ... .. ... ... ... ...

S. C.).......
2 -Covenant as to use of premises – waiver by accept-

5.- Divested of title to real estate only in statutory
ing rent. Griffiu v. Tompkins (Eng. Q. B. D.) .....

mode ; estoppel. Innis v. Templeton (Penn. S. C.).
LEGACY. See Will.

363, 377
LEGITIMACY. See Conflict of Law ; Criminal Con-

6.- May be entitled to compensation for services per-

formed in husband's family. Mason v. Dunbar (Mich.
verration.

S. C.)..... .......... ........
LIBEL. See Slander ana Libel.

See Acknowledgment ; Criminal Law; Statute of Lim
LICENSE. See Excise ; Patent.

itations.

434

.... 301

............ 512

.....367

"... 103

....... 398

.......

. 117

...........

198