Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

..

[ocr errors]

3

.......... 2

......

.. 39

St National

special depois

......... 463

6._use National

Proof of us article Ale. 3.

PAGE. | MORTGAGE-Continued. .

PAGE.
MASTER AND SERVANT. Negligence ; con 8.--0f real estate; rent of premises, mortgagee not
tributory negligence by employee; what does not

entitled to Long v. Wade (Me, S. C.).....
constitute. Hawley v. North. Ceut. Ry. Co. (N. Y.

9.-Of cemetery lots invalid. Thompson V. H
App.) .......

433

(N. Y. S. C.) ... ........ ....... . .... ..............
2.- Negligence; one assisting servant at request of 10.- Mortgagee in possession must account for renta
master, not co-servant. Kelly v. Johnson (Mass.

value of premises. Barnett v. Nelson (Iowa S. C.), 198
S. C.)....... .......... .. ...... .... ... .... .. .

75 11.-Accompanying negotiablo note not liable to equities.
3.- Negligence; master liable for injury to servant from

Gabbert v. Schwartz (Ind., S. C.).....

......... 377
defective machinery through negligence of 00-ser-

See Foreclosure: Former Adjudication : Husband and
vant contributes. Cone v. Del. L. & W. R. R. Co.

Wife; Insurance, Fire; Interest; Receiver; Record;
(N. Y. App.)....

Recording Act; Specific Performance ; Usury.
4.- Negligence ; duty as to safe machinery; inspector

and brakeman not co-servants. Braun y. Chicago,

R. I. & P. R. R. Co. (Iowa S. C.)....................
5.-Negligence; defective machinery; contributory

NATIONAL BANKS. Construction of Federal
negligence of co-servant. McMahon v. Henning (U.

statute; State court has jurisdiction in action against
S. C.C., Kans.) ...............

bank in another State; attachment against property

of bank. Robinson v. National Bank (N. Y. App.), 15
- On what liability of master for injury to servant
depends; superintendent performing duty of opera-

2.-Jurisdiction of Federal courts. Foss v. First

National Bank (U. S. C.C., Col.)..................... 216
tive fellow-servant. Crispin v. Babbitt (N. Y. App.),

3.-Jurisdiction of State courts, as to offenses by offi-
394,

cers of. Commonwealth ex rel. Torrey v. Kettner
MECHANICS' LIEN. Right of mechanic to as-

(Penn. S. C.) 292; Luberg v. Commissioner (Penn.
sign. Pearsons V. Tincker (Me. S.C.) .......

423

S. C.) .......... ...... ... .. ........... ... ......... 293
2.- Inchoate right to, not assignable; assignment of

4.-When liable for frauds of officers. Steckel v. First
installment due on contract. Merchant v. Ottum-

National Bank (Penn, S. C.), 313; Zeigler v. First Na-
wa Water Power Co. (Iowa S. C.)....

tional Bank (Penn. S. C.), 314 : Resh y. First National
3.--Husband and wife; wife's land not subject to lien

Bank (Penn. S. C.)..................

.... .. ..... 314
for repairs without her authority or consent. Stein-

5.-When liable for special deposits. Pattison v. Syra-
man v. Henderson (Penn. S. C.)......

cuse National Bank (N. Y. App.)..................... 506
MERGER. Of mortgage securing note Dickerson

6.- Taxation of shares, remedy for illegal; Constitu-
v. Williamson (Mass. S. C.).........

375 tional Law. National Alban Exchange Bank V.

Hills (U. S. C. C., N, Y )......................... 441, 451
MINOR. Deed of land not appearing upon its face

to be prejudicial to him, not void but voidable. NEGLIGENCE. Bailment; a gratuitous bailee only
Davis v. Dudley (Me.)...................................

23 liable for gross negligence; question for jury. Car-

rington v. Ficklin's Executor (Va. S. C.). ...........
MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. Agent's lia-
MQT01AL.

CO
bility for trespass of

2.-Contributory, of parents; railroad company owes
.
Sprague v. Tripp (RI, S. C.).. 236
BSC 926

no duty of protection to children trespassing upon
2.-Bonds: issue in excess of constitutional limit of

its track. Cauley v. Pitts., Cin. & St. L. R. R. Co.
municipal liability; recital in bonds: bona fide

(Penn. S. C.)................................ .. .
holder; estoppel. Buchanan v. Litchfield (U. S.S. C.) 516 -Contributory, when a question for jury. Haskell
3.-Irregular exercise of power in issuing bonds does

v. New Gloucester (Me. S. C.) ..........

. ............. . ....... 135
not invalidate bonds; recitals in deed do not estab-

4.-Dangerous article; gas; contributory ; affirmative
lish deed. Singer Manuf. Co. v. Elizabeth (N.J.S. C.) 517 proof of want of. Smith v. Boston Gas-Light Co.
4.-Power of, in charter as to regulation of slaughter-

(Mass. S.C.).....
houses, included power of total prohibition within

5.-Firing cannon in public street, town not liable for
specified limits Cronin v. People (N. Y. App.). ...

negligence of officer in not preventing. Borough of
5.-Contempt, cannot be guilty of. Bass v. Shakopee

Morristown y. Fitzpatrick.........................
(Minn. S. C).........

6.-Ice, negligent breaking of crop by steamboat.
6.-Limit of duty as to high ways; evidence ; commu-

People's Ice Co. v. Excelsior (Mich. S. C.).......... 342
nication of patient to physician. Wilson v. Granby 7.-Objects liable to frighten horses ; turnpike com-

(Conn S. C.)....... ................................ 416 pany liable after notice. Eggleston v. Columbia
7.- Negligence; liability for contractors, in repair of

Turnpike Road (N. Y. App.)......................... 416
street. City of Logansport v Dick (Ind. S. C.). ... 183 8.-Omission to ring bell and keep flagman at street
8.-Negligence; liability for defective cross-walk ; bur-

crossing, if not contributing to injury from railroad
den of proof. Luedecke v. Buffalo (Buff. S. C.).... 97 train, not negligence. Pakalinskey v. N. Y. C. &
9.-Not liable for injury from defective approach to

H. R. R. R. Co. (N. Y. App.). ......
bridge not owned by it in its limits. Bishop v. Cen-

9.-Proximate cause; fire communicated by burning
tralia (Wis. S. C.).....

oil on stream. Kuhn v. Jewett (N. J. Ch.)..
10.-Ordinance excluding slaughter-houses from fixed 10.-Rennote cause; burning oil carried by stream. Kuhn
area in city; statutory construction; power to regii-

v. Jewett, Rec'r (N. J. Eq) .......................... 243
late includes power to prohibit; reason for statute

11.-Railroad company not liable for damages from
need not be set forth. Cronins v. People (N. Y.

sparks of engine leased to run on private road. Mar-
App).......... ........................... ..........

quette, etc., R. R. Co v. Spear (Mich. S. C.).......
11. Set-off in action against city; that preliminary steps 12.-Railroad engine sparks setting fire ; that fire occurs
must precede action does not preclude set-off ; claim

not evidence of negligence. Reading & C. R. R. Co.
against county not actionable subject of. Taylor v.

v. Latshaw (Penn. S. C.)......

....11
Mayor (N. Y. App.) .....

13.- Engine on railway near highway making noise with-
2.-Street railroad: permission to lay tracks not a fran-

out notice; question of fact. Hart v. Chicago, R. I.
chise but a license. Buffalo C. Ř'y Co. v. N. Y.C.

& P. Ry. Co. (Iowa S. C.) ................. ....... 436
R. R. Co. (Buff. S.C.)................................ 134 See Action ; Attorney: Bailment : Carrier of Passen-
13.-Exemption of cemeteries from taxation; assess-

Gers: Insurance, Fire: Master and Servant, Municipal
ments for local improvements. Olive Cemetery Co.

Corporations; New York City; Railroads, Water-
v. Philadelphia (Penn. S. C.)........ ............... 349 course.
4. Town; action for personal injuries sustained by
falling into a trench near a public building; when

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS. Unreason-
town or city is liable for defects. Larrabee v. Pea-

able delay to present bill discharges drawer. Allan
body (Mass. S. C.).....

v Eldred (Wig. S. C.).............

........ 378
15. - Town; liability of, for injuries caused by defects in 2.-Notice by mail of dishonor of bill. Forbes v.
public places; negligence. Clark v. Waltham (Mass.

Omaha Nat. Bank (Neb. S. C.).....

169

........ .........
S. C.) .............

3.-Payment or debt by certified check: loss of check;
16.-Village cannot embrace disconnected track of land.

payment on forged indorsement; rights and liabilia
Smith v. Sherry (Wis. S. C.)...

ties of parties. Thompson v. Bank of British N. A.
See Bonds ; Constitutional Law ; Eminent Domain;

(N. Y. App).... ..
New York City ; Patent.

4.-Promissory note, what is stipulated in; notice.

Parkery. Plymall (Kans S.C.)..
MORTGAGE, Chattel. Power of mortgagee to pos-

5.-Promissory note; immaterial alteration adding
session when he feels insecure, not arbitrary. Roy

*annually" to "interest." Leonard v. Phillips
V. Goings (nl. 3. C.). ...

........ . ...
.. ......... 504

(Mich. S. C.)........

. ..
2.-Chattel; rights of joint mortgagees. Hanrahan v. 6.–Promissory note; words "bearer" or "order" not
Roche (Bull. S. C.).....

essential to negotiability of. Porter v.Jonesville (U.
3.-Chattels, on merchandise with privilege to sell; deed

S.C. C., W is.)............ ... ... .. ....

. ..... 435
of trust. Scott y. Alfred (Tex S. C.).....

7.-- Defense that maker was induced to sign by frand,
4.-Chattel, of subsequently acquired personal prop-

when unavailable. Fayette Co. Sav. Bank v. Stefles
erty Lazarus v. Andrade (Eng. C. P. D.) ......... 293

(Iowa S. C.)........

.... ............. ..... 317
5. Of goods to be inanufactured when valid in equity.

8.- Presentment and notice by a disqualified notary ;
First National Bank of Alexandria v. Turnbull (Va.

evidence; protest of promissory note unnecessary.
Falk v. Leo i Penn. S. C.)....

157

...............
6.-Or merchandise, when not fraudulent, Hastings v. 9.- Holder for value, creditor surrenderiny note of
Parke (Bull. S. C.). ..

debtor is, but not if surrendering dishonored check;
7.-Real estate; change of form of indebtedness does

conflict of law. Phenix Ias. Co. v. Church (N. Y.
pot discharge. Heirly v. Mattisou (lowa S. C.).....

App.) ........................................

...... 17

.............. 354

83

..........

[ocr errors]

134

96

[ocr errors]

App.) ....

Partneri :... 378

....... 297

validity of 18. S. C.)..

, (Minn S

[ocr errors]

C.)....................................

..............

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS-Cont'd. PAGE. PLEADING- Continued.

PAGE.
10.-- Holder for value; bar to action ; estoppel; conflict 12.-Amended answer; when may be disregarded; sham
of law. Brooklyn C. & N. R. R. Co. v. Nat'l Bank (U.

and frivolous. Becker v. Weisner (Buff. S. C.)....... 156
S.S. C.)........ ......:

. . .............. 189

3.- Esidence; allegation of libel published after suit
11.- Holder for value ; liability of indorser to, when
identity of maker falsely represented by payee.

brought, irrelevant, etc, Storck v. Buffalo German

R. P. Asso. (Buff. S. C.)...
Monnen v. Conner (Butr. S. C.)...

4.- Executor de son tort, declaration against. Sawyer v.
12. — Transfor in payment of antecedent debt shuts out

Thayer (Me S. C.).....
equities. Bluin v. Loggins (Tex. S. C.).....

5.- Infancy; evidence not objected to Cutler v. Getz
13.- Receiver's certificate not. Turner v. Peoria & S. R.
R. Co. (Ill. S. C.) ..........

(Buff. S.C.)....

............... 97

See Criminal Law; Tender.**
See Banks and Banking; Mortgage; Partnership;
Pleading; Usury.

PLEDGE. See Title.
NEWSPAPERLaw Weekly not. Beecher v. Stey.

POSTMASTER. Not "officer of revenue," statu-
eus Minn. S. C.) .......

tory construction ; certificate of probable cause.

Campbell y. James (U. S. C. C., N. Y.)..............
NEW YORK CITY. Removal of officer must be

for cause; sipervising engineer not answerable for PRACTICE. Appeal to Court of Appeals ; order dis-
negligence of subordinates; review of removal. Peo-

charging arrest ; opinion of court below cannot
ple ex rel. Campbell v. Campbell (N. Y. App.)........ 33

control order. In re Nebenzahl (V, Y. App.) . 114
NOTICE. When notice of mortgage to soliciter not

-Time when judge must sign exception; writ of
notice to client; equitable interest. Tavo v. Cave

error before exceptions signed no waiver; date of
(Eng. Ch. D.)...

signature; evidence; proof of boundary lines by
See Recording Acts; Suretyship.

reputation ; adverse possession; true owner in pos-

session of part of lot. Hunnicut v. Peyton (U. S.
NUISANCE. Obstructing highway, when private

S. C.) ..............
action lies for. Shepherd v. Barnett (Tex. S. C.)... 19 3.-Injunction, notice of, by telegraph. Tonkinson v.
Seo Statutory Construction,

Cartledge (Eng.) ....
| 4.-Imperfect service of copy, when suficient. Osgoodby

v. Seifert (Bull. S. C.)..............................
OFFICE AND OFFICER. Eligibility; removal of 5.-Jurisdiction of court over orders made at same
disabilities after election and before entering on du-

term ; appeal. Phillips v. Ord way (U. S. S. C.)...
ties. State v. Trumpf (Wis. S. C.)........

6.- Entry of judgment; filing memorandum by judge
2.- De facto, validity of acts of. Carli V. Rhener

not sufficient. Knapp, Rec., v. Roche (N. Y. App.), 454
(M inn S. C ) . . .. ... . ..... .....................

7.- Rehearing after judgment; when petition should
3.- When official term commences; statutory construc-

be filed. Brooks v. Burlington & S. Ry. Co. (U.S.
tion. Ball v. Kenfield, controller (Cal. S. C.)........
See Attachment: Constitutional Law Corporations ;

Order for publication under old Code, $ 135; what
Postmaster.

sufficient to authorize. Belmont v. Coenen (N. Y.

App ).........::
PARENT AND CHILD. Infant, custody of ; sup.

............. ..... 510

..

winion: when opinion n

9.-- Order not modified by opinion; when opinion may
posed welfare of children, the parents being on an

be referred to for explanation: discretion of court
equality. English v. English (N. J. Eq.)............

governed by rule : granting leave to plead after
2- Custody of infant; conflicting rights. Common-

judgment on demurrer. Fisher v. Gould (N. Y.
wealth ex rel. Drummond v. Ashton (Phila. Qr.

App.) ................:
Sess.)...

10.-Statutory construction : "extraordinary motion or
3.--Step-child; when step-father stands in loco pa-

case." Cox v Hillyer (Ga. S. C.)....
rentis. Smith v. Rogers (Kans. S. C.)...

11.- Vacating order of arrest ; reference; entry of

order. Stafford v. Amiles (Buff S. C.). .

12.- Writ used and filed may not be used in new pro-
PARTIES. To suit to determine validity of will, per-

ceeding. In re Marson (Me. S. C.)......
sons not in esse. McArthur v. Allen (U. S. C. C.,

See Executor ; Criminal Law; Tender.
Ohio) .......
PARTITION. Seo Trust.

PRESCRIPTION. See Easement.
PARTNERSHIP Agreement between partner and PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. See Slan-
third person; sub-partnership; sub-partner not

der (ind libel.
liable as partner. Burnett v. Snyder (N. Y. App.)... 337

PROCESS. Not protection to party, but only to offi-
2.- Dissolution; when party dealing with firm bound

cer Barr v. Boyles (Penn. S. C.)......
by agreement of dissolution; vesting one partner

............ 519
with control of liquidation, factor. Hilton y. Van-

PROMISSORY NOTE. See Negotiable Instru-
derbilt (N. Y. App.) ...............................

515

ments.
3.-Dormant and ostensible partner : bill of exchange; PROTEST. See Negotiable Instruments.

firm in name of single member. Yorkshire Bkg, Co. PROXIMATE AND REMOTE CAUSE. See
v. Beatson (Eng. App.). .....

Negligence.
4.-Expulsion of member: Common Law Procedure
Act, 1851, 811; arbitration clause; order of reference.

PUBLIC CHARITY, Sectarian institutions; word
Russell v. Russell (Eng. Ch.D.).....

"pure'y." Burd Orphan Asylum V. School Dist

................. 19
5.- Partners signing notes in individual names; when

(Pend. S C .)...................... ................... 64
creditor may eiect between firm and individual liabil. PUBLIC POLICY. Money paid by third person to
ity; insolvency. First Nat. Bank of Portland; In

creditor to induce him to join in coinpromise, not
re Thompson (Me. S. C.).....

...... ... ........ 13

recoverable back. Solinger y Earle (V. Y. App.).... 474
6.-Joint and several note given by partners; when

2.-Compounding crime ; agreement not to prosecute
creditor may hold both firm and individual partners:

misdemeanor; right to return of securities deposited.
insolvency. Ec parte Nason ; In re Thompson (Me. S.

Whitmore v. Farley (Eng. Ch. D.)......
C ) .....

PUBLIC RECORDS. A person has no common-
7.-When joint enterprise is not. Boston & C. S. Co.

law right to a copy or abstract of entire records in
v. Smith (R. I. S. C.).......

which he has no special interest. Webber v. Town-
8 -Statute of limitations, power of one partner to take

ley (Mich. S. C.)................................... 44,
debt out of, by payment. Goodwin v. Parton (Eng.

App.). ...... .:
See Bankruptcy; Banks and Banking; Voluntary RAILROADS. Action lies to compel construction
Association.

of farm crossing. Jones v. Seligman, Trustee (V. Y.

A pp.), ....... .... ....... .... ....... ..... ...
PASSENGER Mail agent on railroad. Price v.

... 180

2.- Construction of statute relating to fences : owner
Penn. R. R. Co .....
• Co ..... .... ......... ............... ..

.. 391

of leased road liable for cattle killed by failure to
PATENT. License, breach of covenant does not for-

fence. Fontain v. Southern P. R. R, Co. (Cal. S. C.), 57
feit. White y. Lee (
U S. C. C., Mass.) .............. 295

3.--Removal of snow by street railway company; when
2.-Invention in form of a book; municipal corpora-

company not liable for injury to adjoining property.
tion liable for infringement. Munson v. Mayor

Short v. Balt. City Pass, Ry. Co. (Md. App.). ......
(U. S. C. C., N. Y.)

.... .... ... 295

See Carrier of Passengers: Constitutional Larr: Emi-
3.-Reissue by commissioners must be for same inven-

ment Domain ; Franchise ; Injunction, Jurisdiction,
tion. Ball v. Langles (U.S. S. C.)....

. ....... ... 476

Municipal Corporations; Negligence.
4.-Right of patentee to threaten legal proceedings
against purchasers from other manufacturers; when

RATIFICATION. See Constitutional Amendments.
such notice restrained. Halsey y. Brotherhood (Eug.

REAL ESTATE. Building erected by license on
Ch. D.)........
See Injunction.

highway; right of way not. Walton v. Wray (lowa
PERJURY. See Criminal Law.

2.- Fixtures treated as personalty by all parties, not;
PERSONAL PROPERTY. See Conversion ; Sale.

estoppel. Smith v. Waggoner (Wis, S. C.) ... .... 331
PLEADING. Action upon promissory note. Allis v. RECEIVER. Actions against : jury trial. Kennedy
Leonard (N. Y. App.)...

... 28 v. Indianapolis & L. F. R. R. Co. (U.S. C. C., Ohio), 916

......

158

S.

C.)........

[ocr errors]

..............

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.......

[ocr errors]

S.C.)....

I (N. Y. Apoint not provable of plaintiff ün:

IUCU

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

...........................

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.......... 217

R

ishaw (Kaus. 3.0..............

197

RECEIVER- Continued.
PAGE. SEDUCTION. See Evidence.

PAGE
2.-Of corporation ; estate in hands of, liable upon cov SET-OFF In action by husband and wife; debt owed
enant of corporation to pay rent. People v. Nat'

by one only. Bentz v. Bentz (Penn. S. C.)..
Trust Co. (N. Y. App.).....

........ .... 155

See Municipal Corporations; Statute of Limitations.
3.-Takes subject to claim of lienholder not party.
Snowy Winslow (Iowa S. C.)....

SLANDER AND LIBEL. An attorney, who is

...... ...... 254
4.-Where mortgage conditioned that mortgagee may

also an editor of a newspaper, cannot be summarily
take possession upon default, receiver may be ap-

disbarred on account of his publishing in his newg.
pointed if default occurs. Sacramento & P. R. R.

paper a libel on a judge, not designed to acquire an
Co. v. Superior Court (Cal. S. C.)......

intiuence over him in the exercise of his judicial

functions through the instrumentality of popular
RECEIVER OF STOLEN GOODS. See Crim-

prejudice. In the Matter of the Rules disbarring
inai Law.

Steinman aad Hensel, attorneys (Penn. S. C.)....... 311

2.-Damages recoverable only for the slanderous words
RECORD. Mistake of register in recording does not

charged; evidence of repetition of words admissible
prejudice mortgagee. Sinclair V. Slawson (Mich.

to show malice Ward v Dick (Conn. S. C.) ......
....... ........ ........... .......

3.-Mitigation of damages ; reputation of plaintiff un-
RECORDING ACT. Assignment of mortgago;

known to defendant not provable. Hatfield V.
unauthorized discharge by assignor after assign-

Lasher (N. Y. App.)............... ...... ... ....
ment; contents of assignment and record; estoppel;

4.- Privileged communication ; criticism of conduct of
silence of assignee after unauthorized discharge.

public officer. Hamilton v. Eno (N. Y. App.)....... 196
Bryan v. Judson (N. Y. App.).....

5. - Privileged communication; indorsement written
2.-Notice: husband and wife ; purchase by debtor of

by paval officer on resignation of plaintiff. Maurice
surety's land under mortgage sale. Hassey y. Wilke,

v. Worden (Md. App.)....
(Cal. S C .)..... ........

See Injunction.
....... .................. ... 417
REGISTRATION. See Elections.

SLAUGHTER-HOUSE. See Ensements; Munici-

pal Corporations.
RELIGIOUS SOCIETIES. Mandamus does not
lie to compel restoration to membership. State ex

SPEC. 'IC PERFORMANCE. Mortgage, agree-
rel. Soares v. Hebrew Congregation (La. S. C.). ..... 483

ment to purchase subject to), not agreement to

assume. Lewis v. Day (lowa S. C.).................
REMOVAL OF CAUSE. Act of Congress relat-

18

See Action.
ing to, from State to Federal courts, does not pro-
vide for removal of criminal action on the ground of

STATUTE OF FRAUDS. Contract invalid by:
alienage. State of New Hampshire v. Grand Trunk

can only be avoided by parties to, marine insurance:
R. R. Co. (U. S. C. C., N H )......

insurable interest. Amsink v. American Ins. Co.
2, -Under acts of 1866 and 1867; what is final trial or

(Mass S. C.).... ...

................... ....... 2206
hearing. Jifkins v. Sweetser (U.S. S. C.).......... 516

2.-Conveyance of realty with rents reserved: implied
3.-Counter-claim establishing amount in disputo.

contract. Providence Christian Union v. Elliott (R.
Clarkson . Manson (U. S. 0. C., N. Y)...

I. S. C.). ................

. ............ 274
4.-Mistrial not tfial to prevent removal; amount. Bray-

3.- Defense under, personal. Rickards v. Cunningham
ley y. Hedges (Iowa S. C.)........

(Neb. S. C.). .......
5.-The amount in a petition for, to Federal court, as to

4.-Sale of real estate; price to be fixed by arbitration;
citizenship of the parties cannot be controverted.

notice of arbitration, when unnecessary. Morton v.
Dickey y. Robbins (Bull. S C.)....

Gale (III. S. C.).....

15

' *:.........
6.-When cause removal on account of distinction in

See Contract.
color. Fitzgerald v. Allman (V. C.S. C.) ......... 218 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. Acknowledge
See Criminal Law; Jurisdiction.

ment of debt to person other than creditor. Din-
RES ADJUDICATA. What constitutes. Star v.

guid v. Schoolfield (Va. S. C).................... 176
-Action against indorser of forged paper by drawee.

Merchants' Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. First Nat.
REWARD. Voluntary surrender of wrong-doer:

Bank (U. S. C. C., Md.).....
party bringing about entitled to. Austrian Case...

3.-Begins to run on check at time of making if drawer
REPLEVIN. In Stato court of goods seized under

has no funds with drawee. Brush y. Barrett (N. Y.
Federal process. Heyman v. Covell (Mich. S. C.)... 392 A pp.) ... ....................... .... ...... ..... 475
See Husband and Wife.

4.-Ceases to run against a set-off from the date of the

commencement of the action in which it is pleaded.
RIGHT OF WAY. Over granted land surrounded

McEwing y. James (Ohio S. C.).........
by land of grantor, when not aliowable. Mayor V.

5.-- Married woman, under old Code as to statutory con-
Riggs (Eng.).....

struction; old Code, 8 101 ; new Code, 88 381, 414; Laws
See Easement; Real Estate.

1870, chap. 741; 1851, chap. 479; payment. Acker v.
RIOT. See Insurance, Fire,

Acker (N. Y. App.) .......... ........................

6.- Note payable three months after demand ; payment
RIPARIAN RIGHTS. Custom as to use of streams:

of interest not evidence of demand.Brown V.
necessary age. Pennsylvania Coal Co. V. Sanderson

Rutherford (Eng. Ch. D.) .....

• ... ..... 2
(Penn. S. C.).............. .....

*****
........ ........... 2

See Partnership.
2.--When artificial water-course treated as natural; com-
pensation for appropriation ; eminent domain. City

STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION. Special act
of Reading y. Althouse (Penn. S. C.).................

controlling general-majority of official board act
See Water-course.

in absence of direction otherwise. Talcott v. Bland-
ing (Cal. S. C.).............

...... ... .......

2.- Old Code, 8 101 ; new Code, 88 381, 414; Laws 1870,
SABBATH BREAKING. See Criminal Law.

ch. 741; 1851, ch.479. Acker v. Acker (N. Y. App.).

3.- Lunatic's estate, sale of; when this court will not
SALE. Of business and good-will. Ginesi v. Cooper

follow State courts as to State statutes Mohir v.
(Eng. Ch. D.) ........
. .......... .....

Manierre (U.S.S. C.)....
2.-Judicial; when advance bid after sale ground for 4.- Nuisance ; oriel window. Goldstraw v. Duekworth
opening; intervention of third person. Blackburn

(Eng. Q. B. D.)........
v. Selma R. R. Co. (U. S. C. C., Tenn.).............4

See Civil Damage Act: Criminal Law; Gambling :
3-of personal property; conditional sale of a horse

Grand Jury; Mails ; Municipal Corporations ; Na.
delivered; death of horse before sale became abso-

tional Banks; Ojice and Oficers ; Postmuster; Prac-
lute. Elphick v. Barnes (Eng. C. P. D.).......

tice ; Railroads,
4.-0f personal property; special contract; waiver;
when part delivery gives right of action. Avery y.

STOCK EXCHANGE. Legality of rules as to
Wilson (V. Y. App.)..........

debts between members. Ec parte Grant; Re Plum-

........ ..............
5.-Of personal property; title of innocent vendee from

bly (Eng. App.)... ..........

............. 70
fraudulent purchaser good delivery. Old Dominion STOCKS. See Corporations.
S. S. Co. v. Burckhardt (Va. S. C.).....

SUBMISSION. See Arbitration.
6.-Fraudulent against creditors. Marvin v. Smith
(Buff. S.C.)...

SUNDAY Laws affecting ono class only invalid. Er
7.-Or return; evidence of sale. Kahn v. Klabunde

parte Westerfield (Cal. S. C.)........
(Wis. S. C.)....

2.-Maritime law; obligation of seaman to work on Sun.
8.--of personal property; title of innocent vendee

day. Smith v. Schooner (U.S. D. C.)...
from fraudulent purchaser good delivery. Old Do-

3.- Travel on; accident, while returning from funeral
minion S. Co. v. Burckhardt (Va. App.)............ 57

by unreasonable and indirect route Davis v. Somer-

ville (Mass. S. C.) ...........
See Conflict of Laws; Trade-mark ; Consignment; Stat-

Hi............ 102
4.- Injury by dog to traveller on; contributory negli-
ute of Fraus.

gence. White v, Lang (Mass. S. C.)....
SAVINGS BANKS. Degree of care required from

See Maritime Lav.
trustees. Hun, Rec'r, v. Cary (N. Y. App.).......... 32 SURETYSHIP. Assumption of debt by one acquir-
2.- What it is; rights of depositors; preferences ; in-

ing contract to sell real estate from vendee as secu-
golvency: special deposits. Stocton, Att'y-Gen.,

rity ; Statute of Frauds. Roe v. Barker (N. Y. App.), 495
v. Mechanics & L. Sav. Bank (N. J. Ch.)............. 1382.- Forbearance does not discharge surety. Winton
See Ultra Vires.

v. Little (Penn. S. C.)..........

......

.........

171

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

PAGE.
TURNPIKE ROAD. Abandonment of; ownership

of building reinaining thereon. Johnson v. Heiser
(Buff. s. C.) ................ .....................

SURETYSHIP- Continued.

PAGE.
3.- Official bond ; when sureties not liable as to duties

imposed by law passed subsequent to execution.
White v. East Saginaw (Mich. S. C.)....

.. 198
4.- Official bond ; tax collector ; how far surety liable.

Ward v. Stahl (N. Y. App.) ..
5.- Official bond ; bond signed with unfilled blanks:

estoppel; office vacant by default in filing bond;
when provision as to vacant directory. City of

Chicago v. Gage (III. S. C.)............. ... .........
6.- What notice surety must give to creditor to compel

legal action against debtor. Hunt v. Purdy (N. Y.
App).......

... 475
7.-Undertaking for employee of corporation; construc-

tion of instrument; change of employment. Collier
v. Southern Ex. Co. (Va. S. G.) ............

See Attorney.

356

[ocr errors]

96

....

ULTRA VIRES. Savings bank may borrow money

and inortgage securities : estoppel by law does not

bind public. Ward v. Johnson (III S. C.)........... 76
UNITED STATES. See Confiscation act.
USAGE. As to sale of tobacco by weight at time of

packing instead of at that of sale: evidence; one

witness may prove usage. Jones v. Hoey (Mass. S. C.) 297
USURY. Accommodation paper; Anding of referee

on conflicting evidence ; certificate by maker of, no
defense; evidence of intent; consideration'; ex-
change of obligations. Bayliss v. Cockroft (N. Y.

App.)......
2.-Equitable action to relieve from usurious contract.
Purnell v. Vaughan (N. C. S. C.)..

.... ........
3.-By agent, not chargeable to principal not cognizant.

Van Wyck v. Walters (N. Y. App.)...............::
4.-Contract will not be presumed to be usurious in

absence of evidence to the contrary; compound in.
terest not of itself usurious; attorney's fee, condition
for lawful. Miner v. Paris Exchange Bank (Tex.
S. C.)

478
5. -As defense in equitable action." Matter of Hoole***

(U.S. D C., N. Y.)........
6.-Negotiable instruments; note made and payable in

New York for use in another State. Wayne County

Savings Bank v. Low (N. Y. App.)..................... 346
7.-Mortgage ; parol evidence ; estoppel by guaranty

of mortgage.' Fellows y. Wallace (Buff. S. C.). ........
8.- Will not be implied where no agreement therefor

exists; commissions. Guggenheimer v. Geiszler (N.
Y. App.) .........

See Constitutional Law; Insurance, Life.
UTAH. See Conflict of Law.

115

...........

.. 155

[blocks in formation]

....

.. 255

TAXATION. Of corporation must be at principal

office as set forth in its certificate of incorporation ;
review of erroneous, need not be by certiorari.

Union Steamboat Co. v. Buffalo (N. Y. S. C.).....
2.- Collector not liable for enforcement of tax; war-

rant valid on its face. Moss v. Cummins (Mich.

S C .)...................... ........... ........... .. . 3
3.- Exemption of cemeteries from; assessment for local

improvement. Olive Cemetery Co. v. Philadelphia

(Penn. S. C.) .. .
4.- Orlands held by religious corporation. Boston Soc.

of Redemptionist Fathers V. Boston (Mass. S. C.). . 375
See Constitutional Law : Eminent Domain; Franchise

National Banks.
TAX COLLECTOR: Liability of, for false return.
Raynsford v. Phelps (Mich. S. C.)...

... 270
TELEGRAPH. See Contract ; Practice.
TELEPHONE. Contract with patentee to deny

privilege to telegraph company invalid State ex
rel. Am. Un. Telegraph Co. v. Bell Telephone Co.

(St. Louis C. C.) ....... ... ...........................
TENANTS IN ENTIRETY. See Husband and

Wife.
TENDER. Pleading; admits the same to be due ;

of debt without costs after suit brought, no avail ;
practice ; decision in writing under Code, 8 1010.

Eaton v. Wells (N. Y. App.)......................... 496
TITLE To goods pledged under unregistered bill of

sale; bona fide purchaser. Taylor v, McKeand (Eng.
C. P. D.) ...... ...............

........... 297
See Banks and Banking; Foreclosure; Sale.
TOWN. Must consist of contiguous territory. Chi-
cago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Oconto (Wis. S. C.)......... 373

See Municipal Corporations.
TRADE. Restraint of; contract in; agreement not

to follow calling within specified limits. Cook v.

Johnson (Conn. S. C.)......... ............
2.- Deceptive use of one's own name in; when will be

restrained. Thorley's Cattle Food Co. v. Massam

(Eng. App.) ..................................... ..... 305
TRADE-MARK. Name of building ; “Tower-

palace;” right to transfer name on removal. Arms-

strong v. Kleinhaus (Louisville Ch. C.)............... 143
2.- Belonging to firm ; sale to partner of personal prop-

erty and premises where business conducted does
not include trade-mark. Huwer v. Dannerhoffer

(N. Y. App.)......
3.- Arabic numerals may be. Lawrence Hosiery Manfg.

Co. v Lowell Hosiery Mills (Mass. S. C.)...
-"Indian" and "Negro "head; similarity o

pear
ance. Leidersdorf v. Flint (Wis. S. C.)........... 442
5.-Right of, independent of statute. Sharer v.
Sharer (Iowa S. C.) ...

U. ........ ............... ........... W0t
6.-"Rye and Rock" to designate mixture of rye

whisky and rock candy not. Van Beil v. Prescott
(N. Y. App.).....................

........ 475
See Author.
TRAVELLER. Seo Sunday.
TRESPASS. Cutting timber; when purchaser from

wrong-doer without knowledge, liable. Hazleton V.
Weeks (Wis. S. C.)......................

........... 137
See Adverse Possession.
TRIAL. Exceptions on. United States v. Hough
(U.S.S. C.).

. ... ...... 47
See Criminal Law; Removal of Cruses.
TROVER Lies for grain intermingled with other

grain when converted. Gerinan National Bank v.

Meadowcraft (Ill. S. C.)................................
TRUST. Partition, naked power to sell or make ex.

change implies power to make. Phelps v. Shrader

(U.S. S. C.)............. ...........................
TRUST FUNDS. Investment of funds brought into

court. Chesterman v. Eyland (N. Y. App.) .......... 129
TRUSTEE. See Corporations.

... 412

[ocr errors]

WAGER. See Contract.
WAIVER. Appearance in justice's court; jurisdic..

tion. Lane v. Leach (Mich S. C.).....

Seu Exemption ; Insurance, Fire; Lease ; Practice.
WAREHOUSE RECEIPT. See Action
WARRANT. See Criminal Law.
WARRANTY. On sale of horse at auction. Hinch-
cliffe v. Barwick (Eng. App.)........................

See Insurance, Fire.
WATER-COURSE. Negligence; obstructing nat-

ural stream; artificial increase in volume of stream

by act of another. Sellick v. Hall (Conn. S. C.). ..
2.- Řight of superior owner to use as outlet; artificial
change in flow. McCormick v. Horan (N. Y App.), 94

See Eminent Domain; Riparian Rights.
WILL. Affirmation of testator before subscribing wit-

nesses ; mero silent presence at reading is not. Aus-

trian case......
2.-Condition precedent to devise must be strictly per..

formed. Nevins v. Gourley (III S. C.).....
3.-Construction; devise to wife with discretion to de-

vise to children gives her fee. Foose y. W bitmere
(N. Y. App )..........
--Construction of; gift to A and the children of B;
wheu donees take per stirpe; intention. Ferrer v.

Pype (N. Y. App.) ......
5.-Construction of devise of fee. Roseboom v. Rose-

boom (N. Y App.) ....
6.--Construction of specific legacy, what is. Dryden

v. Owings (Md. App.) ....
7.--Construction; objects of " vertu and taste" what

are. Londesborough v. Fitzgerald (Eng.)......
- Contract; undue influence; devise : powers in

trust. Jost v. Jost (Buff. S. C.). ..
9.- Devise to children to be alive at a future time; con-

tingent remainder. De Lassus v. Gatewood (Mo.

S. C.)......................
10.- Interlineations in; attestation by testatrix and wil-

nesses initialling interlineations and margin. In

the goods of Blewitt (Eng. P. D. & A. Div.)..........
11.- Mistake in name of legatee : when name will pre

vall Patching v. Barnett (Eng. Ch. D.)

[ocr errors]

Contract i u Jost (Buff. Sive at a future

[ocr errors]

.....

..........

WILL - Continued.

PAGE. 12.- On separate sheets of paper: extrinsic evidence to

show constituent parts. Gould v. Lakes (Eng. Prob.

D.)........ ... . .. ....... ...... ... .. .......... 519 13.- Takes effect as to testator's estate at death; con

struction. Boyes v. Cook (Eng. App.)... ............ 153 14. - Services to testator paid by legacy ; Court of Ap

peals will not reverse on facts; evidence; parol not
admissible to show testator's intention as to legacy;
presumptions as to legacies. Reynolds v. Robinson
N, Y. App.) , ...... .. ..... ...... .... ......... 395

See Bequest; Insanity; Parties; Witness.

PAGE. WITNESS. Cor viction of felony, in one State dis

qualifles in another State v. Foley (Nev: S. C.)....282 2.- Errur to question witness himself as to his relig

ious belief, even after he has been sworn. Arnd v.

Amerling (St. Louis App.)............... .......... 383 3.- Evidence; privilege as to crimination by cross-ex

amination. People v. Freshorn (Cal. S. C) ......... 363 4.- May be questioned as to his intellectual compe

tency. Carter v. State (Ala. S. C.) ....... 5.- Will, triding legacy under, destroying larger inter

est as heir does not disqualify. Smalley v. Smalley (Me, S. C.)....

.... .... ..... 182 See Criminal Law; Evidence.

383

« AnteriorContinuar »