A Report of the Case of the Right Rev. R.D. Hampden, D.D., Lord Bishop Elect of Hereford: In Hereford Cathedral, the Ecclesiastical Courts, and the Queen's Bench

William Benning and Company, 1849 - 518 páginas

Steps preparatory to the Election	3

Ancient usage confirmed by stat 25 Hen	8

ib	26

Account of Cranmers promotion	36

Form of Signification of vacancy of a	38

4	46

No greater effect to be given to the stat of Hen 8 than to the stat	49

Letters Testimonial	50

Andrews Bishop Tortura Torti	282

Eliz c 1	283

Participation of the people in the election of their bishops	286

The right of opposition always treated as a subsisting right	292

Apostolical Constitutions 293 336	293

Bishop of Manchesters case	298

No remedy by appeal in the present case	304

Judicial powers of the archbishop recognized in the forms of con	314

The Election	52

Proceedings in Confirmation mere matters of form	121

Lancelottus and Ferraris no authorities upon the present question	129

396	131

Merely formal character of Confirmation proved from enactments	138

Page	140

Statute of the University of Oxford March 1836	141

No precedent of an application of this description	157

The other members of the archbishops court have	158

Commencing with prayer does not render the ceremony of confirm	175

The Deans Petition to the Queen 17th Dec 1847	179

Gloss of John de Athon	181

78	182

Construction of the term persona Van Espen	189

Analogy of consent of justices to poor rate	195

Parry	211

Edw 6 c 2	214

Mandamus discretionary with the court Authorities	217

Letters patent for episcopal confirmation more stringent than	223

Impossible to conclude the inquiry within the statutory period	230

Stat of Hen 8 does not contemplate opposition at the confirmation	236

Page	244

Language of the letters patent	258

Reg v Justices of Kesteven	261

The Final Sentence	263

And under the canon	264

Case of Cardinal Pole	268

In Parkers case witnesses were sworn and examined in proof	270

The dean and chapter may elect whomsoever they think proper	276

Page	280

Bacons Abridgment 324 355 361 368	324

Mode of construing the penal clause in stat 25 Hen 8 c 20	327

Jus Ecclesiasticum Universum 342 374 375	342

Writs of the crown for the confirmation of bishops following upon	351

Ancient canon law not affected by that statute	361

Form of the writs in Elizabeths reign	363

Probable reason of revival of elective form by Elizabeth	376

Register of Archbp Chicheley	386

Bramhalls Works 163 269 307 387 417	387

Punishment for improperly confirming an unworthy person	392

No injustice thereby done to any other person	397

The real object of the	410

Page	414

Difficulties suggested by the counsel on the other side as to	420

MOTION FOR A MANDAMUS	426

Freedom of inquiry at confirmation does not impugn the crowns	428

Page	431

Case of J Wakeryng Bishop of Norwich Practice during	458

Consideration of confirmation inseparable from that of consecration	464

Page	467

Eliz Ir c 4	471

Direct nomination in England in case of failure by the dean	473

Brett on Church Government	476

Case submitted to Counsel by the Opposers	497

84	505

No confirmation in case of direct nomination	507

Consecration of Dr Hampden	509

329	513

The Deans Protest	516

Título	A Report of the Case of the Right Rev. R.D. Hampden, D.D., Lord Bishop Elect of Hereford: In Hereford Cathedral, the Ecclesiastical Courts, and the Queen's Bench
Autores	Renn Dickson Hampden, Richard Jebb
Colaborador	Great Britain. Court of King's Bench
Editor	William Benning and Company, 1849
Procedencia del original	Universidad de Illinois en Urbana-Champaign
Digitalizado	20 Oct. 2016
Largo	518 páginas

Exportar cita	BiBTeX EndNote RefMan