Sheffield v. London Joint Stock Bank (1888), 13 App. Cas. 333, distinguished and considered London Joint Stock Bank v. Simmons (1892), A. C. 201. Shellard, Ex parte (1873), L. R. 17 Eq. 109, disapproved Buck v. Robson (1878), 3 Q. B. D. at 689. Shepherd v. Harrison (1871), L. R. 5 H. L. 116, distinguished Ex parte Banner (1875), 2 Ch. D. 279. Sibree . Tripp (1846), 15 M. & W. 23, distinguished Foakes v. Beer (1884), 9 App. Cas. 605, at 613. Sleigh v. Sleigh (1850), 5 Exch. 514, discussed Er parte Bishop (1880), 15 Ch. D. at 410, 417. Smith v. Mercer (1815), 6 Taunt. 76, discussed Wilkinson v. Johnson (1824), 3 B. & C. at 437. Solarte v. Palmer (1834), 1 Bing. N. C. 124, regretted Everard v. Watson (1853), 1 E. & B. at 804, qualified Paul v. Joel (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. at 384 Steele v. M Kinlay (1880), 5 App. Cas. 754, distinguished Wilkinson v. Unwin (1881), 7 Q. B. D. 636, at 638, C. A.; Holmes v. Durkee (1883), 1 C. & E. at 25; Macdonald v. Whitfield (1888), 8 App. Cas. 733, P. C. Stoessiger v. South Eastern Railway (1854), 3 E. & B. 549, distinguished R. v. Bowerman (1891), 1 Q. B. 112, at 115. Strange . Price (1839), 10 A. & E. 125, overruled Paul v. Joel (1858), 27 L. J. Ex. at 383. Strong . Foster (1855), 17 C. B. 201, dissented from Ewin v. Lancaster (1865), 6 B. & S. at 576. Suffell v. Bank of England (1882), 9 Q. B. D. 555, followed Leeds and County Bank 2. Walker (1883), 11 Q. B. D. 84. Swinyard v. Bowes (1816), 5 M. & S. 62, distinguished Camidge v. Allenby (1827), 6 B. & C. 373. Tindal . Brown (1786), 1 T. R. 167, overruled Chapman v. Keane (1835), 3 A. & E. at 197. Tinson v. Francis (1807), 1 Camp. 19, dissented from Er parte Swan (1868), L. R. 6 Eq. at 358. Trimbey v. Vignier (1835), 1 Bing. N. C. 151, explained and discussed Bradlaugh v. De Rin (1870), L. R. 5 C. P. 473. Trimingham v. Maud (1868), L. R. 7 Eq. 201, disapproved Ex parte Gomez (1875), L. R. 10 Ch. at 647. Vagliano v. Bank of England (1889), 22 Q. B. D. 103, and in C. A. 23 Q. B. D. 243, reversed by H. L. (1891), A. C. 107. Vanderwall v. Tyrrell (1827), M. & M. 87, explained Geralopulo v. Wieler (1851), 20 L. J. C. P. at 108. Walker v. Barnes (1813), 5 Taunt. 240, dissented from Siggers v. Lewis (1834), 1 Cr. M. & R. at 370. Walwyn v. St. Quintin (1797), 1 B. & P. 652, overruled Cory v. Scott (1820), 3 B. & Ald. 622. Waring, Ex parte (1815), 19 Ves. 345, explained Vaughan v. Halliday (1874), L. R. 9 Ch. 561, and Re Yglesias (1875), L. R. 10 Ch. 635, discussed Royal Bank of Scotland v. Commercial Bank (1882), 7 App. Cas. 366, Ex parte Dever (1885), 14 Q. B. D. 611. Warrington v. Furbor (1807), 8 East, 242, distinguished Camidge v. Allenby (1827), 6 B. & C. 373. Wells v. Giles (1836), 2 Gale, 209, approved Kennedy v. Thomas (1894), 2 Q. B. 759, C. A. Williams v. Bayley (1866), L. R. 1 H. L. 200, explained Flower v. Sadler (1882), 10 Q. B. D. 572, at 574. C. A. Williams v. Colonial Bank (1888), 38 Ch. D. 388, affirmed by H. L., as Colonial Bank v. Cady (1890), 15 App. Cas. 267. Woodridge v. Spooner (1819), 3 B. & Ald. 233, followed Stott v. Fairlamb (1883), 52 L. J. Q. B. 420. Woolsey v. Crawford (1810), 2 Camp. 445, dissented from Re General South American Company (1877), 7 Ch. D. at 644. Yates, Ex parte (1857), 27 L. J. Bk. 9, commented on Lecaan v. Kirkman (1859), 6 Jur. N. S. 17. Yeo v. Dawe (1884), 33 W. R. 739, commented on Mortgage Ins. Corporation v. Inland Revenue (1887), 21 Q. B. D. at 353, C. A. Young . Grote (1827), 4 Bing. 253, commented on Société Générale v. Metropolitan Bank (1873), 27 L. T. 849, discussed Arnold v. Cheque Bank (1876), 1 C. P. D. at 586; and Baxendale v. Bennett (1878), 3 Q. B. D. at 583, questioned Scholfield v. Londesborough (1894), 1 Q. B. 536, C. A. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. Chitty Chitty on Bills of Exchange. 11th edition. 1878. German Exchange Law-German General Exchange Law of 1849. Pothier-Pothier, Traité du Contrat de Change. Paris. 1847. Story-Story's Commentary on the Law of Bills of Exchange. 4th edition. 1860. |