Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Union G. M. Co. v. Rocky Mountain Bank, 2 Colo. 565.

368

[blocks in formation]

W

Wadsworth v. Brown, 39 Colo. 57.
Warford v. People, 43 Colo. 107.
Webber v. Wannemaker, 39 Colo. 425.
Wechter v. People, 53 Colo. 89..

Wells v. Adams, 7 Colo. 26....

Western Union Co. v. Eyser, 2 Colo. 141.

Whitehead v. Johnson, 51 Colo. 587..
Willard v. Mellor, 19 Colo. 534..
Williams v. Carr, 4 Col. Ap. 368.
Williams v. Fuel Co., 55 Colo. 133.
Wilson v. Welch, 8 Col. Ap. 210.
Winch v. Edmunds, 34 Colo. 359.
Woodworth v. Gorsline, 30 Colo. 186.
Wyatt v. Irrigation Co., 18 Colo. 298.
Wyman v. Colorado Bank, 5 Colo. 30.

[blocks in formation]

Page.

484

283

245

284

270

463

148, 387

582

135

148, 387

90

381

268

588

441

370

575

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF THE

STATE OF COLORADO.

January Term, A. D. 1915.

[No. 8182.]

REIGAN V. OLDLAND.

APPEAL AND ERROR-Judgment Not Supported by Record. In an action instituted before a Justice of the Peace, judgment was given against a garnishee. On appeal to the County Court the garnishee was discharged, upon the ground that no valid judgment had been rendered against the defendant. There being nothing in the transcript of the Justice's docket to show such invalidity, or any irregularity in his proceedings, the judg ment of the County Court was reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to determine, de novo, the issue raised by the answer of the garnishee.

Error to Rio Grande County Court. HON. THOMAS SHERVIN, Judge.

error.

Messrs. GRIFFITH, WATSON & SMITH, for plaintiff in

Mr. JAMES C. GENTRY, for defendant in error.

SCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff brought this action against Laura G. Foote, a non-resident of the state, before a justice of the peace in Rio Blanco county. The proceeding was one in attachment, and a summons in garnishment was served upon the defendant in error, Oldland. The latter appeared and filed his answer to the summons denying that he was indebted to the defendant, Foote, or that he had any of her property within his control. The plaintiff traversed this answer, and upon a hearing upon the traverse, Oldland appeared before the court and testified.

The court found that Foote, the defendant, was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred dollars and sustained the attachment and traverse. From this judgment Oldland, the garnishee, appealed to the County Court. In that court Oldland moved the court to discharge him as garnishee, for the reason that no valid judgment had been rendered in the Justice Court against Laura G. Foote, the principal defendant in the cause. This motion was sustained and the garnishee thereupon discharged, and this presents the question before us for review.

It will be observed that the sole ground of the motion to discharge the garnishee was that no valid judgment had been rendered against Foote, the principal defendant, by the Justice Court. The only evidence upon this point was the transcript of record by the Justice of the Peace.

An examination of this record discloses that there is nothing therein contained to show the judgment to be void, nor that there was substantial irregularity as to the judgment against the defendant Foote.

The judgment is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to determine, de novo, the sole question in the case, which is the issue raised by the answer of Oldland to the garnishee summons, and the traverse thereof by the plaintiff.

Judgment is reversed.

GABBERT, C. J., and GARRIGUES, J., concur.

« AnteriorContinuar »