Reclaiming a Scientific AnthropologyAltaMira Press, 2008 - 229 páginas This second edition of Reclaiming a Scientific Anthropology arrives at just the right time, as new advances in science increasingly affect anthropologists of all stripes. Lawrence Kuznar begins by reviewing the basic issues of scientific epistemology in anthropology as they have taken shape over the life of the discipline. He then describes postmodern and other critiques of both science and scientific anthropology, and he concludes with stringent analyses of these debates. This new edition brings this important text firmly into the 21st century; it not only updates the scholarly debates but it describes new research techniques--such as computer modeling systems--that could not have been imagined just a decade ago. In a field that has become increasingly divided over basic methods of reasearch and interpretation, Kuznar makes a powerful argument that anthropology should return to its roots in empirical science. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 4
Página 112
... middle range theory to address this problem of inference ( Binford 1977 , 1982 ) . Middle range theories are theories of archaeological residue forma- Static Archaeological Remains Present Middle Range Theory and Inferences Dynamic ...
... middle range theory to address this problem of inference ( Binford 1977 , 1982 ) . Middle range theories are theories of archaeological residue forma- Static Archaeological Remains Present Middle Range Theory and Inferences Dynamic ...
Página 113
... middle range theory , they would not be able to make scientifically reliable inferences that in turn could be used to test anthropo- logical theories . Archaeologists since have approached the construction of middle range theory by ...
... middle range theory , they would not be able to make scientifically reliable inferences that in turn could be used to test anthropo- logical theories . Archaeologists since have approached the construction of middle range theory by ...
Página 118
... middle range theory places no restrictions on the content or degree of generality of the claim , only on its use for making sense of ( finding information in ) the evidence . . . . Middle range theories , recall , are just ordinary ...
... middle range theory places no restrictions on the content or degree of generality of the claim , only on its use for making sense of ( finding information in ) the evidence . . . . Middle range theories , recall , are just ordinary ...
Índice
Anthropological Science | 3 |
ScienceProblems with Progress | 31 |
Anthropological ScienceTwo Examples | 45 |
Página de créditos | |
Otras 10 secciones no se muestran.
Otras ediciones - Ver todo
Términos y frases comunes
Academic advocate analysis anthro anthropological science antiscience approach archaeology argue argument assert basic behavior biases Bourdieu Cambridge causal chapter Chicago Clifford complex computational concepts concerns critical critique Cultural Anthropology Current Anthropology D'Andrade debate developed discipline empirical epistemology ethical Ethnoarchaeology ethnographic ethnography evaluation existence Explanation fact falsifiability feminist Feyerabend forager Giddens gists hermeneutics Hodder Hopewell Hopewellian human Hunter-Gatherer Hunters hunting hypotheses influence interpretations Irven Devore issues knowledge Kuhn Kung Kuznar Lakatos logical maize metaphysical middle range theory moral mounds Native Americans Navajo notes notion objective observations paradigm past perspective phenomena philosophers political pologists postmodern postmodern anthropologists postmodernists practice problem processual archaeology Rabinow Raoul Naroll reality refuted role Rosaldo scientific anthropologists scientific method scientific revolution scientists Shanks and Tilley share Sidky Social Science society statements structure testable theoretical theories tion truth Tyler University Press Watson York