Reclaiming a Scientific AnthropologyAltaMira Press, 2008 - 229 páginas This second edition of Reclaiming a Scientific Anthropology arrives at just the right time, as new advances in science increasingly affect anthropologists of all stripes. Lawrence Kuznar begins by reviewing the basic issues of scientific epistemology in anthropology as they have taken shape over the life of the discipline. He then describes postmodern and other critiques of both science and scientific anthropology, and he concludes with stringent analyses of these debates. This new edition brings this important text firmly into the 21st century; it not only updates the scholarly debates but it describes new research techniques--such as computer modeling systems--that could not have been imagined just a decade ago. In a field that has become increasingly divided over basic methods of reasearch and interpretation, Kuznar makes a powerful argument that anthropology should return to its roots in empirical science. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 87
Página 32
... scientists should do science ( 1970 : 209 ) . Kuhn notes that scientists within groups share paradigms . He defines a paradigm as “ a set of recurrent and quasi - standard illustrations of various theories in their conceptual ...
... scientists should do science ( 1970 : 209 ) . Kuhn notes that scientists within groups share paradigms . He defines a paradigm as “ a set of recurrent and quasi - standard illustrations of various theories in their conceptual ...
Página 38
... scientists actually do in order to infer the rules by which they actually operate . Lakatos echoes Popper's most basic points . He is primarily concerned with normative analyses of how scientists should evaluate theories . Lakatos ...
... scientists actually do in order to infer the rules by which they actually operate . Lakatos echoes Popper's most basic points . He is primarily concerned with normative analyses of how scientists should evaluate theories . Lakatos ...
Página 133
... scientists choose to observe and how they interpret it . Finally , once scientists have done research , they have little control over how it will be perceived and the consequences it will engender ( Vincent 1991 : 58 ) . However ...
... scientists choose to observe and how they interpret it . Finally , once scientists have done research , they have little control over how it will be perceived and the consequences it will engender ( Vincent 1991 : 58 ) . However ...
Índice
Anthropological Science | 3 |
ScienceProblems with Progress | 31 |
Anthropological ScienceTwo Examples | 45 |
Página de créditos | |
Otras 10 secciones no se muestran.
Otras ediciones - Ver todo
Términos y frases comunes
Academic advocate analysis anthro anthropological science antiscience approach archaeology argue argument assert basic behavior biases Bourdieu Cambridge causal chapter Chicago Clifford complex computational concepts concerns critical critique Cultural Anthropology Current Anthropology D'Andrade debate developed discipline empirical epistemology ethical Ethnoarchaeology ethnographic ethnography evaluation existence Explanation fact falsifiability feminist Feyerabend forager Giddens gists hermeneutics Hodder Hopewell Hopewellian human Hunter-Gatherer Hunters hunting hypotheses influence interpretations Irven Devore issues knowledge Kuhn Kung Kuznar Lakatos logical maize metaphysical middle range theory moral mounds Native Americans Navajo notes notion objective observations paradigm past perspective phenomena philosophers political pologists postmodern postmodern anthropologists postmodernists practice problem processual archaeology Rabinow Raoul Naroll reality refuted role Rosaldo scientific anthropologists scientific method scientific revolution scientists Shanks and Tilley share Sidky Social Science society statements structure testable theoretical theories tion truth Tyler University Press Watson York