PEOPLE EX REL. Ross v. DoOLING.. Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 616. PEOPLE EX REL. SWAN v. DOXSEE.. Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 605. PEOPLE EX REL. THIRD AVE. R. R. Co. v. STATE Board of ...... Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 608. PEOPLE EX REL. TORMEY V. POLK.... PEOPLE EX REL. UNGER v. BINGHAM... Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 607. PEOPLE EX REL. WALSH v. BINGHAM...... ... Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 505. Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 568. 126 App. Div. 905 Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 514. Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 557. PLUNKETT V. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. R. Co............. PRAY. TODD...... PRESTON 7. UNION ASSURANCE SOCIETY... 130 App. Div. 896 Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant: 198 N. Y. 577. PRIOLO v. SOUTHARD WRECKING & TRUCKING CO....... Judgment reversed and new trial granted: 198 N. Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 510. REPUBLIC LIFE INS. Co. v. HUDSON TRUST CO.. Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant: 198 N. Y. 590. RIESER v. COMMEAU... RIKER v. MOADINGER... ...... ..... 129 App. Div. 490 129 App. Div. 906 Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 632. ROBINS V. BERTRAM ......... 136 App. Div. 900 Appeal dismissed: 198 N. Y. 550. 129 App. Div. 1 ROBINSON . INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA.. Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of trial court affirmed: 198 RUPPRECHT v. ST. MARY'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH SOCIETY. 131 App. Div. 564 Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 576. Judgment modified and as modified affirmed: 198 N. Y. 415. SHEARS v. TOWN OF UNION VALE.. Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 573. SHEPARD & MORSE LUMBER Co. v. HURD.... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 624. SHOECRAFT v. LOCKE INSULATOR MFG. CO...... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 631. SMITH V. BARTLETT.. ....... 129 App. Div. 925 ... 128 App. Div. 28 129 App. Div. 933 131 App. Div. 915 134 App. Div. 909 Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y 619. SMITH V. PHOENIX BRIDGE Co..... Order of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed: 198 N. Y. SMYTH V. Fox...... 614. Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 509. SNELL v. REMINGTON PAPER Co..... STEELE v. GATES..... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 636. Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 544. STRAIT V. PROTECTED HOME CIRCLE... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 519. SWAIN ". SCHONLEBEN.. SWOBODA v. HOLLINS. Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 622. ...... .... ................. 127 App. Div. 940 Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. £58. ...... 135 App. Div. 538 128 App. Div. 420 TESCHMACHER v. CLEMENT... Order affirmed: 198 N. Y. 556. THOMPSON V. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. Co...... Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant: 198 N. Y. 582. TOLSON V. NATIONAL PROVIDENT UNION..... 130 App. Div. 884 Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 535. 126 App. Div. 556 TROUTWINE v. HOFF.... .... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 536. TUCKER v. SUPREME TENT OF THE KNIGHTS OF THE MACCABEES OF THE WORLD.... 128 App. Div. 918 Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 577. TWEEDIE v. CLARK........... UNGRICH. SHAFF..... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 517. .... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 565. UVALDE ASPHALT PAVING Co. v. CITY OF NEW YORK. Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 548. VOGEMANN v. AMERICAN DOCK & TRUST Co... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 586. VOORHEES v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co..... WARREN v. POST & MCCORD.... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 624. WASHINGTON LIFE Ins. Co. v. SCOTT.... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 637. WASSERMAN v. JACOBS.... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 547. WEBBER 7. FRANKLIN BREWING CO...... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 509. WEIDENKOFER v. CONNOLLY....... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 534. 127 App. Div. 934 130 App. Div. 902 .... 128 App. Div. 210 131 App. Div. 216 ... 129 App. Div. 780 .... 120 App. Div. 189 131 App. Div. 921 126 App. Div. 938 128 App. Div. 572 128 App. Div. 929 130 App. Div. 902 123 App. Div. 465 127 App. Div. 947 123 App. Div. 913 Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 530. WHEELER V. NORTHRUP..... WILCOX v. CITY & COUNTY CONTRACT Co...... Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 588. WILLIAMS. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT Co...,. . . . . . . Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 589. Judgment reversed and new trial granted: 198 N. Y. 470. The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decides an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below. The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in or dissented from the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.)— [REP. |