Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Before the statute, a gift to a man and the heirs of his body was a fee simple conditional, and, so long as it was not aliened, would descend to the lineal heirs of the donee, to some extent according to the form of the gift, but subject to qualifications and exceptions, which I defy any one to reconcile and explain, on any principle which shall be consistent with the authorities. The truth is, that, in this, as on many other points, the old lawyers were far more astute, than accurate or consistent. The courts, in applying the Statute de Donis, interfered only so far as was necessary to secure the substance of the will of the donor, and "created," as Littleton says, the estate tail, with all its anomalies, rejecting possessio fratris, admitting curtesy and dower. These anomalies did not exist in the case of a descent in fee simple; and the rules which governed estates tail were quite peculiar, and furnished no guide to the determination of questions affecting descents in fee simple. On the contrary, so far from descents in tail and in fee simple to lineal issue being under the old law identical or similar, they were distinguished by the most striking differences. Of an estate tail there might be successive descents to the heir of the same person, which could not be of a fee simple. An estate tail descended, according to peculiar rules, to the heir of the purchaser; a fee simple descended to the heir of the person last seised: and a fee simple would not descend to any issue of the purchaser, who was not of the whole blood to the person last seised; a fee tail was subject to no such restriction. In fine, the case of an estate tail affords no parallel to the case in hand, because all the rules with respect to estates tail have for their object the fulfilment of an intention expressed with reference to one entire estate, while the enactment in question has reference to nothing but the immediate subject of descent, whenever descent happens.

anomalies tolerated on grounds of policy or justice),
there was, at the common law, in each of the cases put
by J. W., and is still, but one single descent, perfected
by the first entry of the coparcener or her representa-
tive, and not, as he would have us believe, successive de-
scents, such as the recent statute has introduced in cases
where the deceased has acquired seisin; for it is to be ob-
served, that the construction of the statute which I am
advocating makes no change, except where the deceased
coparcener had acquired seisin, so as to create a new
descent, the statute not creating several descents where
there was formerly only one, but merely introducing a
new rule for ascertaining the heir in certain cases.
J. W. notices, as an objection to the proposed inter-
pretation, the anomalous consequence, that the hus-
band of the deceased coparcener would be tenant by
the curtesy of a larger share than would descend to her
son. But the question is not what share her son
would take, but what share her heir would take. But
his favourite common law did allow of a similar ano-
maly to that which he unjustly charges on the new
law: a widow is endowed of one-third of the inherit-
ance; but, if an heir died before seisin, and his widow
claimed her dower, his heir, by the retrospective effect
of the widow's seisin, became entitled to one-third of
the estate, subject to the widow's life estate in the entire
share thus inherited.

J.W.'s observations on the descent of a fee simple at the common law prove merely this: that the editor of Bythewood, when he suggests, (vol. 1, p. 139), that, on the death of a coparcener before entry, her share would have descended under the old law as it now does under the statute, and J. C. C., who agrees with him, are both in error. But J. W. is equally in error, in supposing that there is, in the proposed case, any descent at all of the share of the deceased heiress, as such. The case is simply this: On the death of the person seised, the right to the inheritance descends on the heir, and if such heir enter, his title is perfected; but, in the meantime, he has nothing but an inchoate right, which is assets, indeed, for some purposes, (3 Vin. Åbr. "Assets," A. 3), and liable to dower, (instances of the law's tenderness to creditors and widows, by prolonging in their persons, in a qualified way, the life and identity of the deceased heir), but which right, on the death of the heir without entry, is at an end; so that, until the heir for the time being enters, there is no complete descent. The inheritance remains vacant until entry, and, from the death of the person last seised to the entry of his heir, there is but one descent; and the case is the same under the statute. If the deceased owner has left two daughters, A. and B., until one of them enters, (for the benefit of both*), the inheritance is vacant; and, on A.'s death leaving a son, such son has an inchoate title to a moiety, not because he is heir to his mother, and as on a new de- appointed the following gentlemen Masters Extraordiscent, but because there is a descent from his grand-nary in the high Court of Chancery:-Octavius Green, father, which has not yet been perfected by entry. For of Cambridge; Montague George Smith, of Hemel the purpose of designating the heir, then, (and inde- Hempstead, Hertfordshire. pendently of the rights of dowresses, creditors, &c.,

I will conclude with one word on J. W.'s difficulties as to curtesy. It seems to me that he entirely mistakes the operation of the enactment. What shall be a descent, and from whom an estate shall descend, are questions which the act leaves untouched. On the death of the purchaser's daughter after entry, her son and his aunts take by descent from the daughter, and as her heir: the act has performed its office when it has furnished the rule for ascertaining these persons. If this were not so, the deceased daughter's share would not be assets for payment of her debts. So, under the old law, you traced your descent through (and, therefore, from) a common ancestor, but you did not inherit as his heir. The old rules as to curtesy, therefore, remain unaltered, and even the requisite of seisin seems to be as essential as formerly. Any argument founded on the irrationality of requiring seisin might, indeed, be answered by reference to the case of an estate tail, to which, as J. W. has shewn, the commonly-assigned ground for requiring actual seisin does not apply. But, however this may be, the fact is, that the statute has made no change; for, in the case of the death of an heiress coverte before entry, there was (as we have seen) no fresh descent; it was the old descent from her ancestor which remained open; and, as the statute does not make a descent where there was none before, it is to that old descent alone that the statute applies. The unexpected result is, that, in every case where a coparcener has died, the inquiry as to whether she was actually seised or not is as important now as it was (under different circumstances) at the common law, although the principal object of the enactment was to render the question of seisin immaterial in every case. G. S.

[blocks in formation]

MASTERS IN CHANCERY.-The Lord Chancellor has

POOR LAW COMMISSIONERS.-The following gentlemen have been appointed Assistant Poor Law Commissioners: John Thomas Graves, Esq., of the Inner Temple; and John Ball, Stephen's Green, Dublin, for a period of six months from the 2nd April. The last-mentioned gentleman has likewise been directed to carry into effect the provisions of the "Act for the more effectual Relief of the destitute Poor in Ireland."

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Midd. Reg. v. Pelham

[ocr errors]

Goode v. Cochrane

Surrey-Dobson v. Blackmore

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]

Jacobs v. Dawes

[merged small][ocr errors]

Girdlestone

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Lond.-Buisson v. Staunton

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Browne v. Harnor Welsh & an. v. Reed Murrieta v. Oldfield Stafford-Sherratt v. Christie Nicoll v. Gillan Biddlestone v. Burdett Essex-Rogers v. Kennay

[ocr errors]

Doe d. Goody v. Carter Surrey-Gillett v. Bullivant

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Youell v. Cross
Archer v. Smyth
Doe d. Pennington
v. Barrell

Northamp-Suttonv. Maquire
Cardiff-Taylor v. Clay & an.
Doe d. Lord v. Kings-
bury
Carmarth-Protheroe v.Jones
Chambers v. Thomas
Same v. Same
Same v. Same

[ocr errors]

Cardigan-Doe d. Jenkins v.

Davies

Brecon-Mayberyv. Mansfield
York-Smith v. Smith

Marshall v. Powell
Spence v. Meynell
Doe d. Norton v.
Norton

Bainbridge v. Bourne

[ocr errors]

Phillips v. Broadley

Petch v. Lyon

[ocr errors]

Brown v. Ayre

[ocr errors]

Wilson v. Nightingale

[ocr errors]

James v. Brook

Lincoln-Saffery v. Wray

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]

Wilkinson v. Haygarth

Same v. Same

[ocr errors]

Warwick-Blakesley v. Small

Leicester-Hassell v. Heming

[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Bainbridge v. Lax

Durham-Smith v. Hopper

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Reed v. Same Hinde v. Raine Devon-Doe d. Earl of Egremont v. Sydenham Mayor of Exeter v. Harvey & an. Damerellv. Protheroe Schank v. Sweetland Cornwall-Marshall v. Hicks Somerset-Doe d. Earl of

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Those marked thus * are Special cases-the rest are demurrers.

FOR ARGUMENT.

*Oliverson & an. v. Brightman
*Bold & an. v. Rotherham
Scott v. Hartley
*Dale v. Pollard
Pollitt v. Forest & ors. (E)
Stephenson v. Newman
Barber & ors. v. Butcher
Churley v. Boycot
Swallow v. Ridgway
Vine & an. v. Bird
*Scadding v. Lorant
Rigby v. Weymouth
Vine & an. v. Bird
Garrett v. Dryden
Higgins v. Thomas
Giles v. Giles
Taylor v. Brook

Gatty v. Field
Wintle v.
Graves
Rogers v. Grazebrook
Pennell & ors. v. Rhodes
Dolby v. Rimington
Springett v. Morrell
*Robinson v. Hawksford

*Flanders v. Bunbury
Sharp v. Watts
Whitaker v. Richards
Frost v. Lloyd

[blocks in formation]

land Railway Co.

Same v. Same
*Bottomley v. Buckley
Davis v. Vernon
Burton v. Yardley

Griffiths v. Thomas & an.
Wood v. Earl of Portarlington
*Doe d. Haxby v. Preston
Reg. v. Hall (part heard)
Reg. v. Slyman

Reg. v. The Council of the
Birmingham

Egremont v. Wil-Reg. v. Pemberton

liams

Midd. Hopkins v. Richard- Bristol-Addison v. Gibson

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

*Reg. v. The Recorder of

[blocks in formation]

Reg. v. The Lords of the Trea- In re Cotes

sury Reg. v. Sharp

Second Day.

*Crofts v. Osborn

In re Whall

The St. Katherine Dock Co.

Cobb v. Saville
v. Higgs
Raworth v. King
*Colman v. Holmes
*Wall v. Pickernell
*Alexander v. Williams

*Doe d. Bellamy v. Partridge

*Soden v.

Percy

*Reg. v. The Inhabitants of

Leeds

*Reg. v. Same

Reg. v. The Dean and Chapter

of Chester

Reg. v. The Collector of Customs at Liverpool

Fourth Day.

*In re Ford

*In re Long

[blocks in formation]

Yorkshire

Ely.....

Yorkshire

Inhabitants of Ashburton.
William Bond.

Inhabitants of Bradford.

Thomas Paynter.

Mayor of Dover.

Inhabitants of Keighley.

[blocks in formation]

Devonshire

Surrey

Leicestershire..

Lincolnshire

Huntingdonsh.

Devonshire

Essex.....

...

Buckinghamsh.

Middlesex

Surrey

Same

....

Staffordshire..

Northumberland

Middlesex....

Worcestershire

Devonshire

...

New Sarum ..

Inhabitants of Chatham, Kent.
Inhabitants of Northowram.
Inhabitants of Newton Ferrars.
Churchwardens of St. Mary, Lambeth.
Inhabitants of Radcliffe Culey.
Trustees of the river Welland.
Inhabitants of Molesworth.
Inhabitants of Holne.

Inhabitants of Saffron Walden,
Churchwardens of Aylesbury with
Salton.

Inhabitants of St. Giles in the Fields.
Thomas Pocock.

Inhabitants of St. Clement's Danes.
Thomas Pratt.

Newcastle and Carlisle Railway Co.
Inhabitants of St. Ann, Westminster.
Birmingham & Gloucester Railw. Co.
James Griffin.

Inhabitants of St. Martin.

Middlesex... A. R. Hamilton v. Reg. (in error).

Middlesex.... Reg. v. London, Westminster, and Vauxhall

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

FOR JUDGMent.
Duncan v. Benson-D.

(Heard 2nd June, 1845).
Doe d. Haw v. Earles-Sp. C.
(Heard 21st Jan. 1846).
Doe d. Lloydv. Ingleby-S.C.

(Heard 21st Jan. 1846). Cooke v. Turner-D.

(Heard 13th Feb. 1846).

FOR ARGUMENT. Offor v. Windsor-D. (To stand over at the request of parties until sp. case settled) Dean and Chapter of Ely v. Cash (special case by order of Lord Chancellor) Trail v. Bonney (special case by order of Alderson, B.)

PEREMPTORY PAPER.

To be called on the first Day of Term after the Motions, and to be proceeded with the next Day, if necessary, before

Motions.

Benn v. Stockdale

Stockdale v. Benn
Beynon v. Jones

Mummery v. Paul

Way v. Smith

Band v. Hill

Doe d. Lloyd v. Roe
Bevington v. Griffith

COMMON-LAW SITTINGS, IN AND AFTER
EASTER TERM, 1846.

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

1st sitting..Thursday, Apr. 16, and two following days, at 11. 2nd ditto Monday, 20, and subsequent days, at 11. Wednesday, May 6, at half-past 9 precisely, (for undefended causes only).

3rd ditto

..

A list of such remanets as appear fit to be tried in term will be printed immediately, but on the statement of either side that a cause is too long to be tried in term, it will be withdrawn from such list, provided the other side have two days' Tolson v. The Bishop of Car- notice of the application at the Marshal's to postpone, and do

To 10th Day.

lisle
Tomlinson v. Boughey

DEMURRER

PAPER.

[blocks in formation]

Beard v. Egerton
Cundell v. Dawson
Cooper v. Shepherd
Brown v. Gill
Pryce v. Belcher

Benham v. Earl of Mornington
Easton v. Peploe

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

.... May 9 | Monday .......... May 11 The court will sit at ten o'clock in the forenoon on each of the days in term, and at half-past nine precisely on each of the days after term.

BENJAMIN REBBECK, Dog-row, Cambridge-heath-road, and Rose-place, Globe-road, Mile-end-road, Middlesex, oil and colour man, dealer and chapman, April 13 at half-past 12, and May 18 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Turquand; Sol. Goren, South Moltenstreet.-Fiat dated March 31.

JAMES SHEPHERD GREGSON, Manchester, grocer, dealer and chapman, April 18 and May 8 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Hobson; Sols. Hampson & Son, Manchester; Gregory & Co., Bed. ford-row, London.-Fiat dated April 1.

The causes in the list for each of the above sitting days in JOHN BIRD, Durham, out of business, April 20 at half-past

term, if not disposed of on those days, will be tried by adjournment on the days following each of such sitting days.

On Monday, the 11th May, in London, no causes will be tried, but the court will adjourn to a future day.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

RICHARD GATEHOUSE, RICHARD DARCH, and GASTRILL WILKINS, Upper Lisson-street, Middlesex, timber merchants, dealers and chapmen, April 17 and May 19 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Alsager; Sol. Lambert, Raymond-buildings, Gray's Inn.Fiat dated March 31. ROBERT MOIR, West Cowes, Isle of Wight, Southampton, stationer and jeweller, dealer and chapman, April 17 and May 22 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Whitmore; Sol. Woollen, Bucklersbury.-Fiat dated March 28. GEORGE FELTHOUSE, Dorcas-terrace, Fulham, Middlesex, plumber and glazier, dealer and chapman, April 17 at half-past 12, and May 19 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Alsager; Sols. Watson & Son, Bouverie-street, Fleet-street, and Hammersmith.-Fiat dated March 18. RICHARD ARSCOTT, Kingsland-road, Middlesex, grocer, dealer and chapman, April 22 at half-past 1, and May 19 at half-past 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Whitmore; Sols. Simpson & Cobb, Moorgate-street.-Fiat dated April 1. JOHN BARWISE, St. Martin's-lane, Middlesex, watch maker, April 21 at 12, and May 19 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Groom; Sol. Luttly, Dyers'hall, College-st., Dowgate-hill, City.-Fiat dated April 1. JAMES HARE, New-street, Dorset-sq., Middlesex, linen draper, dealer and chapman, April 13 at half-past 1, and May 18 at half-past 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Turquand; Sols. Hardwick & Co., Weavers'

hall.-Fiat dated March 31.

JOSEPH QUARTON, Stamford-bridge, Yorkshire, grocer, dealer and chapman, April 20 and May 7 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Kynaston; Sols. Wood, York; Sykes, Leeds; Jaques & Co., Ely-place,

London.-Fiat dated March 27.

WILLIAM TWEDDLE, Liverpool, soap manufacturer, dealer and chapman, April 21 at 11, and May 12 at 2, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool: Off. Ass. Morgan; Sols. Pemberton, Liverpool; Cornthwaite & Co., Old Jewry-chambers, London.-Fiat dated May 24.

10, and May 25 at half-past 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Off. Ass. Baker; Sols. Brignall, Durham; Hartley, Southampton-st., Bloomsbury, London.-Fiat dated March 28.

WILLIAM GRAY, Salford, Lancashire, common brewer, dealer and chapman, (carrying on business in the name of William Gray & Co.), April 18 and May 8 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester: Off. Ass. Hobson; Sols. Ryalls, Sheffield; Gleadall, Manchester; Moss, Serjeants' Inn, Fleet-street.-Fiat dated March 26.

MEETINGS.

Dav. Clark, New Broad-st., London, merchant, April 29 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, pr. d.-Mary Butterfield and Thos. A. Butterfield, Royston, Hertfordshire, linen drapers, April 28 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, pr. d.John C. Chambers, Ipsley, Warwickshire, needle manufac ham, last ex.-Wm. Grosvenor, Shelton and Hanley, Stoketurer, May 4 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingupon-Trent, Staffordshire, iron founder, May 30 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, last ex.-John H. Banks, Great Newport-st., Middlesex, engraver, April 29 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Geo. S. Neale, Portsea, Hampshire, innkeeper, April 29 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Hon. Fran. Hen. Needham, New Bond-st. and Fairfield-lodge, Addison-road, Kensington, Middlesex, dressing-case maker, April 29 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Chas. O. Robson, Finsbury. street, Finsbury-square, Middlesex, plasterer, April 30 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Thos. Dean, Chenies-street, Tottenham-court-road, Middlesex, victualler, April 29 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac. and div.-Benj. Thompson, Aldeburgh, Suffolk, innkeeper, April 29 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac. and div.Edw. Clayton, Edgeware-road, Middlesex, licensed victualler, April 29 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac. and div.-John Reay and John Rob. Reay, Mark-lane, London, wine merchants, April 18 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Sam. Pursell, Strand, Middlesex, ironmonger, April 29 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.— Alexander Inglis, Portsea, Southampton, draper, April 30 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-William Tomlinson the younger, Nantwich, Cheshire, money scrivener, April 28 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-Wm. Slater, Marton, Whitegate, Cheshire, banker, April 28 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liver pool, aud. ac.-John Ogle, Esq., Pickwick, Wiltshire, and Wm. Walton, Liverpool, merchant, April 28 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac. joint est.; at 12, aud. ac. sep. est. J. Ogle.-G. F. Fairclough, Liverpool, money scrivener, April 28 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool,aud. ac.-J. Melhuish, Exeter, innkeeper, April 29 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter, aud. ac.—Andrew Allen and Wm. Allen, South Shields, Durham, drapers, April 28 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastleupon-Tyne, aud. ac. sep. est. Andrew Allen.-Bartholomew Dowell, Bishop Wearmouth, Durham, builder, April 28 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, aud. ac. -Jacob Banks, Keswick, Cumberland, black lead pencil ma. nufacturer, April 29 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, aud. ac.-George Wilkinson and Joseph Wilkinson, Bishop Auckland, Durham, curriers, April 28 at half-past 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-uponTyne, aud. ac.-John Todd, Hylton Ferry, Durham, ship builder, April 28 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne aud. ac.; April 30 at half-past 1, div.James Harrington and Wm. Pattinson, St. Cuthbert, Cumberland, calico printers, April 28 at half-past 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, aud. ac.-Wm.

五醬

Brown, Atherstone, Warwickshire, ironmonger, April 30 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.; May 2 at 11, div.-Wm. Harrison, Wm. Gorst, Wm. Harrison, Saml. Cooke, and John Fairweather Harrison, Tower. street, London, merchants, April 28 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div. sep. est. J. F. Harrison.-Walter Spiers, North Audley-street, Oxford-street, Middlesex, printer, April 30 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-G. Goddard, Leicester, tea dealer, April 30 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Alex. Winton, David Winton, and James Weller, Wood-street, Cheapside, London, warehousemen, April 30 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div. sep. est. J. Webber.-C. O'Niel, Newman-st., Oxford-st., Middlesex, picture dealer, Robert Salkeld, Fontmell Magna, Dorsetshire, derk, and George S. Digby, Esq., Bishop's Caundle, Dorsetshire, ship owner, April 30 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Mary Guy and Henry Smith, Farringdon-street and Ludgate-hill, London, linen drapers, April 29 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Benjamin Wade, Strand, Middlesex, tailor, April 29 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-George Watt, Old Jewry, London, linen factor, April 29 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London., div. -W. P. Kay and E. N. Kendall, Bedford-street, Commercial-road, Stepney, Middlesex, brewers, May 1 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div. sep. est. E. N. Kendall.-G. C. Bridge, Maldon, Essex, grocer, May 1 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Robert Marshall, Pleasant-row, Highstreet, and Upper-road, Deptford, Kent, stonemason, May 1 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Michael Jones, Theobald's-road, Middlesex, grocer, May 6 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-James Melhuish, Exeter, innkeeper, April 30 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter, div.-Henry Gardner, Liverpool, merchant, April 28 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, div.-T. Turner, Daniel Brade, and Charles Schwind, Liverpool, merchants, April 28 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, div. -Wm. Lax Brown, Liverpool, merchant, April 28 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, div.-Chas. Wil. liams, Sunderland, Durham, currier, April 30 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, div.-William Thompson and James Mellis, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and Buenos Ayres and Monte Video, South America, merchants, April 30 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, div.-Lazenby Pearson, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, currier, April 29 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, div.-Wm. Riddle, Lane-end, Staffordshire, draper, May 12 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, fin. div.-R. W. Fletcher, Joseph Fletcher, and John Fletcher, Walsall, Staffordshire, merchants, May 5 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, fin. div.

CERTIFICATES.

To be allowed, unless Cause be shewn to the contrary on or before the Day of Meeting.

cashire, logwood and drug grinder, May 1 at 12, District
Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester.

To be allowed by the Court of Review in Bankruptcy, unless
Cause be shewn to the contrary on or before April 28.
T. Carey Willard Pierce, Manchester, merchant.-Gilson
Homan, Manchester, merchant.-Thomas Nash the younger,
Stourbridge, Worcestershire, builder.-Jos. Cleary, Church-
road, De Beauvoir-square, Middlesex, builder.-Ed. Sheeter,
Bristol, builder.—Alex. Macdonald, Leadenhall-street, Lon-
don, merchant.—Hugh Hughes, Deansgate, Manchester, linen
draper.
FIAT ANNUlled.

Wm. Edw. Burman, High-street, Weitechapel, Middlesex, hat and shoe dealer.

SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.

John Mackenzie, Inverness, house carpenter.-W. Anderson and Alex. Drummond, Glasgow, accountants.-J. Strong, Glasgow, merchant.-John Dunn and John Wilson, Glasgow, stock brokers.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS

Who have filed their Petitions in the Court of Bankruptcy, and have obtained an Interim Order for Protection from Process.

John Simpson, Carlisle-street, St. Ann, Soho, Middlesex, artist, April 16 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Thos. Shaw, Hutchinson-street, Hutchinson's-market, Houndsditch, London, servant to a dairyman, April 16 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Fred. Theophilus Webster, Plymton, Devonshire, straw hat manufacturer, April 16 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London. - Mary Ferrie, Rye-lane, Peckham, Surrey, widow, carman, April 16 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Edmund Fred. Bell, Fletton, Huntingdon, clerk in the service of the London and Birmingham Railway Company, April 17 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Ed. Davis, Bridport-street, Dorset-square, Middlesex, tailor, April 16 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-T. Mason, Newyard, Broadway, Westminster, Middlesex, coach smith, April 16 at 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Richard Chubb, Lifton, Devonshire, out of business, April 15 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter.-James Stoddard, Longton, Staffordshire, out of business, April 25 at half-past 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham.-Donald M'Donald, Tiverton, Devonshire, surgeon, April 15 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter.-Sam. Shipston Skinner, Honiton, Devonshire, cattle dealer, April 15 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter.-G. Purdy, Burmantofts, Leeds, Yorkshire, bricklayer, April 17 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds.-Wm. Sellers, Oldham, Lancashire, licensed hawker, April 16 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester.Henry Hole, St. Peter and Paul, Bath, Somersetshire, tailor, April 27 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol.-Wm. Short, Walcot, Somersetshire, butcher, April 17 at 12, Dis

car proprietor, April 24 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool.-Isaac Withers, Staverton, Gloucestershire, cider dealer, April 21 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol. John Jones, St. Philip and Jacob, Bristol, stone mason, April 23 at half-past 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol. -Thomas Lewis, Walcot, Bath, Somersetshire, farmer, April 23 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol.-Michael Ryan, Bury, Lancashire, surgeon, April 20 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester.

Saturday, April 4.

Rob. G. Fox, Canterbury, wine merchant, April 28 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-J. C. Edwards, Conduit-st., St. George's, Hanover-square, Middlesex, bill broker, May 1trict Court of Bankruptcy, Bristol.-W. Walker, Liverpool, at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Walter Spiers, North Audley-street, Oxford-street, Middlesex, printer, April 30 at half-past 11, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-T. Wilkinson, Quadrant, Regent-street, and Bathurst-street, Sussex-square, Middlesex, ironmonger, April 30 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-Francis Glass, Basinghall-street, London, woollen factor, April 30 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-W. Harding the elder, Johnson-street and Vincentsquare, Westminster, and West-wharf, Millbank, Middlesex, mason, April 29 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London.-J. Hutchinson, Elland, Halifax, Yorkshire, machine maker, April 28 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds.-Wm. Fordyce, The following Assignees have been appointed. Further ParNewcastle-upon-Tyne, bookseller, April 28 at half-past 10, ticulars may be learned at the Office, in Portugal-st., LinDistrict Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.-Jocoln's-inn-fields, on giving the Number of the Case. nathan Bowman, Carlisle, Cumberland, woollen draper, April The Hon. George Wm. Loftus, Windsor, Berkshire, not in 29 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-any trade, No. 53,844 T.; John Procter and William BeverTyne.-Geo. C. Nicholls, Upton, Cheshire, commission mer-ley, assignees.-Ch. Thos. Board, Sparrow-corner, Minories, chant, April 30 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liver- London, out of business, No. 58,044 T.; Thomas Palmer, aspool.-Thomas B. Daft, Birmingham, button maker, April 29 signee.-William Symonds, Phillack, Cornwall, farmer, No. at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham.-George 66,849 C.; Richard Nicholls the younger, assignee.-William Middleton, Nottingham, wine merchant, May 5 at 11, District Brown, King-street, New-town, Deptford, Kent, travelling Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham.-John Wilkinson, Has- tea dealer, No. 67,286 C.; William M'Naught, assignee.-T. lingden, Lancashire, joiner, April 30 at 1, District Court of Henly, Jamaica-street, Commercial-road, Middlesex, master Bankruptcy, Manchester.-Henry J. Barker, Flixton, Lan-mariner, No. 58,045 T.; William Cooper, assignee.

« AnteriorContinuar »