Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

pretation be more rational than what has gone before, or that conclusion more logical, are questions whose decision must rest with my readers. If, however, my book has any peculiarity, it is its method. It is a comparative study. It is

an attempt to apply the method, which has been found so productive in the domain of Natural Science, to Political Science and Jurisprudence. I do not claim to be the first author who has made this attempt. It is the method chiefly followed by the German publicists. In the French, English, and American literatures, it is, on the other hand, relatively new. Boutmy, Bryce, Dicey, Moses, and Wilson have, indeed, already broken the ground, but the field is capable of a much wider, and also a more minute, cultivation.

It is here that I have chosen to lay out my work, and I trust it will be found that some slight advance has been made in the development of the comparative method in the treatment of this domain of knowledge.

My most grateful acknowledgment for aid in the preparation of this work is due to my friend and colleague, Prof. Dr. Munroe Smith, who, in the midst of other arduous duties, has read the proof sheets of the entire text, and has made many most invaluable criticisms and suggestions upon it, which, almost without exception, have been accepted and incorporated in the work. My most sincere thanks are also due to my friend and former pupil, Dr. Robert Weil, who has, with great care and fidelity, verified all the references, and prepared the table of contents, the table of cases, and the index. His kindly aid has greatly lightened my labors, and his exactness has preserved me against many an error.

WINOOSKI HIGHLANDS, MONTPELIER, VT.,

August, 1890.

JOHN W. BURGESS.

PAGE

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

Principles of political psychology. The nations of modern Europe and the
United States of America are sprung from the Greek, Latin, Celtic,
Teutonic and Slavonic races.

[ocr errors]

1. Political psychology of the Greek and Slav: community sovereignty;
they must be organized politically by foreign peoples

2. Of the Celt: Clanship their highest political organization; they also
must be organized from without

3. Of the Latin: the Universal Empire their great political institution;
characteristics of the Universal Empire

[ocr errors]

31-33

33, 34

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

1. All-comprehensiveness; 2. Exclusiveness; 3. Permanence; 4. Sov-
ereignty ..

Characteristics of sovereignty: (a) It is unlimited

(b) It is the source and support of individual liberty
Exemplification of this fact in history

[ocr errors]

The principle of the sovereignty of the state is opposed because publicists
do not sufficiently distinguish state from government

CHAPTER II. THE ORIGIN OF THE STATE.

The theological, social and historical theories of the origin of the state: the
historical the correct theory.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

The transition stage; the absolute monarchy

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Von Mohl's criticism of the Aristotelian proposition

Schleimacher's vindication thereof

Von Mohl's classification

Criticism of von Mohl

Bluntschli's classification: the Idiokratie

The mixed form of state

Reason for its rejection

Bluntschli confounds state and government: the Compound State (Zusam-
mengesetzte Statsform)

Criticism of the Compound State and its subdivisions: states having colonies
or vassal provinces; states in personal union
The confederacy; the federal state, so-called

[ocr errors]

The Aristotelian proposition is correct and exhaustive.
Modern states are democracies

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Social conditions which precede and make possible the democratic state

CHAPTER IV. THE ENDS OF THE STATE.

[ocr errors]

Criticism of von Holtzendorff's proposition

The ends of the state are, 1. Primary; 2. Secondary; 3. Ultimate

The Ultimate End: Hegel's Sittlichkeit: the World State

The National State the necessary predecessor of the World State; the per-
fecting of its nationality the secondary end of the state

Government and Liberty the primary ends of the state

Government must precede liberty

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

BOOK III. THE FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONS

OF GREAT BRITAIN, THE UNITED STATES, GER-

MANY AND FRANCE.

Reasons for treating this topic as a subject of Political Science instead of as
one of Public Law; why the constitutions of these states are chosen

[ocr errors]

Wherein the constitution of Great Britain differs from that of other states
It is the product of the Revolutionary change of the year 1832

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
« AnteriorContinuar »