 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Rules - 1967 - 348 páginas
...Gentlemen, I would like to repeat that phrase if I may : It is part of a man's civil rights that he be at liberty to refuse business relations with any person...the result of whim, caprice, prejudice or malice. We have not yet reached the stage where the selection of a trader's customers is made for him by the... | |
 | Adam Carlyle Breckenridge - 1970 - 168 páginas
...Cooley's contribution in Adair v. US, 208 US 161 (1908). "It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...result of whim, caprice, prejudice or malice. With his tion to privacy as a right. He especially cited the case of Mapp v. Ohio to say that the Court had... | |
 | Richard M. Steuer - 1983 - 84 páginas
...37-38 (1939). Cooley, in his treatise on torts, explained that it is "part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice." T. COOLEY, A TREATISE ON THE LAW OF TORTS 278 (1880). 144. See, eg, Byars v. Bluff City News Co., 609... | |
 | D.C. Kline - 1987 - 270 páginas
...selection of seller and buyer was wholly his own concern. "It is a part of a man's civil rights that he be at liberty to refuse business relations with any person...the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice." Cooley on Torts, p. 278. See, also, our own opinion in Greater New York Film Co. v. Biograph Co., 203... | |
 | 1917 - 1190 páginas
...employee a broad field of action. As said by Judge Cooley: 'It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...the public nor third persons have any legal concern. ' 'The interference with the trade relations of one with whom you have no trade relations yourself... | |
 | 1908 - 794 páginas
...It is a part of every man's civil rights," said that great lawyer Chief Justice Cooley, of Michigan, "that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...the public nor third persons have any legal concern. " This rule applies equally to master and to servant, to employer and to employee. It is the basis... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1908 - 1378 páginas
...Co. 71 Fed. 931. See also State v". Bateman, 7 Ohio NP 487. It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...the public nor third persons have any legal concern. Brewster v. C. Miller's Sons Co. 101 Ky. 368, 38 LRA 505, 41 SW 301; Cooley, Torts, 278; Hundley v.... | |
 | 1905 - 1234 páginas
...Judge Cooley, in his work on Torts (2d Ed., p. 328), says : "It is a part of every man's civil right that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations...reasons neither the public nor third persons have any concern." If A. may take this step, it does not seem logical to hold that A. and C. together may not,... | |
| |
It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations with any person whomsoever, whether the refusal rests upon reason, or is the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice. 
