 But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful...  Atlantic Reporter - Página 2691919Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | 1892 - 936 páginas
...Neg. 1125; ffartfieM v. Roper, 21 Wend. 615; Con tray v. Reed, 66 Mo. 346, 27 Am. Rep. 854. In order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to a wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1893 - 712 páginas
...have occurred ; and it is laid down in икшу cases, avid by leading text-writets, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not...consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that.it was such as might or ought to have been foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances."... | |
 | 1893 - 1286 páginas
...Kellogg, 94 US 475, it is said: "It is generally held that, in order to warrant a Unding that negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. " The delinition given by the court in its charge is perhaps subject to criticism when... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1893 - 812 páginas
...not to the remote, cause. It is laid down in many cases and by leading text-writers, that in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not...appear that the injury was the natural and probable sequence of the negligence or the wrongful act, and that it was such as might, or ought to, have been... | |
 | 1893 - 1172 páginas
...circumstances of the case. To warrant a jury in finding that negligence Is the proximate cause of the Injury It must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that It ought to have been foreseen In the light of the attending circumstances. Railway Co. v.... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1894 - 626 páginas
...injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not...to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." The court further say: " We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences... | |
 | 1894 - 1280 páginas
...Injury? It is admitted that the rule Is diftk-ult of application. But it Is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not...wrongful act, and that It ought to have been foreseen hi the light of the attending circumstances." The court further say: "We do not say that even the natural... | |
 | William Francis Bailey - 1894 - 674 páginas
...application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of...have been foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances. We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful act or omission... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1894 - 1026 páginas
...would not have occurred. And it is laid down in many cases and by leading text-writers that in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not...consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it was such as might or ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." On page... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1894 - 704 páginas
...circumstances of the case. To warrant a jury in finding that negligence is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Railway Co. v.... | |
| |
