...York and Philadelphia, and between Philadelphia and Baltimore. AVe are now arrived at the inquiry, what is this power? It is the power to regulate; that...vested in congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the constitution....

...York and Philadelphia, and between Philadelphia and Baltimore. We are now arrived at the inquiry — what is this power ? It is the power to regulate ;...to be governed. This power, like all others vested ia Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations...

...That authority is, in the words of Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1 (1824), "the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed." Id., at 196. When considering the validity of asserted applications of this power to wholly private...

...is undeniably broad. In Gibbons v. Ogden. 9 Wheat. (22 US) 1 (1924), Chief Justice Marshall wrote, "What is this power? It is the power to regulate;...others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, nay be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in...

...clause should not be the sole basis of congressional authority to regulate State criminal procedure. "It is the power to regulate, that is to prescribe...vested in congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution...

...Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824). In defining the commerce power, Justice Marshall wrote: "It is the power to regulate, that is to prescribe...vested in congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution...

...power was explained by the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, John Marshall, as early as 1 824: "It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe...which commerce is to be governed. This power, like ail others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges...

...stated that the Congressional power was complete but failed to say whether it was preemptive: . . . what is this power? It is the power to regulate; that...vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution....

...conferred in the manner In which Chief Justice Marshall described the commerce power in Gibbons v. Ogden . "This power, like all others vested In Congress, Is complete in itself, may be exercised to Its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution."...

...Crime, 15 ARIZ. L. REV. — (1973). 98. Chief Justice Marshall went on to say in Gibbons v. Ogden: This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution...