...requirement, proscribed for the very purpose of making the patentee define precisely what his patent is; and it is unjust to the public, as well as an...evasion of the law, to construe it in a manner different than from the plain import of its terms." The specification here is well calculated to admonish the...

...patentee define precisely what his invention is; and it is unjust to the public, as well as evasion of law, to construe it in a manner different from the plain import of its terms." This we accept as the correct law by which we must be governed, and we consider that, if we should declare...

...what his invention is, and it is unjust to the public, as well as an evasion of the law, to construct it in a manner different from the plain import of its terms." White v. Dunbar, 119 US 47-52, 7 Sup. Ct. 72, 30 L. Ed. 303. For still another reason the fifth claim...

...408, 27 L. Ed. 979. In White v. Dunbar, 7 S. Ct. 72, 119 US 47. 30 L. Ed. 303, the Supreme Court said: "The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed...the opinions of this court that it is unnecessary to pursue the subject further. See Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phœnix Iron Co,, 95 U. S. 274, 278 [24 L. Ed....

...US 222. 227, 2G L. Ed. 149; Howe Machine Co. v. National Needle Co., 134 US 388, 394, 33 L. Ed. 963. The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for...manner different from the plain import of its terms. White v. Dunbar, 119 US 47, 52, 30 L. Ed. 303; Howe Machine Co. v. National Needle Co., 134 US 3S8,...

...National Needle Co., supra, the court quoted the following from White v. Dunbar, 119 US 47, ">2 (p. 394) : The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for...manner different from the plain import of its terms. (Howe Machine Co. v. National Needle Co., 134 US 388,394.; The equimolecular proportion of any two...

...requirement that a claim must define the invention was first made in 1886, when the court said : " The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for...manner different from the plain import of its terms." (White v. Dunbar, 119 US 47.) The courts have also held that a claim can not be diminished in its effect...

...National Needle Co.. supra, the court quoted the following from White v. Dunbar, 119 US 47, 52 (p. 394) : The claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed for...manner different from the plain import of its terms. (Howe Machine Co. v. National Needle Co., 134 US 388, 394.) The equimolecular proportion of any two...

...subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention." The Supreme Court long ago recognized that "[t]he claim is a statutory requirement, prescribed...in a manner different from the plain import of its terms."18 Nevertheless, patent applicants sometimes game the system by drafting ambiguous patent claims...

...interpretation including it. In White v. Dunbar, 119 US 47, 7 Sup. Ct. 72, 30 L. Ed. 303, the court says: "The claim Is a statutory requirement, prescribed...manner different from the plain Import of Its terms." In McCarty v. Railroad Co., 160 US 110, Ifi Sup. Ct. 240, 40 L. Ed. 358, the court, at page 116, 160...