 | Michael Ruse - 2004 - 260 páginas
...that many more individuals are born than can possibly survive) that individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance...injurious would be rigidly destroyed. This preservation ol favourable variations and the rejection of injurious variations, I call Natural Selection. (80-81)... | |
 | T.F Glick, Miguel Angel Puig-Samper, R. Ruiz - 2001 - 308 páginas
...this only when such a use does not change the meaning of Darwin's ideas. slight, over others, will have the best chance of surviving and of procreating their kind? On the other hand, we may be feel sure that any variation in the least degree injurious, would be rigidly destroyed" (pp. 80-81).... | |
 | David C. Stove - 388 páginas
...attribute which is injurious to its possessor in the struggle for life. And in that struggle, Darwin says, "we may feel sure that any variation in the least degree injurious would be rigidly destroyed."5 But in fact, obviously, altruism is not "rigidly destroyed." On the contrary, it is common... | |
 | Ernest B. Hook - 2002 - 398 páginas
...many more indiv i duals are born than can possibly survivet that individuals having any advantage, however slight. over others, would have the best chance...of injurious variations. I call Natural Selection. 2t Obviously, in the cenmry and a half since Darwin published the Origia, there has been much debate... | |
 | Daniel R. Brooks, Deborah A. McLennan - 2002 - 682 páginas
...individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance of surviving and procreating their kind? On the other hand, we may...rigidly destroyed. This preservation of favourable individual differences and variations, and the destruction of those which are injurious, I have called... | |
 | Gregory S. Cootsona - 2002 - 124 páginas
...tend to the preservation of that individual, and will generally be inherited by its offspring. The preservation of favourable variations and the rejection...Variations neither useful nor injurious would not affected be by natural selection, and would be left a fluctuating element. It follows that as each... | |
 | Anthony Sanford, Philip Nicholas Johnson-Laird - 2003 - 302 páginas
...that many more individuals are born than can possibly survive) that individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance...of injurious variations, I call Natural Selection. (Darwin 1859: 80-1) In later editions, Darwin introduced the alternative term 'survival of the fittest',... | |
 | Eric M. Gander - 2003 - 324 páginas
...that many more individuals are born than can possibly survive) that individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance...rigidly destroyed. This preservation of favourable individual differences and variations, and the destruction of those which are injurious, I have called... | |
 | Maria K. Bachman, Don Richard Cox - 2003 - 424 páginas
...conditions of life."29 This "struggle for existence" guarantees that "individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance of surviving and of procreating their kind," while "any variation in the least degree injurious would be rigidly destroyed."30 By removing England... | |
 | Michael Ruse - 2003 - 392 páginas
...that many more individuals are born than can possibly survive) that individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance of surviving and of procreating their 100 kind? On the other hand we may feel sure that any variation in the least degree injurious would... | |
| |
If such do occur, can we doubt (remembering that many more individuals are born than can possibly survive) that individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance of surviving and of procreating their kind ? On the... 
