But acts done in the proper exercise of governmental powers, and not directly encroaching upon private property, though their consequences may impair its use, are universally held not to be ' a taking ' within the meaning of the constitutional provision. Albany Law Journal - Página 2941885Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
| Hugo Emil Rudolph Arndt - 1909 - 690 páginas
...placed in charge of the prisons controlled by it." White v. Board, 129 Ind. 396; 28 NE 846. of a county. "Acts done in the proper exercise of governmental...and not directly encroaching upon private property, although the consequence may impair its use, are not such a taking within the meaning of the constitutional... | |
| 1901 - 1164 páginas
...private property for a public use, and must compensate the owner therefor. Brown v. US, 81 Fed. Rep., 55. Acts done in the proper exercise of governmental powers,...and not directly encroaching upon private property, although their consequences may impair its use, are not a taking within the meaning of the constitutional... | |
| United States. Army. Corps of Engineers - 1898 - 976 páginas
...circumstances to pay damages, is as follows: Acte done in the proper exercise of Governmental powere, and not directly encroaching upon private property, though their consequences may impair its пае, are universally held not to be a taking, within the meaning of the constitutional provision.... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1901 - 1086 páginas
...consequential damages, if they act within their jurisdlctiou and with care and skill. 3. Acts, done In ihe proper exercise of governmental powers and not directly encroaching upon private property, although their consequences may impair its use, do not entitle the owner of such property to compensation... | |
| |