 Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial, but is a political question, the determination of which by the legislative and executive departments of any government conclusively binds the judges, as well as all other officers,...  The Federal Reporter - Página 7301902Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | Gary Lawson, Guy Seidman - 2008 - 284 páginas
...concerning guano islands [citing various international law sources, including Vattel, Wheaton, and Halleck]. Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory,...officers, citizens, and subjects of that government. This principle has always been upheld by this court, and has been affirmed under a great variety of... | |
 | 632 páginas
...by sovereign states " (op. cit., p. 341), really turned on the principle of " political question." " Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory...officers, citizens, and subjects of that government. This principle has always been upheld by this court, and has been affirmed under a great variety of... | |
 | Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gasper Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - 1893 - 900 páginas
...case of Jones v. United Slates, 137 US 212, Mr. Justice Gray, speaking for the supreme court, said : " Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory,...officers, citizens and subjects of that government. This principle has always been upheld by this court, and has been affirmed under a great variety of... | |
 | 1900 - 948 páginas
...the same question, the United States Supreme Court say (137 US, 21 2): Who is the sovereign, dejure or de facto, of a territory, is not a judicial but...officers, citizens, and subjects of that government. This principle has always been upheld ' by this court and has been affirmed under a great variety of... | |
 | Louis Fisher - 2009 - 386 páginas
..."political question" by the "political departments ' ' to which the Constitution has committed it ' ' conclusively binds the judges, as well as all other officers, citizens and subjects of. . .government" '.5 Unlike the British doctrine, however, the American one is not limited in operation... | |
| |
