...particular act does or does not fall within thegeneral power of a cashier is said to be a question of law for the court and not of fact for the jury,...agent to perform other and unusual acts for the bank: Farmers' etc. Bank v. Troy City Bank, 1 Doug. (Mich.) 457; Peninsular Bank v. Hanmer, 14 Mich. 208;...

...particular act falls within the general power of a cashier :is a question of law for the court and not for the jury, although a •question of fact may arise when it is claimed that the acts or eon•duct of the board of trustees has amounted to a public holding out of the cashier as its agent...

...facts, or any doubt of the inferences to be drawn therefrom, the question of probable cause is one of law for the court, and not of fact for the jury. Heyne v. Blair, 62 NY 19, reversing 3 T. & C. 263. ^Tiere the facts are undisputed and but one inference...

...negligence contributed to the injury, and that, there being no dispute as to the facts, the question was one of law for the court and not of fact for the jury. Ordinarily the question of negligence is one of mixed law and fact, and it is the duty of the court...

...Co., 175 NY 281, 67 NE 569, 62 LRA 357]. [2] Whether the rules are reasonable or not is a question of law for the court, and not of fact for the jury, when the facts in the case are undisputed. Avery v. New York Cent & HRR Co., 121 NY 31, 24 NE 20; Pittsburgh,...

...mistake, if they should think the difference very great. If it was sufficient of itself, it was a question of law for the court and not of fact for the jury. There was no evidence besides the deed to show fraud in Kreiter or mutual mistake of the parties. The...

...the facts which it is claimed created an agency were undisputed, and the question was therefore one of law for the court, and not of fact for the jury. Secondly, there was no conflict of evidence ; there was none to support the verdict. Thirdly, this...

...undisputed, the question of whether or not a statute forbidding discrimination is applicable is a question of law for the court and not of fact for the jury. Hoover r. Railroad Co., 156 Pa. 220, 27 All. Rep. 282, 22 LR A. 263, 36 Am. St. Rep. 43. 22. Railway...

...overthrowing the record. If the Chief Justice is right as to what was determined, the question is one of law for the Court and not of fact for the jury, to be determined like any other question of law, for it was raised on demurrer to an information in...

...255), Coleman, J., dissenting; llenson v. Stale, 112 Ala. 41 (21 So. 79). Cooling time is a question of law for the court and not of fact for the jury. — Bagland v. Stale, 125 Ala. 12 (£7 So. 983). Cooling time question for court; defendant entering...